The Child Who Won't Open
A 6-year-old girl is brought in by her mother for a first dental visit. She has visible caries on #75 and #85 and reports 'ow' when the mother brushes those areas. The mother is anxious and says, 'She's terrified - she cried at the doctor's office last week.' The child is clinging to the mother and will not sit in the chair. The dentist has a 30-minute slot and wants to 'get the restorations done today' because the family drove 45 minutes. The assistant has a tell-show-do approach ready but has not yet used it. The mother asks, 'Can't you just give her something to calm her down?'
1. What is the appropriate approach for this first visit, and what should the team communicate to the mother?
Read the worked answer
The appropriate approach is behavioral, not pharmacological, on a first visit with a terrified 6-year-old. The 30-minute slot is not enough to do two restorations on a child who will not sit in the chair. Attempting it risks:
- A traumatic first experience that makes future visits harder.
- Incomplete or rushed treatment.
- Injury if the child moves during instrumentation.
What to do instead:
- Tell-show-do to introduce the chair, the mirror, and the light without treatment.
- A brief, positive visit - let her sit in the chair, count her teeth, and leave with a prize. This is an investment, not a waste.
- Assess the caries and plan the restorations for a subsequent, appropriately scheduled visit.
What to tell the mother:
- Be honest: 'Today is about helping her feel safe. We can't do the fillings safely in 30 minutes on a first visit, and forcing it would make the next visits harder.'
- Address the sedation question: sedation is a real option for some children, but it is not a first-visit decision and requires assessment, consent, and appropriate scheduling. It is not a quick fix for a 30-minute slot.
- Acknowledge the 45-minute drive and offer to schedule a longer visit next time so the trip is worthwhile.
2. The mother pushes back: 'I drove all this way - just do it.' How should the team respond, and what principle applies?
Read the worked answer
The team should hold the line, kindly and clearly, and explain the reasoning in terms the mother can accept:
- Safety: A child who is crying and moving during a restoration can be injured. That is not a hypothetical.
- Quality: Rushed restorations on a moving child are more likely to fail, meaning another visit anyway.
- Long-term: A traumatic first visit makes every future visit harder, which is worse for the child and the family.
The principle is the child's welfare over the schedule. The 45-minute drive is a real inconvenience, and the team should acknowledge it and make it right - offer a longer slot next time, or a morning appointment when the child is fresher, or a phone check-in before the drive.
What the team should not do is let the mother's pressure override the clinical judgment about what is safe and appropriate for a frightened 6-year-old on a first visit. That is the judgment call the exam is testing.