I85PREP
⌘ K
Cyprus Bar Exam study materials
Cyprus Bar Exam study resources

Cyprus Bar Exam practice questions

One question at a time. Build your Cyprus Bar Exam understanding.

First 50 of 190 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

In the landmark constitutional case Attorney General of the Republic v. Mustafa Ibrahim and Others (1964) CLR 195, on what legal foundation did the Supreme Court of Cyprus uphold the enactment of the Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Law of 1964 despite non-compliance with the bicommunal provisions of the 1960 Constitution?

  1. The Law of Necessity (Doctrine of Necessity) Correct answer.
  2. The Royal Prerogative of the British Crown
  3. Article 183 of the Constitution governing states of emergency
  4. Direct application of customary international humanitarian law

Explanation

In Attorney General v. Mustafa Ibrahim (1964), the Supreme Court of Cyprus invoked the doctrine of necessity (lex necessitatis) to validate the restructuring of the judicial system after Turkish Cypriot officials withdrew from state organs. The Court ruled that where normal constitutional functioning is paralyzed, state organs may take measures strictly necessary to preserve the functioning of the state.

Question 2Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under the criteria laid down in Attorney General v. Mustafa Ibrahim (1964), which of the following is NOT a required prerequisite for the lawful invocation of the doctrine of necessity by state organs in Cyprus?

  1. Prior approval by a two-thirds majority of the United Nations General Assembly Correct answer.
  2. An imperative and unavoidable necessity or exceptional circumstance threatening the functioning of state organs
  3. The absence of other constitutional remedies to resolve the crisis
  4. The proportionality of the measures taken to the necessity, strictly confined to the duration of the emergency

Explanation

The four cumulative conditions laid down in Mustafa Ibrahim are: (1) an imperative and unavoidable necessity; (2) no other remedy available; (3) the measure must be proportionate to the necessity; and (4) the measure must be temporary in character. United Nations approval is neither a requirement nor a condition of domestic constitutional necessity in Cyprus.

Question 3Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Article 11.5 of the 1960 Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus, what is the maximum duration for which an arrested person may be held in police custody before being brought before a judge?

  1. As soon as possible and in any event not later than 24 hours after arrest Correct answer.
  2. Up to 48 hours after arrest
  3. Up to 72 hours where the officer in charge of the investigation certifies that inquiries are incomplete
  4. Up to 8 days upon application to the Attorney General

Explanation

Article 11.5 of the Constitution mandates that a person arrested shall be brought before a judge as soon as is practicable after arrest and in any event not later than twenty-four hours after the arrest, unless released earlier. Any further detention requires a judicial remand order.

Question 4Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Article 113 of the Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus, what is the constitutional nature of the powers of the Attorney General regarding criminal prosecutions?

  1. The Attorney General has an independent discretion, exercised in the public interest, to institute, conduct, take over, continue, or discontinue any criminal proceedings Correct answer.
  2. The Attorney General can only terminate prosecutions with the prior written concurrence of the Minister of Justice
  3. The Attorney General acts strictly on the advice and under the instruction of the President of the Republic
  4. The Attorney General's decision to enter a nolle prosequi is routinely subject to merits review by the Council of Ministers

Explanation

Article 113 provides that the Attorney General has power, at his discretion in the public interest, to institute, conduct, take over and continue or discontinue any proceedings for any offence against any person in the Republic. Article 112 establishes the office itself and the independence of the Law Office, which is not subordinate to any ministry, so the prosecutorial discretion is exercised free from executive direction.

Question 5Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Article 169.3 of the Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus, what status do treaties and conventions concluded in accordance with Article 169 occupy within the domestic legal hierarchy?

  1. From publication in the Official Gazette they have superior force to any municipal law, subject to the condition that the other contracting party applies them reciprocally Correct answer.
  2. Equal status to ordinary municipal statutes, governed by the lex posterior derogat legi priori rule
  3. Purely advisory status until incorporated verbatim into domestic regulations
  4. Superior force even to the fundamental human rights provisions of the Constitution

Explanation

Article 169.3 provides that treaties, conventions and agreements concluded under Article 169 have, from their publication in the Official Gazette, superior force to any municipal law, on condition that they are likewise applied by the other contracting party. Article 169.2 deals with the earlier stage: negotiation and signature follow a Council of Ministers decision, and the instrument binds the Republic only once ratified by a law of the House of Representatives.

Question 6Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Article 23.4 of the Cyprus Constitution, which of the following is a mandatory prerequisite for the lawful compulsory acquisition (expropriation) of private immovable property by the Republic?

  1. Payment in cash and in advance of a just and equitable compensation, determined by a civil court in case of disagreement Correct answer.
  2. Prior written consent of the majority of registered land owners in the same cadastral district
  3. Immediate physical transfer of title before the enactment of any enabling requisition order
  4. Approval by an absolute majority vote of the Municipal Council where the property is located

Explanation

Article 23.4 permits compulsory acquisition only for a purpose of public benefit specially provided by a general compulsory acquisition law, only where that purpose is specified in a reasoned decision of the acquiring authority, and only upon payment in cash and in advance of a just and equitable compensation, which in case of disagreement is determined by a civil court.

Question 7Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Article 23.5 of the Cyprus Constitution, what occurs if the purpose for which immovable property was compulsorily acquired is abandoned or not attained within three years from the date of acquisition?

  1. The acquiring authority must offer the property back to the original owner at the price paid for its acquisition Correct answer.
  2. The property automatically escheats to the general revenue fund of the Republic without recourse
  3. The property is auctioned publicly to the highest commercial bidder
  4. The acquiring authority may retain the land indefinitely for any alternative governmental use without notifying the former owner

Explanation

Article 23.5 requires that compulsorily acquired immovable property be used exclusively for the purpose of the acquisition. If that purpose is not attained within three years, the acquiring authority must, immediately after that period expires, offer the property back to the person from whom it was acquired at the acquisition price. That person then has three months to notify acceptance, and the property is returned once the price is repaid within a further three months.

Question 8Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Article 12 of the Constitution of Cyprus guarantees fundamental safeguards in criminal proceedings. Which principle is explicitly protected under Article 12.1?

  1. Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege (prohibition of retroactive criminal offenses and retroactive heavier penalties) Correct answer.
  2. Mandatory trial by jury for all indictable offenses punishable by more than two years imprisonment
  3. Automatic expungement of criminal records upon payment of a statutory administrative fine
  4. The right to private prosecution without oversight by the Law Office of the Republic

Explanation

Article 12.1 of the Constitution establishes that no person shall be held guilty of any criminal offense on account of any act or omission which did not constitute an offense under the law at the time when it was committed, nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than that applicable at the time.

Question 9Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Article 12.2 of the Cyprus Constitution, which constitutional safeguard protects an individual who has been tried and acquitted or convicted of an offense?

  1. The rule against double jeopardy (non bis in idem), prohibiting a second trial for the same offense Correct answer.
  2. The right to choose the presiding judge on appeal
  3. The absolute right to bail pending extradition hearings
  4. The right to have all police notes destroyed immediately following acquittal

Explanation

Article 12.2 enacts the rule against double jeopardy: no person shall be tried twice for the same offense. A final acquittal or conviction by a competent court bars subsequent criminal prosecution for the same substantive offense.

Question 10Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Article 28 of the 1960 Constitution of Cyprus, how is the principle of equality before the law interpreted by the courts?

  1. Equal treatment of persons in similar situations; differentiation is permissible only if based on objective, reasonable, and relevant grounds Correct answer.
  2. Absolute identical mathematical treatment of all persons regardless of factual differences
  3. Protection that applies only to citizens of the Republic and excludes foreign nationals entirely
  4. A principle applicable exclusively to criminal sentencing and inapplicable to taxation

Explanation

Article 28 ensures that all persons are equal before the law, the administration, and justice. Cypriot jurisprudence (e.g., Mikrommatis v. Republic) establishes that equality requires equal treatment of substantially similar situations, but permits differentiation where it is based on objective, rational, and justifiable criteria.

Question 11Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 32 of the Courts of Justice Law (Law 14/1960) and landmark Supreme Court decisions (e.g., Odysseos v. Pieris), what are the three cumulative statutory conditions for granting an interim interlocutory injunction?

  1. A serious question to be tried, a probability of success, and that it is difficult or impossible to do complete justice at a later stage without the order Correct answer.
  2. Proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt, irreparable financial loss, and an undertaking by the Attorney General
  3. Immediate urgent danger of bankruptcy, lack of foreign assets, and registration of a lis pendens memo
  4. Consent of the opposing party, payment of security into court, and a pending criminal indictment

Explanation

Under Section 32 of Law 14/1960 as interpreted in Odysseos v. Pieris Nets (1982) 1 CLR 557 and subsequent authorities, the applicant must satisfy three conditions: (1) a serious question to be tried on the merits; (2) a probability of the applicant being entitled to relief (something more than a mere possibility but less than balance of probabilities); and (3) that unless the order is made, it will be difficult or impossible to do complete justice at a later stage. If satisfied, the court weighs the balance of convenience.

Question 12Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under the Courts of Justice Law (Law 14/1960), which court in Cyprus has original jurisdiction to try criminal offenses punishable by imprisonment exceeding five years or life imprisonment?

  1. The Assize Court (Κακουργιοδικείο) Correct answer.
  2. The District Court (Επαρχιακό Δικαστήριο) sitting with a single judge
  3. The Administrative Court (Διοικητικό Δικαστήριο)
  4. The Family Court (Οικογενειακό Δικαστήριο)

Explanation

Section 20 of Law 14/1960 gives each Assize Court jurisdiction to try every offence punishable under the Criminal Code or any other law committed within the Republic, and the Assize Court sits as a bench of three judges without a jury. Because section 24 caps the summary criminal jurisdiction of a District Court judge at five years' imprisonment, offences carrying a heavier maximum are tried before the Assize Court.

Question 13Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 4 of the Advocates Law (Cap. 2), what is the statutory period of practical legal training (pupillage / άσκηση) required of a trainee advocate before applying for enrollment as an advocate in Cyprus?

  1. At least 12 months in the office of an advocate practicing for not less than 5 years, or in the Law Office of the Republic Correct answer.
  2. 6 months in any registered corporate services provider
  3. 24 months in an accredited international commercial bank
  4. 3 years in a judicial clerkship at the Supreme Court

Explanation

Under section 4(e) of Cap. 2, a candidate must have completed, after obtaining the law degree, a period of pupillage of not less than twelve months in the office of an advocate who has practised for at least five years. A candidate who satisfies the Attorney General that no such place could be secured may instead train at the Law Office of the Republic. If the twelve months are not continuous they must be completed within three years, and the first six months must be continuous.

Question 14Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under the Advocates Law (Cap. 2), which statutory body is vested with disciplinary jurisdiction over registered advocates in Cyprus for professional misconduct or breach of conduct rules?

  1. The Disciplinary Board (Πειθαρχικό Συμβούλιο Δικηγόρων) Correct answer.
  2. The Ministry of Finance
  3. The District Land Registry Council
  4. The Commissioner of Personal Data Protection

Explanation

Section 16 of the Advocates Law (Cap. 2) establishes the Disciplinary Board (Πειθαρχικό Συμβούλιο) to exercise control and disciplinary power over every advocate. It is chaired by the Attorney General (or, in his absence, the Deputy Attorney General) and comprises the President of the Cyprus Bar Association plus ten practising advocates appointed by the Bar Council, at least three of whom have practised for twenty years or more.

Question 15Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Which disciplinary sanction is NOT among the statutory penalties that the Disciplinary Board of Advocates may impose under Section 17 of the Advocates Law (Cap. 2)?

  1. Sentence of criminal imprisonment in the central prisons Correct answer.
  2. Striking the advocate off the Roll of Advocates (disbarment)
  3. Suspending the advocate from practicing the profession for a specified period
  4. Imposition of a pecuniary penalty (fine) or formal reprimand

Explanation

The Disciplinary Board is a disciplinary tribunal, not a criminal court. Section 17(1) of Cap. 2 lists a closed set of sanctions: warning or reprimand, a fine not exceeding €20,000, suspension of the practising licence, or striking the advocate's name off the Roll of Advocates. Section 17(2) adds a costs order. Imprisonment is not among them.

Question 16Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under the Advocates' Code of Conduct in Cyprus, when an advocate is faced with a conflict between their duty to the client and their duty to the court, which duty prevails?

  1. The advocate's overriding duty to the court and the administration of justice prevails Correct answer.
  2. The duty to follow the client's instructions always supersedes duties to the court
  3. The advocate must prioritize the commercial interests of the client who pays their fees
  4. The conflict must be resolved by holding a private ballot among the partners of the law firm

Explanation

As an officer of the court (ministri justitiae), an advocate in Cyprus owes an overriding duty to the court, the administration of justice, and the integrity of the legal system. An advocate must never deceive or mislead the court, suborn perjury, or breach the law to advance a client's instructions.

Question 17Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under the professional conduct rules established by the Cyprus Bar Association, what is the rule regarding an advocate acting for both the vendor and the purchaser in a contentious dispute or transaction involving conflicting interests?

  1. An advocate must not represent both parties where there is an actual conflict of interest or a significant risk of conflict Correct answer.
  2. An advocate may represent both parties freely if they charge each party half the standard fee
  3. An advocate may represent both opposing parties in court provided both sign an informal verbal agreement
  4. An advocate must always represent both parties to promote amicable out-of-court settlements

Explanation

Under the Cyprus Advocates' Code of Conduct (and general common law ethics), an advocate cannot represent two clients with conflicting or potentially conflicting interests. In contentious litigation, dual representation is strictly prohibited. In property transactions, dual representation is heavily restricted and impermissible where conflict arises.

Question 18Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Regarding client funds received by an advocate in Cyprus, what is the strict obligation imposed by the Advocates (Accounts) Rules?

  1. Client money must be kept in a separate designated client bank account and must never be commingled with the advocate's personal or office operating funds Correct answer.
  2. Client money may be deposited into the advocate's personal savings account provided interest is credited annually
  3. Client money can be used to pay the firm's monthly payroll if repaid within 30 days
  4. Client money must be converted into state treasury bonds within 48 hours of receipt

Explanation

Under the Advocates' Accounts Rules in Cyprus, all money received by an advocate on behalf of or held for a client must be paid without delay into a separate, distinct 'Client Account' at an authorized credit institution. Commingling client funds with the advocate's office or personal funds constitutes serious professional misconduct.

Question 19Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

In Cyprus legal practice, what is the general rule regarding contingency fee agreements (pactum de quota litis), where an advocate agrees to receive a percentage of the recovered proceeds as their fee?

  1. Agreements for quota litis (claiming a percentage of the proceeds of litigation as fees) are strictly prohibited as contrary to public policy and professional conduct Correct answer.
  2. Quota litis agreements are encouraged and enforceability is automatic in all personal injury cases
  3. An advocate may demand up to 75% of the judgment debt if the client is an overseas company
  4. Contingency fees are permissible provided the fee is paid in cash prior to trial

Explanation

Under Cyprus law and the Advocates' Code of Conduct, pactum de quota litis (an agreement whereby an advocate claims a share of the proceeds of a successful lawsuit) is void as contrary to public policy and constitutes serious professional misconduct.

Question 20Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Legal professional privilege protects confidential communications between an advocate and their client. Under what circumstance does this privilege NOT apply under Cyprus law?

  1. Where the communication was made in furtherance of an ongoing or future crime, fraud, or unlawful act Correct answer.
  2. Where the client is sued in a civil contract action
  3. Where the opposing party demands disclosure under standard discovery rules
  4. Where the legal advice relates to pre-existing tax liabilities

Explanation

Legal professional privilege is absolute once established, but it does not extend to communications made to facilitate, plan, or execute an ongoing or future crime or fraud (the 'crime/fraud exception'). A client cannot use legal consultation as a cloak or vehicle for committing illegal acts.

Question 21Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 7 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154), what is the statutory rule concerning ignorance of the law as a criminal defense?

  1. Ignorance of the law does not exclude criminal responsibility for an act or omission which would otherwise constitute an offense, unless the law expressly provides that knowledge of the law is an element of the offense Correct answer.
  2. Ignorance of the law excludes responsibility whenever the accused is a foreign national who has been in Cyprus for less than 30 days
  3. Ignorance of the law reduces any felony automatically to a misdemeanor
  4. Ignorance of the law excludes responsibility where the accused acted in the honest exercise of a claim of right over property

Explanation

Section 7 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154) codifies ignorantia juris non excusat: ignorance of the law is not a ground for excluding criminal responsibility unless the law expressly makes the offender's knowledge of the law an element of the offense.

Question 22Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 10 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154), when does a person who does an act under an honest and reasonable mistake of fact avoid criminal responsibility?

  1. When the person did the act under an honest and reasonable, but mistaken, belief in the existence of any state of things, to no greater extent than if the real state of things had been as they believed Correct answer.
  2. Only when the mistake of fact was certified in writing by a public notary before the act
  3. Whenever the accused held the belief honestly, however unreasonable that belief was in the circumstances
  4. Only in civil claims, as mistake of fact is never recognized in Cyprus criminal law

Explanation

Section 10 of Cap. 154 provides that a person who does an act under an honest and reasonable, but mistaken, belief in the existence of a state of things is not criminally responsible to any greater extent than if the real state of things had been such as they believed. The mistake must be both honest (subjective) and reasonable (objective).

Question 23Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 12 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154), which codifies the principles of criminal insanity in Cyprus, what must be established to exempt an accused from criminal responsibility?

  1. That at the time of committing the act, the accused was through disease of the mind incapable of understanding what they were doing or of knowing that they ought not to do the act Correct answer.
  2. That the accused had an eccentric personality or experienced extreme marital frustration
  3. That the accused was suffering from temporary anger or loss of temper caused by verbal insult
  4. That the accused had an intelligence quotient slightly below the national population average

Explanation

Section 12 of Cap. 154 reflects the M'Naghten rules: a person is not criminally responsible if at the time of the act, through disease of the mind, they are incapable of understanding what they are doing, or of knowing that they ought not to do the act. Every person is presumed sane until the contrary is proved on the balance of probabilities.

Question 24Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 16 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154), what are the statutory boundaries of the defense of compulsion (duress by threats) in Cyprus?

  1. The act must have been compelled by threats which at the time reasonably caused a fear of immediate death, and the defense is unavailable for premeditated murder and the treason offenses in sections 36 and 37 Correct answer.
  2. It is a complete defense to any criminal offense without exception, including premeditated murder
  3. It can only be claimed if the person making the threat was a public officer
  4. It applies wherever the accused feared any serious financial or reputational harm

Explanation

Section 16 of Cap. 154 provides that, except for premeditated murder (φόνος εκ προμελέτης) and the treason offenses in sections 36 and 37, an act is not an offense where the person was compelled to do it by threats which at the time of the act reasonably caused a fear of immediate death. The defense is lost if the accused voluntarily, or through a reasonable fear of harm less than immediate death, placed himself in the situation in which he became subject to that compulsion.

Question 25Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Section 17 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154) provides the defense of necessity (κατάσταση ανάγκης). Which set of conditions must the accused prove to rely on it?

  1. That the act was done only to avert otherwise unavoidable consequences which would have caused irreparable evil to the accused or to persons he has a duty to protect, that it did not exceed what was reasonably necessary, and that the harm caused was not disproportionate to the harm averted Correct answer.
  2. That the accused acted under threats which reasonably caused a fear of immediate death
  3. That the accused honestly but mistakenly believed in a state of things which, had it existed, would have made the act lawful
  4. That the accused was, through disease of the mind, incapable of understanding what he was doing

Explanation

Section 17 of Cap. 154 allows an act or omission that would otherwise be an offense to go unpunished where the accused proves three cumulative matters: that it was done solely to avert consequences that were otherwise unavoidable and would have caused irreparable evil to himself or to persons he is bound to protect; that the act did not exceed what was reasonably necessary for that purpose; and that the evil caused was not disproportionate to the evil averted.

Question 26Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 20 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154), which person is deemed to be a principal party to an offense and may be charged with actually committing it?

  1. Any person who aids, abets, counsels, or procures any other person to commit the offense Correct answer.
  2. Only the individual whose hand physically executed the final act
  3. An accessory after the fact who harbored the offender after the crime was completed
  4. A bystander who witnessed the offense and failed to report it within 24 hours

Explanation

Section 20 of Cap. 154 codifies secondary liability: every person who aids, abets, counsels, or procures another person to commit an offense is deemed to have taken part in committing the offense and may be charged and convicted as a principal offender.

Question 27Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

What is the crucial statutory distinction between Murder under Section 203 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154) and Manslaughter under Section 205?

  1. Murder requires proof of premeditation (malice aforethought / εκ προμελέτης), whereas manslaughter is an unlawful killing without premeditation Correct answer.
  2. Murder applies only to the killing of public officials, whereas manslaughter applies to private citizens
  3. Murder is triable in the District Court, whereas manslaughter must be tried in the Supreme Court
  4. Murder requires a weapon, whereas manslaughter can only be committed through medical negligence

Explanation

Under Section 203 and Section 204 of Cap. 154, murder requires the unlawful killing of another human being with 'premeditation' (malice aforethought / εκ προμελέτης), carrying mandatory life imprisonment. Under Section 205, any person who by an unlawful act or omission causes the death of another without premeditation is guilty of manslaughter.

Question 28Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 255 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154), what are the essential legal elements that constitute the offense of Theft?

  1. Fraudulently and without claim of right taking and carrying away anything capable of being stolen with intent to permanently deprive the owner thereof Correct answer.
  2. Entering into a commercial contract and subsequently defaulting on payment
  3. Borrowing an item with the genuine intention and ability to return it within 24 hours
  4. Possessing goods belonging to another without knowledge of their presence

Explanation

Section 255 of Cap. 154 defines theft: a person steals who, without the consent of the owner, fraudulently and without a bona fide claim of right, takes and carries away anything capable of being stolen with the intent, at the time of taking, to permanently deprive the owner thereof.

Question 29Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 366 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154), when does conduct cross the threshold from mere preparation to a punishable criminal Attempt?

  1. When the person begins to put their intention into execution by means adapted to its fulfillment and manifests the intention by some overt act, moving beyond mere preparation Correct answer.
  2. As soon as the person conceives a secret mental plan in their mind
  3. When the person buys an ordinary train ticket without purchasing any criminal tools
  4. Only after the intended victim suffers actual physical injury

Explanation

Under Section 366 of Cap. 154, an attempt requires that the offender begins to put their intention into execution by means adapted to its fulfillment and manifests that intention by an overt act. It must be an act proximate and immediately connected with the commission of the offense, rather than mere preparatory steps.

Question 30Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 371 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 154), what constitutes the actus reus of the inchoate offense of conspiracy to commit a felony?

  1. The agreement between the accused and another person to commit the felony Correct answer.
  2. The actual completed execution of the underlying substantive felony
  3. A unilateral decision by one person to commit an offense in the future
  4. Inciting another person to commit an offense, whether or not that person agrees to commit it

Explanation

Section 371 of Cap. 154 makes it a felony to conspire with another to commit a felony, or to do an act anywhere in the world that would be a felony if done in the Republic and is an offense where it is intended to be done. The essence of the offense is the agreement (concursus mentium); it is complete on agreement, regardless of whether any further step is taken. Section 372 makes conspiracy to commit a misdemeanour a separate offense.

Question 31Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 51 of the Civil Wrongs Law (Cap. 148), which elements must a plaintiff prove to succeed in an action for the tort of Negligence in Cyprus?

  1. That the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, breached that duty, and thereby caused damage to the plaintiff that was not too remote Correct answer.
  2. That the defendant acted with intentional malice and fraudulent misrepresentation
  3. That the defendant breached an express written contract registered with the Registrar of Companies
  4. That the defendant was convicted of a criminal offense in the Assize Court

Explanation

Section 51(1) of Cap. 148 codifies the tort of negligence: negligence consists of doing an act which in the circumstances a reasonable and prudent person would not do, or failing to do an act which such a person would do. The plaintiff must establish: (1) duty of care; (2) breach of duty; and (3) actionable damage caused by the breach that is not too remote.

Question 32Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 57 of the Civil Wrongs Law (Cap. 148), how does the defense of Contributory Negligence operate in Cyprus tort law?

  1. It operates to reduce the damages awarded to the plaintiff to such extent as the court thinks just and equitable having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility Correct answer.
  2. It acts as an absolute bar to recovery, completely dismissing the plaintiff's claim if they contributed even 1% to the damage
  3. It transfers all liability to the state treasury fund
  4. It converts the civil action into an arbitration under the Chamber of Commerce

Explanation

Section 57 of Cap. 148 incorporates the modern apportionment rule: where a person suffers damage partly through their own fault and partly through the fault of another, contributory negligence does not defeat the claim, but damages are reduced to such extent as the court deems just and equitable.

Question 33Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 17 of the Civil Wrongs Law (Cap. 148), which of the following is required for a statement to constitute actionable Defamation in Cyprus?

  1. The statement must be defamatory, refer to the plaintiff, and be published to at least one third party other than the plaintiff Correct answer.
  2. The statement must be spoken verbally in a public assembly of at least 50 persons
  3. The statement must cause immediate physical damage to real property
  4. The statement must be published in a daily newspaper registered in Cyprus

Explanation

Under Section 17 and Section 18 of Cap. 148, defamation consists of the publication (by words, writing, or gestures) of defamatory matter concerning another person to at least one third party without lawful justification or excuse.

Question 34Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 19 of the Civil Wrongs Law (Cap. 148), which defense provides a complete defense to a civil action for defamation if proven by the defendant?

  1. Justification / Truth (that the matters published were true in substance and in fact) Correct answer.
  2. That the defendant did not intend to hurt the plaintiff's feelings
  3. That the defendant repeated a rumor heard from an anonymous taxi driver
  4. That the plaintiff is wealthier than the defendant

Explanation

Under Section 19(a) of Cap. 148, it is a complete defense to a defamation action to prove that the defamatory imputation was true in substance and in fact (justification). The law does not protect an unearned or false reputation.

Question 35Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

In Cyprus defamation law, what is the key legal difference between Absolute Privilege and Qualified Privilege?

  1. Absolute privilege affords complete immunity regardless of malice, whereas qualified privilege is defeated if the plaintiff proves the statement was made with actual malice (bad faith) Correct answer.
  2. Absolute privilege applies only to television broadcasts, whereas qualified privilege applies to radio
  3. Qualified privilege protects statements in court, whereas absolute privilege protects private dinner parties
  4. Absolute privilege requires payment of an administrative fee to the Registrar

Explanation

Under Section 20 and Section 21 of Cap. 148, absolute privilege (e.g., statements made in parliamentary or judicial proceedings) provides an unassailable immunity even if made maliciously. In contrast, qualified privilege (e.g., duty-and-interest communications) is rebutted if the plaintiff proves actual malice.

Question 36Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

How does Section 26 of the Civil Wrongs Law (Cap. 148) define the civil wrong of assault (επίθεση), and how does it differ from the English division between assault and battery?

  1. Cap. 148 uses a single civil wrong that covers both the intentional application of force to another without consent and an attempt or threat to use such force that reasonably causes the other to believe the defendant then has the intention and the ability to carry it out Correct answer.
  2. Cap. 148 creates two separate civil wrongs, assault in section 26 and battery in section 27, mirroring the English division exactly
  3. Cap. 148 recognises only the actual application of force; a threatening gesture that causes no contact is never actionable
  4. Cap. 148 recognises only the threat of force; actual physical contact is dealt with exclusively by the Criminal Code

Explanation

Section 26(1) of Cap. 148 defines a single civil wrong, επίθεση, in terms that absorb both English concepts: the intentional use of force of any kind against the person of another, directly or indirectly and without consent (or with consent obtained by fraud), and also an attempt or threat by act or gesture to use such force where the defendant causes the other to believe on reasonable grounds that he then has both the intention and the ability to carry it out. Section 26(2) extends 'use of force' to heat, light, electricity, gas and odours used so as to cause damage. Section 27 does not create a second tort; it sets out the special defences to an action for assault.

Question 37Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 29 of the Civil Wrongs Law (Cap. 148), which of the following is an essential requirement to establish the civil wrong of false imprisonment (παράνομη κατακράτηση προσώπου)?

  1. Unlawful total deprivation of the plaintiff's liberty for any period, brought about either by physical means or by a show of authority Correct answer.
  2. Confinement inside a certified state correctional facility
  3. Physical application of handcuffs or iron shackles to the plaintiff's limbs
  4. Proof of actual monetary financial loss resulting from the confinement

Explanation

Section 29 of Cap. 148 defines false imprisonment as the unlawful total deprivation (ολοσχερής στέρηση) of a person's liberty for any period, by physical means or by a show of authority. The restraint must be total rather than partial, and no proof of damage is required. Section 29 contains a proviso allowing a parent, guardian or teacher to restrain a child, ward or pupil temporarily for the reasonable purpose of discipline, and section 30 lists the defences, such as acting under a warrant or lawful detention under a statute.

Question 38Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 46 of the Civil Wrongs Law (Cap. 148), what must a claimant show to prove a Private Nuisance?

  1. An unlawful, substantial, and unreasonable interference with the claimant's use and enjoyment of their land or interest in land Correct answer.
  2. A single isolated act of minor commercial competition across town
  3. Direct physical entry onto the land with boots or vehicles (trespass quare clausum fregit)
  4. An intentional oral insult directed at the claimant while walking on a public highway

Explanation

Section 46 of Cap. 148 defines private nuisance as any person who so conducts themselves or uses their property as to cause substantial interference with the use and enjoyment of another's immovable property. It requires continuous or recurrent indirect interference (e.g., fumes, noise, vibrations).

Question 39Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

A claimant sues in Cyprus for damage caused by the escape of a dangerous substance from the defendant's premises. How does Section 52 of the Civil Wrongs Law (Cap. 148) treat that claim, compared with the English rule in Rylands v. Fletcher?

  1. Cap. 148 does not enact strict liability. Once the claimant proves that the damage was caused by a dangerous thing, fire or animal, or by the escape of a thing whose escape is likely to cause damage, and that the defendant owned or was responsible for it or occupied the premises from which it escaped, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove the absence of negligence for which he is responsible Correct answer.
  2. Cap. 148 reproduces Rylands v. Fletcher, so a defendant who brings a dangerous thing onto land is answerable for the escape irrespective of negligence and regardless of any proof he may offer
  3. Cap. 148 abolishes any remedy for escaping dangerous things, leaving the claimant to sue only in contract
  4. Cap. 148 makes the claim actionable only where the claimant proves that the defendant acted with intent or malice

Explanation

Section 3 of Cap. 148 makes the enumerated civil wrongs the exclusive source of tortious liability, and Cap. 148 contains no free-standing strict liability rule for escaping dangerous things. Instead section 52 reverses the burden of proof: once the claimant establishes that the damage was caused by a dangerous thing, by fire or by an animal, or by the escape of anything whose escape is likely to cause damage, and that the defendant was the owner of or responsible for that thing or occupied the property from which it escaped, the defendant must prove that there was no negligence for which he is responsible. Sections 53 and 54 apply the same technique to damage caused by fire and by animals, and section 55 to res ipsa loquitur situations.

Question 40Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Section 13 of the Civil Wrongs Law (Cap. 148), under what circumstances is an employer (master) vicariously liable for the tortious acts of an employee (servant)?

  1. Where the tortious act was authorized by the employer or was a wrongful and unauthorized mode of doing an act authorized by the employer in the course of employment Correct answer.
  2. Whenever the employee commits any unlawful act anywhere in the world, even on personal vacation
  3. Only if the employer signed a written guarantee agreeing to pay for all crimes of the employee
  4. Never, because in Cyprus law employers are completely exempt from employee torts

Explanation

Section 13 of Cap. 148 codifies vicarious liability: an employer is liable for any civil wrong committed by an employee in the course of employment. Under the Salmond test applied by Cyprus courts, this includes acts authorized by the master, or unauthorized modes of carrying out authorized tasks.

Question 41Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Part 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 (in force 1 September 2023) in Cyprus, what constitutes the Overriding Objective (Πρωταρχικός Σκοπός) governing all civil proceedings?

  1. Enabling the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost Correct answer.
  2. Maximizing the collection of stamp duty and court registry fees for the Republic
  3. Ensuring that all commercial claims settle automatically without any trial
  4. Granting absolute priority to claims filed by foreign multinational corporations

Explanation

Rule 1.2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 provides that the rules are a procedural code whose overriding objective is to enable the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost. Rule 1.2(2) spells that out as putting the parties on an equal footing, saving expense, dealing with the case proportionately to the amount in issue, its importance, its complexity and each party's financial position, ensuring expedition and fairness, allotting an appropriate share of the court's resources, and enforcing compliance with the rules and orders.

Question 42Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Cyprus civil practice under the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 is accompanied by pre-action protocols (προδικαστικά πρωτόκολλα). What do they require of a prospective claimant, and what follows from non-compliance?

  1. The claimant should send a letter of claim setting out the facts, the basis of the claim and the sum claimed, allow the other side a reasonable time to respond, and exchange information and consider settlement; non-compliance is taken into account by the court, principally in costs Correct answer.
  2. The claimant must obtain the court's permission before issuing any claim form, and a claim issued without permission is a nullity
  3. The claimant must publish notice of the intended litigation in a national newspaper before issuing proceedings
  4. The claimant must submit the file to the Attorney General, whose decision on the merits binds the parties unless appealed

Explanation

The pre-action protocols require prospective parties to put their case in writing before proceedings, exchange enough information to understand each other's position, and consider settlement or alternative dispute resolution. They are not a jurisdictional precondition to issuing a claim; their teeth lie in the court's case management and costs powers. Rule 34.8(2)(ε) of the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 confirms their standing by directing the court to consider whether an expert was instructed in compliance with any relevant pre-action protocol.

Question 43Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

In civil litigation in Cyprus, how is an ordinary civil action initiated in the District Court?

  1. By filing a Claim Form (Έντυπο Απαίτησης / Writ of Summons) with the Court Registry accompanied by or followed by a Statement of Claim Correct answer.
  2. By serving a letter of claim on the defendant, which of itself commences the proceedings
  3. By lodging a complaint with the police, who then refer the dispute to the District Court
  4. By publishing notice of the intended claim in the Official Gazette of the Republic

Explanation

Civil actions are formally commenced by sealing and filing a Claim Form (under the New CPR 2023) or a specially/generally endorsed Writ of Summons (under legacy Cap. 6 / CPR Order 2) in the District Court Registry, followed by service upon the defendant.

Question 44Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

What is the procedure if a defendant, having been properly served with a Claim Form in Cyprus, fails to file an Acknowledgment of Service or Defense within the prescribed time limit?

  1. The claimant may apply to the court for Judgment in Default (Απόφαση ερήμην) Correct answer.
  2. The case is automatically dismissed with costs against the claimant
  3. The court issues an automatic bench warrant for the defendant's immediate arrest
  4. The claim is transferred to the criminal Assize Court for trial

Explanation

Default judgment is governed by Part 13 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 (ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ ΕΡΗΜΗΝ). Where the defendant files no memorandum of appearance or no defence within the prescribed time, the claimant may request judgment in default, using Form 15 for a specified sum, Form 16 where the sum is to be assessed by the court, and Form 17 for a claim for delivery of goods. Part 14 governs applications to set aside or vary such a judgment.

Question 45Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under what standard may a claimant obtain Summary Judgment (Συνοπτική Απόφαση) under Cyprus Civil Procedure Rules (Order 18 / New CPR Part 24)?

  1. Where the defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim and there is no other compelling reason why the claim should be disposed of at a full trial Correct answer.
  2. Wherever the claim is for a specified sum of money, whatever the merits of the defence
  3. Only if the defendant expressly confesses liability in open court during the preliminary hearing
  4. Where the value of the claim is under €500

Explanation

Summary judgment under Order 18 of the former rules and Part 24 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 allows the court to enter judgment without a full trial where the defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim or issue and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at trial. The application is made under the general applications procedure in Part 23.

Question 46Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

What is the primary purpose and standard for granting a Mareva Injunction (Freezing Order / Διάταγμα Παγοποίησης Περιουσιακών Στοιχείων) under Cyprus law?

  1. To restrain a defendant from dissipating, concealing, or removing assets from the jurisdiction to defeat any future judgment that may be entered against them Correct answer.
  2. To punish the defendant for past breaches of corporate contract
  3. To transfer ownership of the frozen assets immediately into the claimant's personal account
  4. To automatically declare the defendant bankrupt without further judicial proceedings

Explanation

A Mareva injunction (recognized under Section 32 of Law 14/1960 and CPR) is an in personam interlocutory order designed to preserve the status quo by restraining the defendant from dissipating or removing their assets from the jurisdiction so that the plaintiff's potential judgment is not rendered nugatory. It requires a good arguable case and clear risk of dissipation.

Question 47Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

What is the nature of an Anton Piller Order (Search Order / Διάταγμα Έρευνας και Κατάσχεσης) in Cyprus civil practice?

  1. An ex parte order requiring the respondent to permit the applicant's solicitors to enter premises to search for, inspect, and preserve vital documents or property that might otherwise be destroyed Correct answer.
  2. A judicial search warrant issued under section 27 of Cap. 155 authorising the police to search premises for evidence of an offence
  3. An order requiring the respondent to disclose the whereabouts of assets located outside the jurisdiction
  4. An order transferring the respondent's documents into the applicant's ownership pending trial

Explanation

An Anton Piller order is an extraordinary, draconian equitable remedy obtained ex parte. It orders the defendant to allow the applicant's supervising solicitors to enter premises to inspect and preserve vital evidence. It requires an extremely strong prima facie case, serious potential damage to the applicant, and clear evidence of risk of destruction.

Question 48Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under Part 30 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 in Cyprus, what is the role of the case management hearing (συνεδρία διαχείρισης υπόθεσης) in an ordinary claim?

  1. The court gives directions for the conduct of the proceedings up to trial, fixes the date for filing any pre-trial checklist, fixes any pre-trial review, and fixes the trial date Correct answer.
  2. The court delivers its final ruling on the constitutional validity of the legislation in issue
  3. The court hears the parties in private with their advocates excluded
  4. The court fixes the statutory fees payable to the Ministry of Justice

Explanation

Rule 30.2 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 requires the court, on classifying a claim as an ordinary claim, to fix a date for the case management hearing. At that hearing it gives directions for the subsequent conduct of the proceedings to trial, fixes the date by which any pre-trial checklist must be filed, fixes any pre-trial review, and fixes the trial date. Under rule 30.3 the parties must try to agree directions and file them at least seven days beforehand, and if the court approves agreed directions the hearing is cancelled.

Question 49Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Part 31 of the Cyprus Civil Procedure Rules 2023 distinguishes General Disclosure from Special Disclosure of documents. How do their scopes differ?

  1. General Disclosure is automatic and covers the documents a party relies on plus those needed for the other parties and the court to understand its case, whereas Special Disclosure is request-based and reaches specified documents or narrow categories that may reasonably support any party's case, including by adversely affecting another party's case Correct answer.
  2. General Disclosure automatically covers every document that adversely affects any party's case, so Special Disclosure adds nothing and is never ordered
  3. Both are automatic and identical in scope; the only difference is the deadline for filing them
  4. General Disclosure is request-based and Special Disclosure is automatic once the defence is filed

Explanation

Rule 31.2(3) defines General Disclosure as the documents in a party's possession, custody, control or power on which it intends to rely, or which are necessary for the other parties and the court to understand its case, and rule 31.4(1) requires it at least 14 days before the case management hearing. Rule 31.2(4) defines Special Disclosure as disclosure of specified documents or categories that may reasonably support any party's case, including by adversely affecting another party's case, and it is obtained by a request under rule 31.5 using Form 46. Cyprus therefore did not adopt the English automatic standard-disclosure duty to hand over adverse documents.

Question 50Cyprus legal study: identify the source, cause of action and requested task

Under the Civil Procedure Law (Cap. 6) in Cyprus, which of the following is a recognized method of executing and enforcing a final monetary judgment debt?

  1. Writ of execution on movable property, charging memo on immovable property, and Garnishee Order (κατάσχεση εις χείρας τρίτου) Correct answer.
  2. Automatic transfer of the judgment debt to a guarantor named by the creditor without any application
  3. Repossession and sale of the debtor's immovable property by the creditor without a court order
  4. Automatic set-off of the judgment debt against any social insurance benefits the debtor receives, without a court order

Explanation

Cap. 6 provides the statutory machinery for enforcing judgments: a writ of execution against movables sold by the bailiff, registration of a charging memo (μέμο) against immovable property, garnishee proceedings attaching debts owed to the debtor by third parties such as banks, and examination of the judgment debtor leading to a monthly instalment order. Parts 47 to 58 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 now govern the procedure for these methods.