Part-66 Module 10 study plan
Part-66 Module 10 · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Continuing Airworthiness
Define continuing airworthiness and list the responsibilities of the owner/operator versus the maintenance organisation
Explain the airworthiness limit concept: life-limited parts, maintenance task intervals and permitted deviations
Describe the role of the type certificate holder, supplemental type certificates and approved design data in keeping an aircraft airworthy
Trace how a defect found in service flows from discovery through deferral, rectification and record entry
Your checkpoint
A one-page process map of the continuing airworthiness loop (defect → assessment → rectification → record → release) with each step annotated in your own words
Continuing Airworthiness & Regulatory Framework
Interpret maintenance programme content: scheduled tasks, intervals, escalation and approved variations
Differentiate mandatory continuing airworthiness information from non-mandatory service information and state the action each requires
Summarise how airworthiness directives are issued, recorded and embodied, including the meaning of an alternative method of compliance
Map which regulation-making body sets the requirement at each stage of the directive process
Your checkpoint
A comparison table of three categories of continuing airworthiness information (directive, mandatory service bulletin, recommended service bulletin) showing issuer, obligation and documentation produced
Regulatory Framework & Continuing Airworthiness
Outline the regulatory framework structure: international convention level, regional rule-making level, national authority level
Explain how a national authority delegates and oversees maintenance standards and what an acceptable means of compliance is
Describe the role of the maintenance review board and the industry steering committee in producing a maintenance programme
Link two continuing airworthiness requirements back to the regulation that creates them
Your checkpoint
A layered diagram of the regulatory framework with at least six named bodies/instruments placed at the correct layer, plus a short note on how a rule becomes applicable to a maintenance organisation
Applicable National and International Requirements (ICAO, national authorities) & Regulatory Framework
Summarise the ICAO annex provisions that govern personnel licensing and aircraft maintenance, and distinguish standards from recommended practices
Explain how national requirements differ from and build on ICAO standards, including the concept of differences filed
Compare certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance across two national/regional systems
State the record-keeping and reporting obligations that recur across international requirements
Your checkpoint
A two-column comparison of ICAO standards versus national implementing rules for maintenance personnel and organisations, covering at least five points of comparison
Approved Maintenance Organisations & Certifying Staff - Maintenance
Describe the scope of an approved maintenance organisation approval and the ratings under which work may be performed
Explain the role, qualifications and limitations of certifying staff, support staff and category-specific authorisations
Outline the organisation's obligations for facility, tooling, stores, training and quality monitoring
Explain how a finding from a quality audit becomes a corrective action and how the authority verifies closure
Distinguish the privileges and limits of a certifying staff authorisation from those of a component or line certifying staff
Your checkpoint
A checklist of ten questions you would ask to audit whether a maintenance organisation's scope of approval actually matches the work in its hangar
Certification of Aircraft, Parts and Appliances & Certifying Staff - Maintenance
Explain what a certificate of release to service certifies and who is entitled to issue it
List the documentation required before release: work cards, parts traceability, test results and outstanding deferred items
Describe how parts and appliances are approved for installation, including the status of standard parts and uncertified parts
Explain the purpose and limits of an authorised release certificate for a component
Identify the circumstances in which an aircraft may be released with an accepted non-compliance or deferred defect
Your checkpoint
A completed sample release-to-service decision sheet for three hypothetical scenarios (routine check, component replacement, deferred defect carried forward) with a justified decision for each
Air Operations & Certification of Aircraft, Parts and Appliances
Outline the operator's responsibilities that interact with maintenance: operational control, minimum equipment list use and defect reporting
Explain how a minimum equipment list entry is used to defer a defect and what conditions must be met before dispatch
Describe continuing airworthiness management tasks carried out on behalf of an operator
Link crew-reported defects to the maintenance and record-keeping chain
Your checkpoint
A worked example of a minimum equipment list deferral: entry conditions, maintenance action, placarding, documentation and the date by which rectification must occur
Continuing Airworthiness & Regulatory Framework & Applicable National and International Requirements (ICAO, national authorities) & Certifying Staff - Maintenance & Approved Maintenance Organisations & Certification of Aircraft, Parts and Appliances & Air Operations
Re-test every domain under timed conditions and log a score per domain
Rewrite your weakest three topic summaries from memory without notes
Resolve every flagged uncertain fact by checking an authoritative primary source
Consolidate record-keeping and release-to-service rules into a single revision sheet, since they appear across several domains
Your checkpoint
A timed 60-question self-test with per-domain scores recorded, plus a one-page final revision sheet covering releases, records and continuing airworthiness information
Milestones
Week 2: Can explain, without notes, how a defect leads to a directive and back into the maintenance programme - scored against your week 1 process map
Week 4: Regulatory-framework diagram complete and correct; self-test score of at least 70% on domains 10.1 and 10.7
Week 6: Can issue a defensible release-to-service decision for all three scenario types in the week 6 deliverable, citing the documents relied on
Week 7: All seven domains have at least one set of notes and one self-test attempt recorded
Week 8: Timed self-test complete at 75% or above overall with no single domain below 65%