I85PREP
⌘ K
Institute of Advocacy Exam study materials
Institute of Advocacy Exam study resources

Institute of Advocacy Exam practice questions

One question at a time. Build your Institute of Advocacy Exam understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is instructed in a matter against a former client of the same firm. The advocate personally holds confidential information from that earlier retainer that is relevant to the new matter. What is the primary professional obligation in this conflict situation?

  1. Accept the retainer because the earlier client is no longer a client and the duty of confidentiality ended with the retainer
  2. Accept the retainer and disclose the earlier information to the new client so both sides are treated equally
  3. Decline the new retainer unless the former client gives informed consent, because confidential information from the earlier matter must not be used against them Correct answer.
  4. Accept the retainer as long as the advocate personally does not refer to the earlier file during the new proceedings

Explanation

A lawyer who holds confidential information from a former client must not act against that client in a related matter without informed consent, because the duty of confidentiality survives the end of the retainer. The risk of inadvertent use of the information is what the rule guards against, not just deliberate disclosure.

Question 2Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

During a hearing an advocate discovers that opposing counsel has failed to cite a controlling authority that is directly adverse to their case. What is the advocate's proper course?

  1. Remain silent, since the advocate's duty is to the client and opposing counsel bears responsibility for their own research
  2. Cite the authority to the court and explain its effect, because a lawyer must not mislead the tribunal on the law Correct answer.
  3. Write to the presiding judge privately after the hearing to point out the omission
  4. Mention the authority only if the client expressly instructs the advocate to do so

Explanation

The duty of candour to the tribunal requires a lawyer to draw the court's attention to adverse legal authority that is directly in point and not cited by the other side. This duty overrides the ordinary adversarial instinct to leave gaps in the opponent's case unaddressed.

Question 3Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

A client proposes to give evidence that the advocate knows from the client's own admissions to be false. How should the advocate respond?

  1. Refuse to call or examine the client on that evidence and seek to withdraw if the client insists on perjury Correct answer.
  2. Present the evidence but tell the jury in closing that the client may have been lying
  3. Quietly omit the client's evidence from the case without telling the client or the court
  4. Call the client to give the false evidence and test it through cross-examination by the other side

Explanation

A lawyer must not knowingly present false evidence or allow a client to give perjured testimony. The advocate must decline to examine on the false account and, if the client persists, apply to withdraw without disclosing the client's confidences to the court.

Question 4Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

Which statement best describes the scope of legal professional privilege attaching to communications between an advocate and client?

  1. It applies only to communications made after litigation has actually commenced
  2. It applies to confidential communications made for the purpose of obtaining or giving legal advice, and continues after the relationship ends Correct answer.
  3. It can be waived by the advocate alone without reference to the client
  4. It applies only to written communications exchanged in the course of a retainer

Explanation

Legal advice privilege covers confidential communications between lawyer and client for the purpose of seeking or giving legal advice, and it subsists indefinitely after the retainer ends. The privilege belongs to the client, not the lawyer.

Question 5Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is offered a brief by a solicitor who is the advocate's spouse. The matter is a straightforward commercial dispute in which the spouse has no personal interest. What is the correct approach?

  1. Refuse the brief automatically because any family connection between instructing solicitor and advocate is prohibited
  2. Accept the brief only if the client, the spouse and the advocate all consent after full disclosure of the relationship Correct answer.
  3. Accept the brief, since a personal relationship with the instructing solicitor is irrelevant to professional conduct
  4. Accept the brief but arrange for a colleague to sign all correspondence with the solicitor

Explanation

A personal relationship with the instructing solicitor is not an automatic bar, but it must be disclosed so that the client can decide whether to consent. Informed consent from all affected parties addresses the risk of a perceived conflict.

Question 6Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

A barrister accepts a brief on a fixed fee and, before the hearing, the solicitor asks the barrister to return the brief so a cheaper junior can be instructed. What is the barrister's obligation under the cab-rank principle?

  1. Refuse to return the brief because a barrister may never hand back an accepted brief
  2. Return the brief immediately because the solicitor is the client for this purpose and may reallocate work freely
  3. Return the brief only if the barrister agrees that the fee is unreasonable
  4. Consider the request in good faith, but the barrister is not obliged to return a brief merely because a cheaper option exists Correct answer.

Explanation

Under the cab-rank rule a barrister must accept instructions in a field in which they practise, subject to limited exceptions, and is not required to surrender a brief simply because the instructing solicitor prefers a cheaper advocate. The barrister should respond professionally and consider the client's interests.

Question 7Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate receives a document from the opposing side that appears to have been sent in error and contains privileged advice to the opponent. What should the advocate do?

  1. Forward it to the client for instructions on whether to use it
  2. Read it and use it if it helps the client, since the opponent's mistake is their own problem
  3. Return or destroy the document without reading further and notify the sender of the error Correct answer.
  4. Keep the document but refrain from relying on it in court

Explanation

Where a lawyer receives material that is obviously privileged and was clearly sent in error, the proper course is to stop reading, return or delete it, and notify the sender. Exploiting an opponent's inadvertent disclosure undermines the administration of justice and breaches the duty of integrity.

Question 8Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

Which of the following best describes the advocate's duty regarding client money held in a trust or client account?

  1. Client money must be kept separate from the advocate's own funds and accounted for accurately, with proper records maintained Correct answer.
  2. Client money may be used temporarily to cover office expenses if repaid within the month
  3. Client money may be mixed with office funds provided a running total is kept
  4. Client money need only be accounted for at the end of the financial year

Explanation

Client funds must be held separately from the lawyer's own money and recorded accurately, because commingling creates a risk of loss and makes tracing impossible. Proper accounting records are a core regulatory obligation.

Question 9Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is asked by a client to draft a witness statement that the client says the witness has agreed to sign, although the advocate has never spoken to the witness. What is the appropriate response?

  1. Prepare the statement but add a note that its accuracy has not been verified
  2. Draft the statement as instructed and send it directly to the witness for signature
  3. Decline to prepare a statement purporting to be the witness's own words without verifying its content with the witness Correct answer.
  4. Draft the statement and have the client obtain the signature, since the client takes responsibility

Explanation

A witness statement must reflect the witness's own evidence, so the advocate should not draft one purporting to be the witness's words without speaking to the witness. Preparing evidence the advocate cannot verify risks misleading the court.

Question 10Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is instructed in a matter in which the advocate previously acted as a mediator between the same parties. What is the principal concern?

  1. The advocate risks a conflict because confidential information from the mediation may be used against a party Correct answer.
  2. The advocate may act only if the mediation lasted less than one day
  3. The advocate may act if the parties agree that the earlier mediation is irrelevant
  4. There is no concern because mediation is not a legal service

Explanation

A lawyer who acted as mediator receives confidential information from all sides and cannot later act for one party against another in the same dispute without informed consent. The risk is that mediation confidences could be used to the disadvantage of a former participant.

Question 11Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

Under the advocate's duty to act in the client's best interests, which of the following is a proper limitation on that duty?

  1. The advocate must act in the client's best interests subject to the duty to the court and to professional obligations Correct answer.
  2. The advocate must pursue any lawful objective the client chooses regardless of the effect on third parties
  3. The advocate must follow the client's instructions even where they require misleading the court
  4. The advocate must prioritise the client's interests over all other professional duties

Explanation

The duty to act in the client's best interests operates alongside, not above, the duties to the court and to uphold the rule of law. Where these conflict, the duty to the court prevails.

Question 12Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

A pupil barrister is asked by a senior colleague to sign a document prepared by the senior that the pupil believes contains a misleading statement of fact. What should the pupil do?

  1. Raise the concern with the senior and decline to sign unless the statement is corrected Correct answer.
  2. Sign the document because a pupil must follow the instructions of the supervising barrister
  3. Sign the document and report the matter only if the court later raises it
  4. Sign the document but record a private note of the concern

Explanation

Every advocate, including a pupil, is personally responsible for the accuracy of documents they sign and must not sign a document containing a misleading statement. The proper step is to raise the concern and refuse to sign until it is corrected.

Question 13Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

Which of the following best describes the advocate's obligation when taking instructions from a client with a language barrier?

  1. The advocate should ensure the client understands the advice and instructions through an appropriate interpreter Correct answer.
  2. The advocate may rely on the client's signature on an engagement letter as proof of understanding
  3. The advocate may proceed without an interpreter if the client appears to nod in agreement
  4. The advocate may proceed using a family member as interpreter without checking for conflicts of interest

Explanation

Effective communication is essential to informed instructions, so an advocate must take reasonable steps to ensure the client understands, including using a competent interpreter. This supports the client's ability to give informed consent and instructions.

Question 14Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is offered a gift of significant value by a client after a successful case. What is the appropriate approach?

  1. Decline the gift or seek guidance, because accepting gifts of significant value risks a conflict with the duty of independence Correct answer.
  2. Accept the gift only if the client is a long-standing client
  3. Accept the gift and record it in the firm's gift register without further consideration
  4. Accept the gift because it is a personal token of gratitude unrelated to professional conduct

Explanation

Accepting gifts of significant value can compromise the advocate's independence and create an appearance of improper influence. The prudent course is to decline or seek guidance in accordance with the applicable regulatory rules.

Question 15Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

What is the principal purpose of the advocate's duty to maintain client confidentiality?

  1. To protect the advocate from criticism by the client
  2. To allow the advocate to withhold information from the court in all circumstances
  3. To protect the client's information from disclosure and to encourage full and frank communication with the advocate Correct answer.
  4. To prevent the client from ever disclosing information to third parties

Explanation

Confidentiality protects the client's information and underpins the trust needed for clients to communicate fully with their lawyer. It is not absolute: it yields to the duty to the court and to statutory obligations.

Question 16Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate discovers that a client has misled the court in earlier proceedings in the same matter without the advocate's knowledge. What is the advocate's obligation?

  1. Advise the client to correct the position and, if the client refuses, take steps to withdraw and disclose as necessary to prevent the court being misled Correct answer.
  2. Continue the case and rely on the earlier misleading evidence if it assists the client
  3. Immediately report the client to the police without further consideration
  4. Say nothing, because the client's earlier conduct is outside the advocate's responsibility

Explanation

An advocate must not allow the court to remain misled, even by conduct that occurred before the advocate became involved. The advocate should advise correction and, if the client refuses, withdraw and disclose to the extent necessary to prevent the court being misled.

Question 17Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is instructed by two co-defendants whose defences are consistent at the outset but may diverge at trial. What is the correct approach?

  1. Accept instructions from both without further analysis because their defences are currently consistent
  2. Refuse to act for either defendant because joint representation is always prohibited
  3. Accept instructions from both and wait until the defences actually diverge before taking any step
  4. Assess the risk of a future conflict and decline joint instructions if a significant risk of divergence exists Correct answer.

Explanation

Joint representation is permissible only where there is no significant risk that the defences will diverge in a way that creates a conflict. The advocate must assess that risk at the outset and decline if it is material.

Question 18Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

Which of the following is a proper example of an advocate maintaining independence from the client?

  1. Adopting every case theory the client prefers without question
  2. Declining to adopt a case theory the advocate considers unsupported while explaining the reasons to the client Correct answer.
  3. Allowing the client to direct the advocate's cross-examination questions verbatim
  4. Following the client's instructions without advising on the merits

Explanation

Independence requires the advocate to exercise professional judgment and to advise the client candidly, rather than simply acting as a mouthpiece. The advocate should explain why a theory is unsupported while respecting the client's ultimate decision on objectives.

Question 19Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is asked to act in a matter where the advocate's own financial interest in an associated company would be affected by the outcome. What is the correct course?

  1. Decline the matter or disclose the interest and obtain informed consent, because a personal financial interest creates a conflict Correct answer.
  2. Act in the matter without disclosure because the interest is indirect
  3. Act in the matter but disclose the interest to the client after the hearing
  4. Act in the matter and rely on the client to discover the interest independently

Explanation

A personal financial interest in the outcome creates a conflict between the advocate's interest and the client's. The advocate must decline or make full disclosure and obtain informed consent, depending on the applicable rules.

Question 20Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

What does the cab-rank principle require of a barrister regarding the acceptance of briefs?

  1. A barrister must accept a brief only if the fee is at the top of the market rate
  2. A barrister may accept or decline briefs entirely at their discretion
  3. A barrister must accept any brief in a field in which they practise, subject to limited exceptions such as conflict or professional embarrassment Correct answer.
  4. A barrister must accept every brief offered regardless of the field of practice

Explanation

The cab-rank rule obliges a barrister to accept instructions in a field in which they practise, subject to exceptions such as conflict of interest, lack of competence, or professional embarrassment. It supports access to representation for unpopular clients.

Question 21Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

A solicitor instructs an advocate and provides a brief that the advocate believes is inadequate to present the client's case properly. What should the advocate do?

  1. Return the brief immediately without explanation
  2. Present the case as best as possible and accept the inadequate brief without comment
  3. Request the necessary information or material from the solicitor and, if it is not provided, consider whether to return the brief Correct answer.
  4. Prepare the missing material personally and charge the client without informing the solicitor

Explanation

The advocate should seek the information needed to present the case properly and, if the instructing solicitor fails to provide it, consider whether the brief can properly be conducted. This protects the client's interests and the advocate's professional obligations.

Question 22Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate learns that a colleague has been misappropriating client funds. What is the advocate's obligation?

  1. Report the matter to the relevant regulatory authority, because misappropriation of client funds is a serious breach that must be addressed Correct answer.
  2. Report the matter only if the client complains
  3. Keep silent because reporting a colleague breaches professional collegiality
  4. Confront the colleague privately and take no further action if the funds are repaid

Explanation

Misappropriation of client funds is a serious matter that must be reported to the regulatory authority, because it threatens clients and the integrity of the profession. Collegiality does not justify concealment of dishonesty.

Question 23Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

Which of the following best describes the advocate's duty regarding the use of social media in relation to ongoing proceedings?

  1. The advocate may post about the case after the first hearing because the risk of prejudice has passed
  2. The advocate may post about the case provided the client's name is not used
  3. The advocate must avoid public comment that could prejudice proceedings or breach client confidentiality Correct answer.
  4. The advocate may comment on the case if the comments are accurate

Explanation

Public comment on ongoing proceedings risks prejudicing the fair trial and breaching confidentiality, so advocates must exercise restraint on social media. Anonymising the client does not necessarily prevent identification or prejudice.

Question 24Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is asked to advise on a transaction that the advocate believes is lawful but which the client intends to use to harm a third party. What is the correct approach?

  1. Advise on the transaction and assist the client in carrying out the harmful purpose
  2. Decline to assist with the harmful purpose and advise the client on the legal position, because the advocate must not assist in wrongdoing Correct answer.
  3. Advise on the transaction only if the third party consents
  4. Advise on the transaction without regard to the client's intended use

Explanation

An advocate may advise on the legal position but must not assist a client in a course of action intended to harm a third party unlawfully. The advocate's duty of integrity limits the assistance that can properly be given.

Question 25Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is instructed in a matter that falls outside the advocate's area of competence but is offered at a high fee. What is the correct course?

  1. Accept the brief and disclose the lack of competence to the court at the hearing
  2. Decline the brief or accept it only if able to become competent without risk to the client, because competence is a professional obligation Correct answer.
  3. Accept the brief because the fee is high and the advocate can learn on the job
  4. Accept the brief and rely on the instructing solicitor to supervise the work

Explanation

Competence is a core professional obligation, and an advocate must not accept instructions in a matter they cannot handle competently. The advocate should decline or take steps to acquire competence without risk to the client.

Question 26Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is instructed to act for a client in a matter where the advocate's spouse is a director of the opposing party. What is the advocate's primary obligation regarding this conflict of interest?

  1. The advocate must disclose the conflict to the court but may continue acting.
  2. The advocate may continue if the spouse agrees not to discuss the matter at home.
  3. The advocate may proceed if the advocate believes the conflict will not affect their professional judgment.
  4. The advocate must decline the instruction unless the client gives informed consent to the conflict. Correct answer.

Explanation

An advocate must avoid conflicts of interest that could impair their independence or loyalty to the client. A close family member's directorship in the opposing party is a significant conflict that ordinarily requires the advocate to decline the instruction unless the client, fully informed, consents and it is reasonable to act.

Question 27Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is instructed in a case and, during preparation, discovers a document that is protected by legal professional privilege belonging to the opposing party. The document was mistakenly included in a bundle disclosed by the opposing solicitor. What is the advocate's proper course of action?

  1. Retain the document but do not disclose it to the client.
  2. Use the document in cross-examination because it is now in the advocate's possession.
  3. Return the document to the opposing solicitor without reading it further and without using it. Correct answer.
  4. Disclose the document to the court and seek directions on its use.

Explanation

An advocate who receives material that is obviously privileged and was disclosed in error must not read or use it. The proper course is to return it promptly to the sender without taking advantage of the mistake, thereby upholding the integrity of the administration of justice.

Question 28Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is instructed by a client to make a statement to the court that the advocate knows is false. The client insists that the statement is true. What is the advocate's ethical obligation?

  1. The advocate must follow the client's instruction because the client is the ultimate decision-maker.
  2. The advocate must make the statement but inform the court privately afterwards.
  3. The advocate must withdraw from the case immediately without explaining the reason to the court.
  4. The advocate must refuse to make the false statement and must correct any false impression already created. Correct answer.

Explanation

An advocate has a duty not to mislead the court and must not knowingly present false evidence or make false submissions. If a client insists on a false statement, the advocate must refuse and, if necessary, take steps to correct any misleading impression, while maintaining confidentiality as far as possible.

Question 29Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is asked by a solicitor to accept a brief on the condition that the advocate will not seek an adjournment under any circumstances. The advocate believes an adjournment may be necessary to properly prepare the client's case. What is the advocate's proper response?

  1. Decline the brief if the condition would prevent the advocate from providing competent representation. Correct answer.
  2. Accept the brief and later apply for an adjournment without informing the solicitor.
  3. Accept the brief but ignore the condition if an adjournment becomes necessary.
  4. Accept the brief and inform the court of the condition at the first hearing.

Explanation

An advocate must exercise independent judgment and must not accept instructions that improperly restrict their ability to act competently and in the client's best interests. A condition that prevents the advocate from seeking a necessary adjournment may compromise competent representation, so the advocate should decline the brief or seek to have the condition removed.

Question 30Professional ethics, conduct and regulatory obligations

An advocate is instructed in a matter and, during the proceedings, the advocate's client informs the advocate that the client intends to destroy documents that are relevant to the case and subject to disclosure. What is the advocate's most appropriate course of action?

  1. Inform the opposing party directly without the client's consent.
  2. Advise the client that destroying documents is unlawful and may constitute contempt, and withdraw if the client persists. Correct answer.
  3. Take no action because the client's conduct is a personal matter outside the advocate's responsibility.
  4. Continue acting but make a note on the file for future reference.

Explanation

An advocate must not assist or encourage a client to act unlawfully or to destroy evidence. The advocate should advise the client against such conduct and, if the client persists, may need to withdraw from the case to avoid being complicit in a deception of the court.

Question 31Case analysis, legal research and advice

In case analysis, what is the primary purpose of identifying the ratio decidendi of a judgment?

  1. To list every authority cited by counsel during oral argument
  2. To isolate the legal principle on which the decision rests so it can be applied to later cases Correct answer.
  3. To summarise the procedural history of the litigation for the case file
  4. To record the personal opinions expressed by a judge that carry no binding weight

Explanation

The ratio decidendi is the legal rule or principle that is necessary to the court's decision and therefore carries precedential weight. Obiter dicta and procedural narration do not bind later courts, so distinguishing the ratio is the central task of case analysis.

Question 32Case analysis, legal research and advice

A junior advocate is asked to produce a case note. Which element most clearly distinguishes a case note from a bare headnote summary?

  1. It reproduces the judgment verbatim in full
  2. It evaluates the reasoning and its implications for future litigation Correct answer.
  3. It lists the names of the parties and the court only
  4. It records the date of the hearing and the judgment

Explanation

A case note is an analytical commentary: it explains the facts, the reasoning and, crucially, assesses the significance of the decision and its consequences. A headnote summarises holdings, whereas a case note adds critical evaluation and forward-looking implications.

Question 33Case analysis, legal research and advice

When reading a first-instance judgment for a client advice, an advocate encounters a passage where the judge says 'it would seem to follow that...' before deciding the point on a different ground. How should this passage best be treated?

  1. As a finding of fact that cannot be appealed
  2. As obiter dicta of persuasive value only Correct answer.
  3. As a procedural direction binding on the parties
  4. As binding ratio because it appears in the judgment

Explanation

Reasoning that is not necessary to the actual ground of decision is obiter dicta and is persuasive rather than binding. The advocate should note it as indicative of judicial thinking but cannot present it to the client as a rule the court was obliged to reach.

Question 34Case analysis, legal research and advice

An advocate is distinguishing a prior appellate decision that is otherwise binding. Which technique is most orthodox?

  1. Showing that a material fact in the present case falls outside the principle established Correct answer.
  2. Persuading the court to ignore the precedent without explanation
  3. Relying on a later first-instance decision that conflicts with it
  4. Arguing that the earlier court was simply wrong on the law

Explanation

Distinguishing operates by demonstrating that the material facts of the instant case fall outside the scope of the ratio of the earlier decision, so the precedent does not govern. Arguing that a higher court was wrong is not open to a lower court bound by it.

Question 35Case analysis, legal research and advice

Which source should an advocate consult first to confirm whether a statutory provision has been amended since enactment?

  1. The explanatory memorandum issued when the Act was passed
  2. The current consolidated version of the legislation with annotations Correct answer.
  3. A newspaper report about the original bill
  4. A textbook commentary on the area of law

Explanation

The consolidated or annotated version of the statute records amendments and their commencement, so it is the reliable starting point for the provision as currently in force. Secondary materials may be out of date and cannot establish the current text.

Question 36Case analysis, legal research and advice

In legal research, what is the key characteristic of a 'secondary source' such as a journal article?

  1. It is binding on courts within the relevant jurisdiction
  2. It explains, critiques or synthesises primary law without itself creating it Correct answer.
  3. It has the same status as a reported judgment
  4. It overrides inconsistent statutory provisions

Explanation

Secondary sources interpret and comment on primary law - statutes, regulations and cases - but do not themselves lay down binding rules. They are valuable for locating and understanding authority, which the advocate must then verify in the primary sources.

Question 37Case analysis, legal research and advice

A client asks whether a recent Supreme Court decision changes the advice already given. The decision reverses the Court of Appeal authority on which the advice rested. What is the correct professional response?

  1. Notify the client promptly and revise the advice in light of the new authority Correct answer.
  2. Apply the old authority because the facts predate the new decision
  3. Maintain the original advice because it was correct when given
  4. Wait until the client raises the issue at the next hearing

Explanation

Advice must reflect the law as it stands, and a reversal by a higher court removes the foundation of the earlier opinion. The advocate should inform the client without delay and provide revised advice, since continuing to rely on overruled authority would mislead the client.

Question 38Case analysis, legal research and advice

Which technique best supports a reliable conclusion when researching an unfamiliar area of law under time pressure?

  1. Drafting the advice first and finding authority afterwards
  2. Starting from an authoritative textbook or practitioner text to identify the governing statute and leading cases Correct answer.
  3. Asking an opposing advocate what the law provides
  4. Relying solely on the first search result returned by a database

Explanation

A structured approach begins with a recognised secondary text to map the governing legislation and leading authorities, which are then verified in primary sources. This avoids the fragmentation and unreliability of unstructured searching.

Question 39Case analysis, legal research and advice

An advocate relies on a judgment that has since been overruled but which remains printed in an old report series. What is this an example of, and what control should be applied?

  1. Obiter dicta; the passage should be cited as persuasive
  2. Persuasive foreign authority; it may be cited without verification
  3. Good law; no control is needed because it is reported
  4. Bad law; a citator or subsequent-history check should be run before reliance Correct answer.

Explanation

A case that has been overruled is no longer good law even if it remains in print, so a citator or subsequent-history check is essential before citing it. Failing to check the subsequent treatment of authority is a classic source of professional embarrassment.

Question 40Case analysis, legal research and advice

When constructing a legal argument from a line of cases, which approach best demonstrates analytical rigour?

  1. Relying on a single case that favours the client's position
  2. Synthesising the principles from the leading cases and showing how they apply to the client's facts Correct answer.
  3. Citing as many cases as possible to show breadth of reading
  4. Quoting lengthy extracts from each judgment without comment

Explanation

Rigour lies in extracting the governing principles from the authorities and reasoning from them to the client's facts. Volume of citation or lengthy quotation without analysis obscures rather than advances the argument.

Question 41Case analysis, legal research and advice

An advocate must advise on the meaning of an ambiguous statutory phrase. Which material is generally admissible as an aid to construction in a common law jurisdiction?

  1. A later minister's opinion on how the provision should be read
  2. A textbook author's preferred interpretation of the phrase
  3. A statement by the minister during the parliamentary passage of the Bill, where the ambiguity is real Correct answer.
  4. A private letter from the drafter explaining what was intended

Explanation

In many common law jurisdictions, ministerial statements made during the passage of legislation may be used as an aid to construction where the provision is genuinely ambiguous, obscure or leads to absurdity. Private intentions of the drafter and later opinions are not admissible for that purpose.

Question 42Case analysis, legal research and advice

A precedent from a court of coordinate jurisdiction conflicts with a precedent from a higher court. Which should an advocate treat as governing?

  1. Whichever decision favours the client's case
  2. The coordinate decision, because it is more recent
  3. The higher court decision, because it is binding within the hierarchy Correct answer.
  4. Neither, because the conflict destroys both authorities

Explanation

The doctrine of precedent is hierarchical: a decision of a higher court binds courts below it, whereas a coordinate decision is at most highly persuasive. A conflict between them is resolved in favour of the higher court's ruling.

Question 43Case analysis, legal research and advice

In preparing written advice to a client, which structure best reflects the IRAC method?

  1. Issue, the relevant rule, application of the rule to the facts, and the conclusion Correct answer.
  2. Rule, then the client's instructions, then the conclusion, then the issue
  3. Facts, then the conclusion, then the rule, then counterarguments
  4. Conclusion, then facts, then a list of authorities, then issues

Explanation

IRAC proceeds by identifying the issue, stating the governing rule, applying that rule to the material facts and then reaching a conclusion. This order makes the reasoning transparent and allows the client to see how the conclusion follows from the law and facts.

Question 44Case analysis, legal research and advice

An advocate is assessing whether a first-instance decision carries persuasive weight in a later case in another court of equal rank. Which factor is most relevant?

  1. The date on which the judgment was handed down alone
  2. The quality of the reasoning and the standing of the judge Correct answer.
  3. The number of authorities cited in the judgment
  4. The length of the judgment

Explanation

Persuasive weight turns principally on the cogency of the reasoning and the authority of the judge, not on formal attributes such as length or citation count. A well-reasoned decision may persuade even where it does not bind.

Question 45Case analysis, legal research and advice

A statute uses the phrase 'may, if the court thinks fit'. How should an advocate characterise the court's power?

  1. A mandatory duty that the court must exercise in every case
  2. A rule of evidence governing admissibility
  3. A prohibition on the court acting
  4. A discretionary power that the court may exercise or decline Correct answer.

Explanation

The word 'may' ordinarily confers a discretion, and the qualifying phrase 'if the court thinks fit' confirms that the court decides whether to exercise the power. It does not impose a duty to act in every case.

Question 46Case analysis, legal research and advice

During case analysis an advocate identifies a passage in which the judge comments on a policy question not raised by the parties. What is the correct characterisation?

  1. Obiter, because it was not necessary to the decision Correct answer.
  2. A binding direction to the parties
  3. Ratio, because the judge discussed it at length
  4. A finding that the statute is invalid

Explanation

Remarks on matters not necessary to the resolution of the dispute, including general policy observations, are obiter dicta. Their length or prominence does not convert them into ratio.

Question 47Case analysis, legal research and advice

An advocate is asked to advise whether a proposed claim is viable. Which step should come first in a structured case analysis?

  1. Selecting the court in which to file
  2. Negotiating a settlement figure with the opponent
  3. Drafting the statement of claim in full
  4. Identifying the material facts and the legal issues they raise Correct answer.

Explanation

Structured case analysis begins with the material facts and the legal issues to which they give rise, since these determine the applicable rules and the remedy sought. Drafting, forum selection and settlement all depend on that preliminary analysis.

Question 48Case analysis, legal research and advice

Which practice best ensures that a research trail can be verified by a supervising advocate?

  1. Deleting unsuccessful searches from the record
  2. Recording each source consulted, the search terms used and the date of the search Correct answer.
  3. Citing only the final authority relied upon
  4. Relying on memory of the sources consulted

Explanation

A verifiable research trail records what was searched, where and when, so that another lawyer can check the currency and completeness of the research. Omitting unsuccessful searches or relying on memory defeats that purpose.

Question 49Case analysis, legal research and advice

A client's matter turns on the meaning of a term defined in the interpretation section of an Act. Where should the advocate look first?

  1. The definition section of the Act itself Correct answer.
  2. The marginal notes of the printed statute
  3. A dictionary of ordinary English usage
  4. The long title of the Act

Explanation

Where a term is defined in the legislation, the statutory definition governs its meaning and must be consulted before any consideration of ordinary usage. Resorting to a dictionary is appropriate only where no statutory definition applies.

Question 50Case analysis, legal research and advice

An advocate finds that the leading case on point was decided by a court that has since been abolished and its jurisdiction transferred. What is the status of that decision?

  1. It remains authority, subject to the hierarchy of the court that now exercises the jurisdiction Correct answer.
  2. It binds all courts in the jurisdiction
  3. It is automatically void and cannot be cited
  4. It becomes obiter dicta because the court no longer exists

Explanation

Abolition of a court does not extinguish its decisions; they continue to be cited, with their weight determined by the position in the hierarchy of the court that now exercises the relevant jurisdiction. The advocate must therefore check how the successor court ranks.