The Hail-Damaged Warehouse and the 74-Day Silence
On May 8, a hailstorm struck a 22,000-square-foot warehouse in Dover. The insured, a packaging company, reported a roof claim the same day. The insurer's engineer inspected on May 20 and concluded the dents were 'cosmetic' and the roof had four years of useful life left; it offered $38,000 for gutters and skylights. The insured's roofing contractor says replacement is required at $410,000 because granule loss and fractured shingles will leak. The policy has replacement cost, a $25,000 deductible, an appraisal clause, and a two-year suit-limitation clause. The public adjuster submits a documented demand on August 1. The insurer does not respond in writing for 74 days, then sends a $38,000 check marked 'full and final.' The insured's business has had to place 14 buckets and close two loading bays.
1. What should the public adjuster do immediately about the $38,000 'full and final' check and the lack of a written response?
Read the worked answer
The adjuster should not let the insured cash the check without a written reservation of rights; cashing a check marked 'full and final' can create an accord-and-satisfaction defense. The adjuster should send a written objection stating that the check is not accepted as full payment, that the claim remains open, and that the insured reserves all rights under the policy and appraisal clause. The adjuster should also demand a written coverage position identifying the policy provisions relied on and the factual basis for the cosmetic-damage conclusion. Delaware's unfair claims settlement practices rules require insurers to act promptly and to give reasonable explanations for denials; a 74-day silence after a documented demand is a regulatory issue, though the adjuster should document it rather than assume it creates an automatic damages remedy. The adjuster should preserve the envelope, check, and any transmittal letter, and should ask the insurer to confirm in writing that the claim is not closed.
2. Compare invoking appraisal with filing suit. What factors should the adjuster weigh?
Read the worked answer
Appraisal is usually the faster and cheaper path when the dispute is only about the amount of loss, not coverage. The policy's appraisal clause likely allows either party to demand appraisal after an impasse; the adjuster should document the impasse created by the insurer's $38,000 position versus the contractor's $410,000 estimate. Appraisal can resolve replacement cost and scope, but it cannot decide coverage, bad faith, or the meaning of the policy, and the award may not include business income or code upgrades unless the clause and submission include them. Suit may be necessary for coverage denials, delay damages, or a declaratory judgment, but the two-year suit-limitation clause and litigation cost are significant. The adjuster should also consider whether the insured's business interruption is continuing and whether a reservation of rights or a partial payment can fund temporary repairs. The adjuster cannot give legal advice, so coverage counsel should evaluate the suit deadline and bad-faith claim.
3. Draft the substance of the written demand and explain how the adjuster should document the business interruption.
Read the worked answer
The demand should state the date of loss, the policy numbers, the claimed cause of loss, and the amount demanded; it should attach the contractor's replacement-cost estimate, photographs, the engineer's report if available, and a chronology showing the 74-day nonresponse. It should ask the insurer to withdraw the 'full and final' language, reopen the claim, and provide a written coverage determination. It should invoke appraisal if the amount remains disputed and reserve the right to amend the demand. For business interruption, the adjuster should build a schedule of lost production or extra expense by week, showing the two closed loading bays, temporary labor, rental equipment, and any lost contracts. The adjuster should obtain the insured's pre-loss financial statements and post-loss sales records, and should document mitigation such as buckets, tarps, and temporary repairs. The goal is to separate roof replacement from interior damage and to prove the period of restoration with objective evidence.