CPEA flashcards
CPEA · Build recall with a focused review session.
38 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Audit criteria
- The set of policies, procedures, regulations, permit conditions, and standards against which conformity is judged. Criteria must be defined and communicated before fieldwork begins.
- Audit evidence
- Records, statements of fact, observations, and measurements that are verifiable and relevant to the audit criteria. Findings must be traceable back to recorded evidence.
- Major nonconformity
- A systemic failure or absence of a required control that creates significant risk or likely regulatory breach. It typically requires containment and corrective action before the next scheduled audit.
- Minor nonconformity
- An isolated lapse in an otherwise functioning control, with limited risk and no evidence of system breakdown. It still requires root cause analysis and verified correction.
- Observation finding
- A condition that presents risk or weak practice but does not clearly breach a defined requirement. It is reported for improvement without a formal nonconformity grade.
- Opening meeting purpose
- Confirms scope, criteria, schedule, methods, confidentiality, safety arrangements, and the closing meeting plan. Attendance and any scope changes are recorded.
- Sampling rationale
- The documented justification for how many records, locations, or people were examined. It should reflect risk, control history, and population variability rather than convenience.
- Auditor independence
- Auditors must not assess activities they performed or managed within the review period. Any impairment is declared and mitigated in writing before fieldwork.
- Permit condition traceability
- Each permit condition should map to an operating procedure, a monitoring frequency, and a reporting obligation. Missing links are common audit findings.
- Calibration record check
- Confirms the instrument used for compliance monitoring was calibrated against a traceable standard within its stated interval, and that out-of-tolerance units were withdrawn.
- Averaging period mismatch
- Comparing a monitoring result to a permit limit using the wrong averaging time. This is a frequent cause of false exceedance conclusions during audits.
- Waste accumulation start date
- The date hazardous waste first enters a container, which starts the accumulation clock. Auditors verify the date is marked and within allowed storage time.
- Manifest traceability
- The chain of documentation linking waste generation to the permitted disposal facility. Auditors confirm the final destination and that returned copies are on file.
- Stormwater inspection evidence
- Records showing required site inspections occurred at the specified frequency, with identified deficiencies and documented corrective actions closed out.
- Chemical threshold aggregation
- Totaling a substance across all containers and locations on site to test storage-limit and emergency-planning thresholds. Failure to aggregate is a common finding.
- Hierarchy of controls
- Ranking of hazard controls from elimination and substitution through engineering and administrative controls to PPE. Reliance on PPE alone is audited as a control-adequacy gap.
- Similar exposure group
- A group of workers with comparable exposure profiles due to similar tasks, materials, and conditions. Exposure sampling is designed around these groups.
- Respirator fit testing
- Documented evidence that a tight-fitting respirator seals on the individual user, repeated at the required interval. Records must match the model actually issued.
- Energy control procedure
- A machine-specific lockout/tagout document listing all energy sources, isolation points, stored-energy dissipation steps, and verification of de-energization.
- Permit-required confined space
- A space with a hazardous atmosphere, engulfment potential, or configuration that could trap or asphyxiate. Entry requires a permit unless documented otherwise.
- Near miss recording
- Documentation of events that could have caused harm but did not. Auditors check near misses are captured, investigated, and used to drive corrective action.
- Audit program cycle
- The repeating sequence of setting objectives, planning, conducting audits, reporting, verifying corrective action, and reviewing program performance to inform the next cycle.
- Corrective action effectiveness check
- Verification that an implemented action actually removed the root cause and the condition has not recurred. Closing on the action plan alone is insufficient.
- Repeat finding rate
- The proportion of findings that recur from prior audits. A high rate points to weakness in root cause analysis and corrective action, not individual performance.
- Risk-based audit frequency
- Scheduling audits by hazard severity, regulatory exposure, recent change, and past performance. Higher-risk activities are audited more often and in greater depth.
- Document control test
- Checks that the current revision is available at the point of use, obsolete copies are removed or marked, and changes were approved by the originating function.
- Finding structure
- A finding states the requirement, the objective evidence, and the gap. This structure makes the finding verifiable and defensible during dispute.
- Imminent danger notification
- Immediate escalation to site management when an audit reveals a condition likely to cause serious harm. Time, condition, and response are documented.
- Open-question interviewing
- Asking workers to describe how a task is actually performed before confirming specifics. It reduces coached answers and reveals real practice.
- Dissenting view documentation
- When management disputes a finding, the disagreement is recorded with the evidence and criterion. Findings are not removed to resolve conflict.
- Management of change review
- For process, chemical, or equipment changes, auditors verify hazard review before implementation, updated procedures, training, and permit or notification updates.
- Chain of custody
- Documentation tracking a sample from collection through analysis, showing who handled it and when. It protects the evidential value of monitoring results.
- Legal register currency
- Confirmation that the compliance register reflects requirements in force at the audit date, including amendments still within transition periods.
- Training effectiveness evidence
- Records showing training occurred before task assignment, plus confirmation that workers can describe the hazard controls relevant to their own job.
- Significant environmental aspect
- An activity or product element with or potentially having a significant environmental impact, considering normal, abnormal, and emergency conditions.
- Residual risk grading
- Risk remaining after corrective action is applied. It sets the verification priority and interval for closing the finding.
- Secondary containment check
- Verification that containment capacity and condition can hold a release, that drainage is protected, and that spill response equipment is available and inspected.
- Waste vendor due diligence
- Evidence that disposal contractors hold required permits and acceptable EHS performance, reviewed periodically rather than only at contracting.