EPYA study materials
EPYA study resources

Recertification Shortfall, an Unapproved Ethics Webinar, and a Missed Update

EPYA · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Recertification Shortfall, an Unapproved Ethics Webinar, and a Missed Update

Nadia holds an EPYA certification with a three-year recertification cycle ending December 31. She needs 60 continuing education credits, including 20 ethics credits, and the recertification fee. As of December 1, she has 45 credits: 35 from EPYA-approved courses and 10 from an unapproved vendor’s webinar labeled “ethics.” She moved in June and did not update her email address, so she missed the November audit notice and a program update stating, “Effective next cycle, the ethics minimum rises to 25; the current cycle remains 20.” Her application is due December 31. EPYA policy states: only credits from approved providers count; late applications receive a 60-day grace period with a late fee if submitted before March 1; after that, certification lapses and the candidate must apply for reinstatement; appeals based on extenuating circumstances must be filed within 30 days of lapse with documentation; certificants must maintain current contact information.

1. Can Nadia count the unapproved ethics webinar? Calculate her position and identify the fastest compliant path.

Read the worked answer

No - the unapproved webinar cannot count. The policy limits credit to approved providers, and the “ethics” label does not change that. Even if it could count, Nadia would have 45 of 60 credits and only 10 of 20 ethics credits. She is short 15 total credits, including 10 ethics credits.

The fastest compliant path is to earn 10 approved ethics credits and 5 additional approved general credits before December 31, using EPYA-approved on-demand or live courses. She should verify each provider’s approval before enrolling, keep completion certificates, and submit the application with the fee by the deadline. Thirty days is tight but possible if she acts immediately. If she cannot complete the credits in time, she can use the 60-day grace period, but she still needs the missing approved credits and must pay the late fee before March 1. She should not submit the unapproved webinar and hope it passes an audit; that would create a documentation problem and could delay or jeopardize recertification.

2. If Nadia misses the grace period, what happens, and which appeal arguments are strong or weak?

Read the worked answer

After March 1, the certification lapses. Nadia must stop presenting herself as holding the EPYA credential and must apply for reinstatement under the program’s rules; she cannot simply backdate credits or continue using the title. An appeal based on extenuating circumstances must be filed within 30 days of the lapse with documentation.

Strong appeal facts would be a documented medical emergency, serious illness, death in the immediate family, or a disaster that prevented her from completing and submitting the application despite reasonable efforts. Weak facts are that she moved and did not update her email, that she was busy at work, or that she did not know about the ethics change. The current cycle remained at 20 ethics credits, and the update applied to the next cycle. Certificants are responsible for maintaining current contact information, and the audit notice went to her last known email. Her failure to update contact is therefore unlikely to excuse the lapse. She should update her contact information immediately and request reinstatement instructions.

3. What should EPYA’s communication have done, and what should Nadia check now regarding the ethics change?

Read the worked answer

EPYA should have communicated the ethics change through multiple channels: the certification portal, the last known email, and the current handbook, with clear language that the 25-credit ethics minimum applies next cycle, not the current one. It should also remind certificants to keep contact information current. That said, the program cannot guarantee receipt when a certificant has not updated her email.

Nadia should now log into the official EPYA portal, verify her transcript and approved credits, confirm the current-cycle ethics requirement, update her email and address, and read the current recertification handbook. She should not rely on social media or an old PDF. If the portal shows the 20-credit ethics minimum for the current cycle, she still needs 10 approved ethics credits and 15 total credits. If she believes a credit is missing, she should file a credit-review request with certificates before the deadline rather than assume the portal is wrong.