EMLE study materials
EMLE study resources

EMLE study plan

EMLE · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Microeconomics (consumer theory, producer theory, market structures)

  • Derive Marshallian and Hicksian demand for Cobb-Douglas, quasi-linear and perfect-complements preferences, and state the Slutsky decomposition for each case

  • Solve consumer choice problems under a budget constraint, distinguishing substitution from income effects and identifying Giffen behaviour

  • Compute elasticities of demand (price, income, cross-price) from a given demand function and classify the good accordingly

  • Explain revealed preference axioms and use them to test a small set of consumption bundles for consistency

Your checkpoint

A one-page formula sheet plus 12 fully worked consumer-theory problems with answers checked against first-order conditions

Week 2

Microeconomics (consumer theory, producer theory, market structures)

  • Derive short-run and long-run cost functions from a production function, including returns to scale and cost duality

  • Analyse profit maximisation and shut-down conditions for a price-taking firm, and distinguish economic from accounting profit

  • Compare monopoly, monopolistic competition and oligopoly outcomes, computing deadweight loss from a linear demand and constant marginal cost

  • Solve a Cournot duopoly and a Stackelberg leader-follower game numerically and interpret the equilibrium quantities

Your checkpoint

A comparative table of market structures (pricing rule, output, efficiency loss, entry conditions) with at least two worked numerical examples per structure

Week 3

Law and Economics - core concepts (coasean bargaining, efficiency, externalities)

  • State the Coase theorem precisely, including its assumptions, and identify when bargaining fails to reach efficiency

  • Distinguish Pareto efficiency, Kaldor-Hicks efficiency and social welfare functions, and apply each to a nuisance dispute

  • Model a negative externality with private and social marginal cost curves and compute the Pigouvian tax that restores the efficient quantity

  • Explain the difference between Coasean bargaining, Pigouvian taxation and tradable permits in terms of transaction costs and information requirements

  • Apply the Hand formula to a negligence scenario and compare the result with a strict-liability rule

Your checkpoint

A 600-word analytical memo resolving one externality problem three ways (bargaining, tax, permits) with a diagram description and a conclusion on institutional choice

Week 4

Institutional and Comparative Law Foundations (civil law vs common law)

  • Contrast the historical development of civil law and common law traditions, naming the key codification and precedent-setting moments

  • Distinguish the roles of codified statutes, doctrine and precedent in each tradition and explain how each affects legal certainty and adaptation

  • Explain the economic argument that precedent generates information externalities and that codification reduces decision costs

  • Compare judicial reasoning styles (deductive from code versus analogical from cases) using a hypothetical contract dispute

  • Identify the institutional features of mixed jurisdictions and supranational legal orders and their implications for forum shopping

Your checkpoint

A two-column comparison document (civil law versus common law) covering sources of law, judicial role, fact-finding, and economic consequences, with 8 cited points per column

Week 5

Contract, Tort and Property Law - economic analysis

  • Analyse contract formation and interpretation through the lens of transaction costs, asymmetric information and default rules

  • Explain efficient breach, expectation versus reliance damages, and when specific performance is the better remedy

  • Apply the cheapest-cost-avoider principle and comparative negligence to a tort scenario, computing expected liability under each rule

  • Explain the economic justification for property rights, including the tragedy of the commons, the anticommons and the bundle-of-rights conception

  • Compare remedies for takings and nuisance using the concepts of property rules and liability rules

Your checkpoint

Three short case analyses (one contract, one tort, one property), each 350 words, each ending with an explicit efficiency verdict and the remedy that best supports it

Week 6

Public Law, Regulation and Competition Law - economic analysis & Quantitative and Analytical Reasoning (basic statistics, game theory, graphs)

  • Explain the economic rationale for regulation, including natural monopoly, information asymmetry and public goods, and identify regulatory capture risks

  • Apply the relevant market definition and market power concepts in competition law, and distinguish per se prohibitions from rule-of-reason analysis

  • Compute a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index for a given market and interpret concentration thresholds

  • Solve dominance and Nash equilibrium problems in 2x2 normal-form games, including mixed strategies and prisoner's dilemma variants

  • Read and interpret a basic regression output, identifying coefficient sign, significance and the limits of causal inference

Your checkpoint

A problem set of 15 mixed items (10 game theory and statistics, 5 competition-law applications) with worked solutions and a short note on each statistical limitation

Week 7

Academic English and Argumentative Writing

  • Structure an argumentative essay with a clear thesis, signposted reasoning and a counterargument that is engaged rather than dismissed

  • Write precise definitions of technical terms (efficiency, externality, precedent, dominance) that a non-specialist could apply

  • Edit for concision by cutting nominalisations, hedging stacks and redundant connectives from a draft

  • Use evidence and citation conventions appropriately in legal-economic writing without overstating empirical claims

  • Produce a timed 45-minute essay under exam conditions and self-assess against a rubric covering structure, accuracy and clarity

Your checkpoint

One timed exam-style essay of 900 to 1,000 words on a law-and-economics question, plus a marked self-assessment identifying three concrete weaknesses

Week 8

Microeconomics (consumer theory, producer theory, market structures) & Law and Economics - core concepts (coasean bargaining, efficiency, externalities) & Institutional and Comparative Law Foundations (civil law vs common law) & Contract, Tort and Property Law - economic analysis & Public Law, Regulation and Competition Law - economic analysis & Quantitative and Analytical Reasoning (basic statistics, game theory, graphs) & Academic English and Argumentative Writing

  • Consolidate all seven domains by re-deriving the ten most examinable results from memory (Slutsky, Coase, Pigou, Hand formula, HHI, Nash equilibrium, efficient breach)

  • Complete two full-length mock exams under timed conditions and score them against the answer keys

  • Diagnose recurring error patterns and target the two weakest domains with focused re-study

  • Rehearse diagram drawing and numerical computation speed so that quantitative items are completed within the time budget

Your checkpoint

Two scored mock exams with an error log listing every mistake, its domain, its root cause and the corrective action taken

Milestones

Week 2: Can derive cost functions and solve a Cournot equilibrium from scratch, without notes, in under 20 minutes each

Week 4: Can explain Coase, Pigou and the civil-versus-common-law contrast in a single coherent 10-minute verbal answer with no factual errors

Week 6: Scores at least 70 percent on the 15-item mixed problem set, with all game-theory items correct

Week 7: Timed essay is completed within 45 minutes and meets at least 4 of 5 rubric criteria on structure and accuracy

Week 8: Both mock exams completed within time, with a combined average at or above the target pass mark and every error logged