EMLE study plan
EMLE · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Microeconomics (consumer theory, producer theory, market structures)
Derive Marshallian and Hicksian demand for Cobb-Douglas, quasi-linear and perfect-complements preferences, and state the Slutsky decomposition for each case
Solve consumer choice problems under a budget constraint, distinguishing substitution from income effects and identifying Giffen behaviour
Compute elasticities of demand (price, income, cross-price) from a given demand function and classify the good accordingly
Explain revealed preference axioms and use them to test a small set of consumption bundles for consistency
Your checkpoint
A one-page formula sheet plus 12 fully worked consumer-theory problems with answers checked against first-order conditions
Microeconomics (consumer theory, producer theory, market structures)
Derive short-run and long-run cost functions from a production function, including returns to scale and cost duality
Analyse profit maximisation and shut-down conditions for a price-taking firm, and distinguish economic from accounting profit
Compare monopoly, monopolistic competition and oligopoly outcomes, computing deadweight loss from a linear demand and constant marginal cost
Solve a Cournot duopoly and a Stackelberg leader-follower game numerically and interpret the equilibrium quantities
Your checkpoint
A comparative table of market structures (pricing rule, output, efficiency loss, entry conditions) with at least two worked numerical examples per structure
Law and Economics - core concepts (coasean bargaining, efficiency, externalities)
State the Coase theorem precisely, including its assumptions, and identify when bargaining fails to reach efficiency
Distinguish Pareto efficiency, Kaldor-Hicks efficiency and social welfare functions, and apply each to a nuisance dispute
Model a negative externality with private and social marginal cost curves and compute the Pigouvian tax that restores the efficient quantity
Explain the difference between Coasean bargaining, Pigouvian taxation and tradable permits in terms of transaction costs and information requirements
Apply the Hand formula to a negligence scenario and compare the result with a strict-liability rule
Your checkpoint
A 600-word analytical memo resolving one externality problem three ways (bargaining, tax, permits) with a diagram description and a conclusion on institutional choice
Institutional and Comparative Law Foundations (civil law vs common law)
Contrast the historical development of civil law and common law traditions, naming the key codification and precedent-setting moments
Distinguish the roles of codified statutes, doctrine and precedent in each tradition and explain how each affects legal certainty and adaptation
Explain the economic argument that precedent generates information externalities and that codification reduces decision costs
Compare judicial reasoning styles (deductive from code versus analogical from cases) using a hypothetical contract dispute
Identify the institutional features of mixed jurisdictions and supranational legal orders and their implications for forum shopping
Your checkpoint
A two-column comparison document (civil law versus common law) covering sources of law, judicial role, fact-finding, and economic consequences, with 8 cited points per column
Contract, Tort and Property Law - economic analysis
Analyse contract formation and interpretation through the lens of transaction costs, asymmetric information and default rules
Explain efficient breach, expectation versus reliance damages, and when specific performance is the better remedy
Apply the cheapest-cost-avoider principle and comparative negligence to a tort scenario, computing expected liability under each rule
Explain the economic justification for property rights, including the tragedy of the commons, the anticommons and the bundle-of-rights conception
Compare remedies for takings and nuisance using the concepts of property rules and liability rules
Your checkpoint
Three short case analyses (one contract, one tort, one property), each 350 words, each ending with an explicit efficiency verdict and the remedy that best supports it
Public Law, Regulation and Competition Law - economic analysis & Quantitative and Analytical Reasoning (basic statistics, game theory, graphs)
Explain the economic rationale for regulation, including natural monopoly, information asymmetry and public goods, and identify regulatory capture risks
Apply the relevant market definition and market power concepts in competition law, and distinguish per se prohibitions from rule-of-reason analysis
Compute a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index for a given market and interpret concentration thresholds
Solve dominance and Nash equilibrium problems in 2x2 normal-form games, including mixed strategies and prisoner's dilemma variants
Read and interpret a basic regression output, identifying coefficient sign, significance and the limits of causal inference
Your checkpoint
A problem set of 15 mixed items (10 game theory and statistics, 5 competition-law applications) with worked solutions and a short note on each statistical limitation
Academic English and Argumentative Writing
Structure an argumentative essay with a clear thesis, signposted reasoning and a counterargument that is engaged rather than dismissed
Write precise definitions of technical terms (efficiency, externality, precedent, dominance) that a non-specialist could apply
Edit for concision by cutting nominalisations, hedging stacks and redundant connectives from a draft
Use evidence and citation conventions appropriately in legal-economic writing without overstating empirical claims
Produce a timed 45-minute essay under exam conditions and self-assess against a rubric covering structure, accuracy and clarity
Your checkpoint
One timed exam-style essay of 900 to 1,000 words on a law-and-economics question, plus a marked self-assessment identifying three concrete weaknesses
Microeconomics (consumer theory, producer theory, market structures) & Law and Economics - core concepts (coasean bargaining, efficiency, externalities) & Institutional and Comparative Law Foundations (civil law vs common law) & Contract, Tort and Property Law - economic analysis & Public Law, Regulation and Competition Law - economic analysis & Quantitative and Analytical Reasoning (basic statistics, game theory, graphs) & Academic English and Argumentative Writing
Consolidate all seven domains by re-deriving the ten most examinable results from memory (Slutsky, Coase, Pigou, Hand formula, HHI, Nash equilibrium, efficient breach)
Complete two full-length mock exams under timed conditions and score them against the answer keys
Diagnose recurring error patterns and target the two weakest domains with focused re-study
Rehearse diagram drawing and numerical computation speed so that quantitative items are completed within the time budget
Your checkpoint
Two scored mock exams with an error log listing every mistake, its domain, its root cause and the corrective action taken
Milestones
Week 2: Can derive cost functions and solve a Cournot equilibrium from scratch, without notes, in under 20 minutes each
Week 4: Can explain Coase, Pigou and the civil-versus-common-law contrast in a single coherent 10-minute verbal answer with no factual errors
Week 6: Scores at least 70 percent on the 15-item mixed problem set, with all game-theory items correct
Week 7: Timed essay is completed within 45 minutes and meets at least 4 of 5 rubric criteria on structure and accuracy
Week 8: Both mock exams completed within time, with a combined average at or above the target pass mark and every error logged