EIPA study materials
EIPA study resources

EIPA study plan

EIPA · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Management of public funding (ESIF, recovery & reform, public procurement, state aid)

  • Map the 2021-2027 MFF and the ESIF regulations (Common Provisions Regulation, ERDF, ESF+, JTF, CAP strategic plans) onto the obligations they place on managing authorities and beneficiaries.

  • Distinguish Recovery and Resilience Facility grant and loan mechanics, milestone/target-based disbursement and verification duties from cohesion-policy reimbursement logic.

  • Sequence the stages of an EU public procurement procedure above and below the thresholds, and identify the review and remedies routes available to unsuccessful bidders.

  • Classify a state aid measure against the GBER, the de minimis rules and the notification/standstill obligation, and justify the classification.

  • Derive the audit and control obligations that follow from shared management versus direct management of EU funds.

Your checkpoint

A one-page decision tree for choosing between an ESIF, an RRF and a state-aid-compliant national funding route, plus 30 self-written question-and-answer cards answered closed-book at 80% recall or better.

Week 2

Management of public funding (ESIF, recovery & reform, public procurement, state aid) & EU governance and policy-making (better regulation, EU decision-making, negotiations, EU presidency)

  • Apply procurement thresholds, award criteria and conflict-of-interest rules to three constructed case scenarios and defend the chosen procedure in writing.

  • Trace the ordinary legislative procedure through Commission proposal, Council working party, European Parliament committee and trilogue, naming each actor's veto point.

  • Explain how the presidency sets the Council agenda, builds qualified-majority coalitions and drafts compromise texts.

  • Differentiate delegated and implementing acts, and state who controls each under the Treaty articles and the comitology rules.

Your checkpoint

A 1,500-word timed written answer on a combined procurement-plus-Council-negotiation scenario, self-marked against a checklist of ten required points and re-drafted once.

Week 3

EU governance and policy-making (better regulation, EU decision-making, negotiations, EU presidency)

  • Compare the ordinary legislative procedure with the special procedures and with the consultation and consent routes, citing the relevant Treaty bases.

  • Summarise the better-regulation toolkit: impact assessment, stakeholder consultation, fitness checks, the one-in-one-out approach and REFIT evaluation.

  • Analyse publicly available Council press releases and general approaches to identify the drafting techniques used to bridge Member State positions.

  • Outline the negotiation stages of an accession or trade mandate from Council negotiating directives to signature and ratification.

Your checkpoint

A full legislative-cycle flowchart with every veto point and decision rule annotated, explained aloud in a ten-minute recorded self-briefing.

Week 4

Effective public administration (knowledge management, quality management/CAF)

  • Score an organisation against the nine CAF 2020 criteria, separating enablers from results and recording evidence for each score.

  • Design a knowledge-management routine covering lessons learned, communities of practice, handover documentation and exit interviews.

  • Select and justify quality tools (PDCA, stakeholder mapping, benchmarking, process mapping) for given administrative problems.

  • Convert self-assessment findings into SMART improvement actions with owners, timelines and indicators.

  • Explain how quality-management cycles link to performance budgeting and to EU funds' enabling conditions.

Your checkpoint

A completed mini-CAF self-assessment for a fictional public body - nine criteria scored with evidence notes - plus five prioritised improvement actions with indicators.

Week 5

Global EU

  • Map the EU's external financing instruments (NDICI-Global Europe, IPA III, humanitarian aid) onto their legal bases and decision rules.

  • Explain CFSP and CSDP decision-making: unanimity, the High Representative, the Political and Security Committee and the EEAS role.

  • Distinguish exclusive, shared and supporting competences, citing one Treaty article for each category.

  • Assess enlargement and neighbourhood policy conditionality, including the rule-of-law and democratic-backsliding triggers.

  • Outline the EU's sanctions, trade defence and development-policy instruments and where the Council and Parliament must agree.

Your checkpoint

A one-page matrix of external financing instruments against legal base, decision rule and scrutiny actor, plus 25 closed-book flashcards on CFSP and CSDP answered at 80% or better.

Week 6

EU law and policies (digital policy, cyber security and data protection, EU administrative law, Green Deal, freedom, security and justice, general EU law)

  • Summarise GDPR principles, lawful bases, DPIA triggers, DPO duties and the one-stop-shop cooperation and consistency mechanism.

  • Outline NIS2 and the Cyber Resilience Act obligations that fall on public-sector entities, including supply-chain and incident-reporting duties.

  • Apply EU administrative-law principles - proportionality, legitimate expectations, duty to give reasons and access to documents - to constructed decisions.

  • Summarise the digital-policy package (DSA, DMA, Data Governance Act, Data Act) and the Green Deal's main legislative instruments.

  • Explain the core AFSJ instruments: Schengen, the Dublin succession rules, Europol and Eurojust mandates, and mutual recognition in criminal matters.

Your checkpoint

A 40-question self-written mixed-law quiz covering GDPR, NIS2, administrative-law principles, Green Deal and AFSJ, completed closed-book at 75% or better.

Week 7

Artificial Intelligence

  • Classify AI systems across the AI Act risk tiers and list the obligations of providers, deployers and importers at each tier.

  • Explain general-purpose AI model obligations, including transparency, documentation, copyright policy and systemic-risk duties.

  • Map GDPR–AI Act interactions: DPIA, automated decision-making, data minimisation in training data and the right to explanation.

  • Describe AI governance and enforcement bodies - the AI Office, AI Board, notified bodies and market surveillance authorities.

  • Evaluate accountability questions when a public body procures or deploys an AI system, including documentation and human oversight.

Your checkpoint

A risk-tier classification table applied to twelve concrete AI use cases, each row naming the applicable obligations, the governance actor and the GDPR touchpoint.

Week 8

Management of public funding (ESIF, recovery & reform, public procurement, state aid) & EU governance and policy-making (better regulation, EU decision-making, negotiations, EU presidency) & Effective public administration (knowledge management, quality management/CAF) & Global EU & EU law and policies (digital policy, cyber security and data protection, EU administrative law, Green Deal, freedom, security and justice, general EU law) & Artificial Intelligence

  • Re-drill every subtopic logged as a miss in earlier weeks until closed-book accuracy reaches 85%.

  • Complete two full-length timed mock exams under exam conditions and score them cold.

  • Practise cross-domain scenarios, such as an AI procurement funded by the RRF or a cyber-incident response touching GDPR and NIS2.

  • Consolidate one summary sheet per domain with the ten facts most likely to be tested.

Your checkpoint

Two scored full mock exams with a final error log showing no domain below 70% and an overall average of 75% or higher.

Milestones

Week 2: Can explain, without notes, the difference between ESIF shared management and RRF performance-based disbursement, and name the procurement thresholds and the state aid notification route - verified by a five-minute unscripted explanation.

Week 4: Closed-book mock of 30 mixed questions drawn from Domains 1-3, scored at 70% or better, with every miss tagged to a subtopic in the error log.

Week 6: All six domains have at least one completed pass, and the error log shows no domain with more than three unresolved misses.

Week 7: AI Act risk-tier table completed for all twelve use cases with no unverified entry, and AI Act questions answered at 75% or better closed-book.

Week 8: Both full mock exams scored, average 75% or higher and no single domain below 70%, with the error log fully resolved or explicitly parked with a null fact flagged for review.