DAT Reading Comprehension study materials
DAT Reading Comprehension study resources

DAT Reading Comprehension flashcards

DAT Reading Comprehension · Build recall with a focused review session.

33 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.

Explicit detail question
A question asking for information stated directly in the passage. The correct choice paraphrases the text; the wrong choices add claims, reverse cause and effect, or change quantities and scope.
Scope shift distractor
A wrong answer that changes the passage's qualifiers, converting some into all, often into always, or a specific group into a general population. The stated claim no longer matches the choice.
Line-reference strategy
When a question cites specific lines, read the sentence before and after as well. The tested detail often depends on context outside the cited line, and answers may hinge on adjacent sentences.
EXCEPT question rule
A negatively phrased question asks which choice is not supported. Three choices will be verifiable in the passage; the remaining one is either contradicted or absent, and it is the answer.
Sequence markers
Words such as first, then, after, and subsequently that establish order. Detail questions frequently test the order of events, so track these markers while reading the passage.
Main idea definition
The topic plus the author's specific claim about it. A choice naming only the topic is too broad; a choice covering one paragraph is too narrow. The whole passage must support it.
Too-broad answer trap
A main-idea distractor that extends beyond the passage's scope, claiming more than the text supports. It may sound important but is not defensible from the passage as written.
Too-narrow answer trap
A main-idea distractor that accurately restates a single paragraph or detail but does not capture the passage's overall claim. Supporting evidence is not the main idea.
Purpose verbs
Verbs describing what the author does: describe, explain, argue, compare, criticize, reconcile, or evaluate. Matching the passage's structure to the right verb identifies the primary purpose.
Thesis placement
The main claim usually appears in the first paragraph and is restated or refined in the last. The concluding sentence often reveals the author's overall aim most clearly.
Two-view main idea
When a passage presents two competing positions, the main idea usually concerns their relationship, such as which is stronger or how they can be reconciled, not either view alone.
Valid inference test
An inference must follow necessarily from stated evidence plus minimal common knowledge. If a choice merely could be true, it is not supported strongly enough to be correct.
Qualified vs. absolute
Choices using likely, suggests, or may usually reflect defensible inferences. Choices using always, never, or proves usually overstate what the passage supports and can be eliminated.
Contrast-marker implication
Words such as however, although, and yet often carry an implied point the author stops short of stating. The unstated contrast is a frequent target of inference questions.
Author's assumption
An unstated belief that must be true for the author's argument to hold. Inference questions may ask what the passage implies about this necessary condition.
Unsupported extrapolation
An inference distractor that extends the passage's claim beyond its stated time frame, population, or setting. The original evidence does not cover the new situation described.
Predict before choosing
Formulate the likely answer from the passage before reading the options. Inference distractors often reuse passage wording in a false relationship, so prior prediction reduces their pull.
Tone calibration
Attitude choices differ in degree: skeptical is milder than dismissive, and cautious optimism is milder than enthusiasm. Select the choice matching the passage's actual level of evaluation.
Evaluative language
Adjectives, adverbs, and judgment verbs such as flawed, promising, merely, or unfortunately reveal attitude more reliably than factual nouns or neutral descriptions of events.
Neutral tone indicator
When an author reports findings without evaluative words, the correct tone is objective or detached. Assuming advocacy where none is expressed produces a wrong answer.
Hedging signals
Words such as seems, appears, and tends to indicate caution rather than certainty or rejection. Hedged passages support a tentative or qualified tone, not a confident one.
Speaker vs. author attitude
The author's attitude toward a subject may differ from the attitude of a researcher quoted in the passage. Tone questions about the author require separating the two voices.
Style descriptors
Labels for how a passage is written: technical, conversational, polemical, detached, or ironic. Style questions target diction and sentence structure rather than the passage's content.
Substitution test
Insert each answer choice into the original sentence and check both grammar and logic. The correct option must fit the sentence's syntax and preserve its meaning.
Secondary meaning trap
The tested word often carries an uncommon secondary meaning, while the most familiar meaning is offered as a distractor. Context, not frequency, determines the correct sense.
Context clue types
Nearby signals that fix a word's meaning: restatement (that is, in other words), contrast (but, rather), example (such as), and cause-effect relationships within the sentence.
Connotation contrast
Synonyms can differ in evaluative charge, as thrifty differs from stingy. The correct vocabulary answer matches the passage's attitude, not just the dictionary meaning.
Part-of-speech check
Determine the tested word's grammatical role in the sentence. If it functions as a noun, verb-only options are automatically wrong regardless of meaning.
Structural map
A mental outline of the passage: thesis, evidence, counterargument, rebuttal, and conclusion. Organization questions are answered by locating a detail within this map.
Transition logic
Transition words encode relationships: however and yet signal contrast, therefore and thus signal conclusion, and for example signals illustration. These words reveal how ideas connect.
Paragraph function
The rhetorical job a paragraph performs: qualifying a claim, conceding a point, illustrating with evidence, or rebutting an objection. Function questions ask for this role, not the content.
Why-mention questions
Questions asking why the author mentions something require its rhetorical function, such as providing evidence or introducing a counterexample, rather than a summary of what it is.
Concluding paragraph role
The final paragraph typically extends, qualifies, or applies the thesis rather than introducing a wholly new topic. Structural questions often target this closing move.