Estate Recovery Against a Revocable Trust and the Caregiver Child Claim
Walter, 76, died in a nursing home after three years of Medicaid coverage. His home, worth $320,000, was titled in a revocable living trust created in 2018; the trust named his daughter, Susan, as successor trustee and beneficiary, with remainder to his two grandchildren. Susan moved into the home in 2021 and cared for Walter for 26 months before he entered the nursing home, paying $14,000 of her own money for repairs. The state Medicaid agency sent a claim for $187,000. Walter's probate estate contains only a $12,000 checking account; the trust holds the home and a $45,000 brokerage account. The trust became irrevocable at Walter's death. Susan asks whether the state can reach the trust assets and whether the caregiver child exception applies.
1. Can the state recover from the revocable trust? Explain how state estate recovery law treats probate versus non-probate assets.
Read the worked answer
Federal Medicaid law requires recovery from the recipient's probate estate, but states may expand recovery to non-probate assets, including revocable trusts, joint accounts, life estates, and transfer-on-death property. Because Walter retained the power to revoke and enjoyed the trust assets, the home and brokerage account are likely reachable if the state's statute or Medicaid plan includes revocable trusts.
The $12,000 checking account is clearly a probate asset, but it will not satisfy the $187,000 claim. Counsel must read the trust, the state recovery statute, and the claim notice. Check the statute of limitations and whether the state followed required notice. Susan should not distribute the trust assets. If the trust is reachable, the state may claim the home and account, subject to the caregiver exception and hardship waiver. If the state did not expand recovery, the trust assets may pass outside the claim; that is a statutory question, not a generic rule.
2. Evaluate Susan's caregiver child exception claim. What facts must she prove, and what evidence should counsel gather?
Read the worked answer
The caregiver child exception typically requires an adult child to prove that she lived in the parent's home for at least two years immediately before the parent's institutionalization and that her care delayed the institutionalization. Susan's 26 months of residence and care fit the timeline, but she must document continuous residence and the care that delayed placement.
Evidence includes a driver's license, voter registration, tax returns, utility bills, mail, care logs, physician statements, receipts, and witness statements from neighbors and providers. The $14,000 she paid for repairs may support her care claim and may also be a reimbursable expense, but it does not by itself establish the exception. The trust's ownership of the home complicates the claim because the exception is usually framed around the parent's home; counsel should show Walter retained beneficial ownership and the trust was merely his estate-planning vehicle. File the exception before the appeal deadline.
3. What planning could have avoided or reduced the recovery, and what should Susan do now?
Read the worked answer
Better planning might have used an irrevocable trust, a caregiver agreement, or a transfer of the home to Susan with a retained life estate, but each has five-year look-back and penalty consequences. A caregiver child transfer can be penalty-free if the child lived in the home and provided care for two years, but that transfer should have been completed and documented before Walter entered the nursing home.
Now Susan should request a written breakdown of the claim, confirm what assets are subject to recovery, apply for the caregiver exception and a hardship waiver, and preserve appeal rights. She should not pay the claim from trust funds before determining whether the trust is reachable. If the home must be sold, counsel should negotiate the amount and protect Susan's reimbursement claim. Probate administration should not close until the recovery claim is resolved.