DELTA Module Three study plan

Map the Module Three assignment requirements (Part A rationale, Part B course design, Part C evaluation) onto a personal checklist and identify which evidence types each part demands

Draft a one-page profile of a chosen young-learner teaching context (age band, class size, contact hours, institutional constraints) that will anchor the Part B course design

Draft a parallel one-page profile of an adult-learner context (motivation types, learner needs, scheduling constraints) for comparison

Annotate two published course descriptions for young learners and adults, labelling how each handles needs analysis, syllabus type and assessment

Explain how cognitive and linguistic development stages in young learners constrain task choice, using at least three concrete classroom examples

Design three short activities that integrate movement, repetition and multisensory input for learners aged 5-8, and justify each in 60 words

Differentiate one activity for mixed-ability young learners at two proficiency levels and record the modifications

Write a 250-word rationale linking your young-learner course decisions to stated principles of child development

Classify the learners in your adult context by motivation orientation and learning history, and state the teaching implication of each classification

Design a needs-analysis instrument (questionnaire or interview schedule) with at least eight items and a scoring or coding plan

Compare two syllabus types (e.g. linear versus cyclical, or skills-based versus task-based) for the adult context and defend a choice

Draft an assessment plan for the adult course specifying two formative and one summative instrument with success criteria

Conduct a target-situation analysis for a named ESP setting, listing the communicative events, genres and tasks the learners must perform

Distinguish the ESP course from a general English course in a 200-word written justification citing learner needs and authenticity of materials

Adapt one authentic workplace text into a scaffolded classroom task at two difficulty levels

Identify five specialist lexical items and design a recycling plan across three lessons

Design one blended or fully online lesson sequence that specifies the technology, the learner interaction pattern and the rationale for each digital choice

Evaluate two digital tools against criteria of pedagogical fit, accessibility and data privacy, and record a reasoned recommendation

Analyse a multilingual classroom scenario and plan how to exploit learners' other languages as a resource rather than suppressing them

Write a 200-word statement on how language policy and status of English in a chosen multilingual setting shape classroom decisions

Synthesise your domain notes into a single annotated bibliography of at least ten sources, grouped by domain and tagged to the Part A criteria they support

Draft the Part A rationale (approximately 1,000 words) arguing for your course decisions with in-text citation of your sources

Cross-check every claim in the draft against a source or your own context evidence, and delete or support any unsupported assertion

Apply the assignment word-count and referencing conventions and log the changes made

Assemble the Part B course design so that every element (syllabus, materials, assessment) traces back to a claim made in Part A

Write the Part C evaluation section, justifying two design choices and honestly acknowledging one limitation with a proposed alternative

Verify that the young-learner, adult, ESP, digital and multilingual strands are each explicitly evidenced somewhere in the submission

Reduce the draft to the required word limit without losing any criterion coverage, and record what was cut

Self-assess the draft against the assessment criteria and produce a numbered list of weaknesses with a fix for each

Proofread for referencing accuracy, consistent terminology and clarity, correcting at least ten specific issues

Rehearse a five-minute spoken defence of your course design and record it for self-review

Submit the final assignment and file a personal reflection on which domain you would strengthen next