Egyptian Board Clinical Pathology study materials
Egyptian Board Clinical Pathology study resources

Egyptian Board Clinical Pathology: Laboratory Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics

Egyptian Board Clinical Pathology · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Laboratory Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics

Molecular and genetics questions test whether you can choose the right test, control the pre-analytical phase, and report a variant with an honest level of certainty.

Core rules

  • Sample type: EDTA whole blood for germline DNA, plasma for cell-free DNA, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for somatic testing; record tumour cellularity (often at least 20%) because it sets the detectable variant allele fraction.
  • PCR detects nucleic acid, not living organisms; a positive result after treatment may reflect non-viable DNA.
  • Real-time PCR quantification uses Ct/Cq values inversely related to target amount; each assay needs a validated cut-off and limit of detection.
  • Karyotyping detects balanced rearrangements and aneuploidy at roughly 5–10 Mb resolution; FISH targets specific loci; chromosomal microarray detects copy-number gains and losses but not balanced translocations.
  • Sanger sequencing suits single or few amplicons; next-generation panels require defined coverage (commonly ≥100× for germline, higher for somatic) plus review of strand bias and variant allele fraction.
  • HGVS nomenclature uses c. for coding DNA and p. for protein, with the reference transcript stated.
  • Variant classification follows the ACMG/AMP five-tier scheme: pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of uncertain significance, likely benign, benign. A classification is not a clinical diagnosis.
  • Report only what is validated and consented; germline results have implications for relatives, somatic results guide therapy.
  • Controls each run: positive, negative, extraction blank and no-template control.

Worked example

A heterozygous nonsense variant (c.1207C>T, p.Arg403Ter) is found in a gene where haploinsufficiency is an established mechanism. It is absent from population databases, the phenotype fits, and parental testing shows it is de novo. A reasonable classification is likely pathogenic, citing PVS1, PM2 and PS2, with the phenotype-specific evidence stated. The report should show the criteria applied rather than simply announcing that a mutation was found.

Traps

  • Reporting a variant of uncertain significance as pathogenic and prompting surgery.
  • Ignoring population allele frequency, which differs in impact between dominant and recessive disease.
  • Applying a somatic assay's limit of detection to a germline question.
  • Cross-sample contamination producing a false heterozygous call.