EPSO AD5 study plan
EPSO AD5 · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
EU knowledge and drafting (written case study on an EU policy or administrative topic) & Verbal reasoning (understanding and analysing written EU-related texts)
Outline three EU policy documents in 150 words each, isolating problem, legal base, options, impact and recommendation
Draft one 900-word policy briefing on a current EU administrative topic with an explicit problem statement, options appraisal and single recommendation
Complete 30 verbal-reasoning items on EU-related passages and log every wrong answer with the inference or scope rule missed
Summarise five EU press releases into one sentence each to practise extracting the author's central claim
Your checkpoint
One 900-word policy brief self-scored against a 10-point rubric (target 6/10 or better) plus an error log of 30 verbal items classified by error type
EU knowledge and drafting (written case study on an EU policy or administrative topic) & Numerical reasoning (data interpretation and quantitative problem solving)
Restructure the week-1 brief into a strict case-study skeleton: situation analysis, options appraisal, recommendation, implementation risks
Solve 40 data-interpretation questions covering percentages, ratios and index numbers in two 25-minute timed blocks
Convert three EU statistical tables into three-sentence findings with correct units and rounding
Write a 200-word executive summary of the case study using quantified claims only
Your checkpoint
Timed numerical set scored at 75% or better within 25 minutes, plus a revised 1,000-word case study with executive summary
EU knowledge and drafting (written case study on an EU policy or administrative topic) & Competency-based assessment (analysis and problem solving, communication, teamwork, resilience, leadership)
Produce a full case study under 90-minute exam conditions and mark it against a written 12-point rubric
Draft six STAR outlines for analysis-and-problem-solving and communication questions drawn from your own experience
Rewrite two STAR outlines to strip preamble and lead with the action and the measurable result
Record two spoken answers and time them against a 3-minute limit
Your checkpoint
One timed case study scored at 60% or better on the rubric plus six STAR outlines of 120 words or fewer
Competency-based assessment (analysis and problem solving, communication, teamwork, resilience, leadership) & Numerical reasoning (data interpretation and quantitative problem solving)
Expand the competency bank to 12 STAR stories covering all six competencies, each anchored to a numeric result
Run a 45-minute mock interview of eight questions and score each answer against written anchor descriptors
Solve 60 numerical items spanning percentage change, weighted averages and growth rates, tracking accuracy by item type
Cut average numerical item time to 75 seconds or less while holding accuracy at 80% or better
Your checkpoint
A 12-story competency bank, mock-interview self-scores, and a numerical log showing 80%+ accuracy at 75 seconds per item or faster
Verbal reasoning (understanding and analysing written EU-related texts) & Abstract reasoning (pattern recognition and logical sequencing)
Complete 60 verbal items across three 20-minute timed blocks and record the score for each block
Analyse ten EU legislative texts to state the main argument, the supporting evidence and one unstated assumption
Work 50 abstract-reasoning items on rotation, mirroring and series, writing the governing rule for each solved item
Compile a one-page rule sheet of recurring abstract patterns and test it against ten unseen items
Your checkpoint
Verbal score of 70% or better across the three timed blocks plus a one-page abstract-pattern rule sheet validated on 50 items
Numerical reasoning (data interpretation and quantitative problem solving) & Abstract reasoning (pattern recognition and logical sequencing)
Sit two full 20-question numerical sets at exam pace and review every error from both a method and a reading angle
Solve 40 abstract items under 60 seconds each and rank the three pattern types consuming the most time
Drill 30 mixed numerical items combining tables, charts and prose to practise selecting the right data source
Draft a one-page numerical checklist covering units, base year, percentage points versus percent and rounding
Your checkpoint
Both numerical sets at 80% or better and abstract accuracy at 75% or better, supported by a written error analysis
Situational judgement (behavioural judgement in EU institutional contexts) & Competency-based assessment (analysis and problem solving, communication, teamwork, resilience, leadership)
Work 40 situational-judgement scenarios and write the justifying principle behind each chosen response, aligned to EU institutional values
Map integrity, transparency and service to the public onto six prepared behavioural examples
Stress-test the resilience and leadership stories against adversarial follow-up questions from a reviewer
Condense the judgement principles into a one-page decision heuristic and re-test it on ten new scenarios
Your checkpoint
A one-page situational-judgement decision heuristic backed by 40 logged scenarios, plus a revised competency bank with stress-tested resilience and leadership stories
Verbal reasoning (understanding and analysing written EU-related texts) & Numerical reasoning (data interpretation and quantitative problem solving) & Abstract reasoning (pattern recognition and logical sequencing) & Situational judgement (behavioural judgement in EU institutional contexts) & EU knowledge and drafting (written case study on an EU policy or administrative topic) & Competency-based assessment (analysis and problem solving, communication, teamwork, resilience, leadership)
Sit two full-length mock exams reproducing the real section mix and time limits
Consolidate all error logs into a two-page revision sheet listing the 20 most frequent mistakes
Re-drill the two weakest domains with 30 targeted items each
Finalise the case-study template and rehearse a 15-minute outline-to-answer drill under exam pressure
Your checkpoint
Two full mock-exam score reports, a two-page consolidated revision sheet and a finalised one-page case-study template
Milestones
Week 2: Complete a 20-question numerical set at 75% or better in 25 minutes and show a case study containing a scored options appraisal and a quantified recommendation
Week 4: Hold a 12-story competency bank covering all six competencies and sustain 80%+ numerical accuracy at 75 seconds per item or faster
Week 6: Score 80%+ on a full numerical set and 75%+ on abstract reasoning, with a written analysis naming the top three recurring error causes
Week 8: Complete two full mock exams at or above target thresholds in every section, with a two-page revision sheet and a reusable case-study template in hand