Summary Scoring: Bike Lanes vs Secure Parking
An English department is moderating a 10-item reading test. The text is a 340-word article arguing that the main barrier to cycling in mid-sized Spanish cities is not bike lanes but the lack of secure parking at home and work. It opens: 'City halls keep counting kilometres of bike lane, but the numbers that matter are elsewhere.' It closes: 'Until a rider can leave a €600 bike outside a flat without fear, painted lanes will remain a photo opportunity.' The task asks for the main idea in one sentence (maximum 25 words). A student writes: 'The article says that bike lanes are a photo opportunity and that city halls only count kilometres, so cycling policies are mostly advertising.' That is 24 words. The mark scheme reads: 'The main barrier to cycling is secure parking, not bike lanes.' The student's answer quotes the closing metaphor and mentions counting, but never names parking. The item is scored 0–2: 2 = main idea accurately stated; 1 = partial or mostly detail; 0 = wrong or irrelevant. The teacher must decide between 1 and 2.
1. Should the answer receive 1 or 2? Justify the decision using the text's opening and closing and the wording of the task.
Read the worked answer
The answer should receive 1, not 2. The item asks for the main idea, which the key defines as the parking barrier. The student's sentence captures the article's critical tone and two images, but it never states the causal claim: secure parking, not bike lanes, is what determines whether people cycle. 'Photo opportunity' is the author's closing metaphor, and 'counting kilometres' is an example of what city halls do; neither is the thesis. The opening's contrast ('numbers that matter are elsewhere') points forward to the parking claim, so the student has noticed the signal but not followed it. A score of 2 needs the central claim in the student's own words; a score of 1 is right for a partial grasp that leans on detail. Feedback should ask the student to complete: 'The article argues that the real obstacle is ...' rather than simply quoting more.
2. Rewrite the student's sentence so that it would earn 2/2, keeping the critical tone but naming the central claim in no more than 25 words.
Read the worked answer
Model: 'Although city halls promote bike lanes, the article argues that the real obstacle to cycling is the lack of secure parking at home and work.' This is 25 words, so it is exactly at the limit. It earns 2/2 because it (a) keeps the concessive frame that reflects the article's opening, (b) names the thesis (secure parking), and (c) drops the metaphor and the counting detail, which are supporting rhetoric. The count matters: Although(1) city(2) halls(3) promote(4) bike(5) lanes(6) the(7) article(8) argues(9) that(10) the(11) real(12) obstacle(13) to(14) cycling(15) is(16) the(17) lack(18) of(19) secure(20) parking(21) at(22) home(23) and(24) work(25). The rewrite also avoids copying the key verbatim, which is useful if the task says 'in your own words'.