CESGA study plan
CESGA · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
ESG in the investment process and financial analysis
Map the ESG integration spectrum (negative screening, best-in-class, thematic, full integration) to concrete portfolio construction decisions and explain the trade-offs of each approach
Calculate the effect of an exclusion screen on a benchmark's sector weights, tracking error, and active share using a hypothetical 50-stock universe
Distinguish materiality from financial materiality and apply the SASB-style materiality lens to at least three sectors
Build a one-page ESG integration memo for a fictional equity fund that states the objective, constraints, data sources, and escalation path for breaches
Your checkpoint
A 2-page ESG integration memo plus a spreadsheet showing pre- and post-screen sector weights and estimated tracking error for one hypothetical portfolio
ESG in the investment process and financial analysis
Decompose an issuer's ESG score into its underlying pillars and identify which inputs drive the final rating, then critique the methodology's subjective choices
Compute a carbon intensity metric (tCO2e per EUR million revenue) for a five-company portfolio and compare it with a weighted average carbon intensity benchmark
Explain how ESG factors enter a discounted cash flow model through revenue growth, margins, capex, and cost of capital, and quantify one sensitivity
Interpret the main findings of the major ESG-return meta-studies (e.g., direction of correlation between ESG and financial performance, and the role of materiality) without overstating causality
Your checkpoint
A valuation worksheet that adjusts one company's DCF for a carbon price and shows the resulting change in enterprise value, with a short written rationale
Environmental factors and climate risk
Classify physical and transition risks using the TCFD risk taxonomy and give two sector-specific examples of each
Distinguish Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions and explain why Scope 3 dominates for many sectors and why data quality is weaker there
Translate a 1.5°C and a 2°C scenario into different carbon price paths and describe how each affects a high-emitting company's cash flows
Identify the main climate data providers and rating agencies and compare their coverage and methodological differences at a high level
Your checkpoint
A climate risk register for one sector listing at least eight risks (physical and transition), each with a likelihood, impact, and suggested portfolio response
Environmental factors and climate risk & Social factors and governance factors
Explain the physical risk transmission channels (chronic and acute) for real assets, supply chains, and sovereign exposure
Apply the concept of stranded assets to a fossil-fuel-heavy portfolio and estimate exposure using reserves and carbon budgets
Describe the main social factors (labour standards, health and safety, human rights, community relations, product safety) and give one material example per factor
Explain governance mechanisms (board independence, dual-class shares, say-on-pay, audit quality) and how each can affect shareholder value
Your checkpoint
A combined climate-and-social risk heat map for a 10-holding portfolio, with each holding scored on physical risk, transition risk, and social risk
Social factors and governance factors
Analyse a real proxy contest or say-on-pay vote and explain the governance failures and investor responses involved
Distinguish controversy-based exclusions from norms-based screening and describe when each is appropriate
Evaluate how board diversity and independence metrics differ across markets and what that means for engagement priorities
Assess the link between tax transparency, corruption risk, and long-term shareholder value using at least two sector examples
Your checkpoint
A governance case note on one company (max 2 pages) covering ownership structure, board composition, remuneration, and one engagement recommendation
ESG regulation, reporting standards (ESRS, ISSB) and stewardship
Outline the structure of the ESRS (environmental, social, governance, and cross-cutting standards) and explain the double materiality principle
Compare the ISSB standards (IFRS S1 and S2) with ESRS on scope, materiality, and interoperability
Explain the SFDR classification (Article 6, 8, 9) and the principal adverse impact indicators, and identify the main compliance obligations for a fund manager
Summarise the EU Taxonomy's technical screening criteria and the 'do no significant harm' principle with one worked example
Your checkpoint
A one-page comparison table of ESRS, ISSB, and SFDR covering materiality approach, mandatory status, and key disclosure requirements
ESG regulation, reporting standards (ESRS, ISSB) and stewardship & ESG in the investment process and financial analysis
Explain the UK Stewardship Code and the Shareholder Rights Directive II engagement and voting disclosure requirements
Draft an escalation strategy for a company that fails to meet an engagement objective, including timelines and possible actions
Describe how ESG data is used in reporting and assurance, and identify the main challenges of greenwashing and data quality
Connect regulatory disclosure requirements back to the investment process, showing where reported data feeds into valuation and risk models
Your checkpoint
An engagement and voting policy summary (max 2 pages) with an escalation ladder and a worked example of applying it to one holding
ESG in the investment process and financial analysis & Environmental factors and climate risk & Social factors and governance factors & ESG regulation, reporting standards (ESRS, ISSB) and stewardship
Synthesise the four domains into an integrated ESG investment thesis for one company, covering material factors, data, valuation impact, and engagement plan
Complete a timed mock exam and review every incorrect answer against the syllabus
Identify and close the three weakest knowledge areas using targeted revision and practice questions
Rehearse explaining key concepts aloud (e.g., double materiality, carbon intensity, stewardship) to test recall under exam conditions
Your checkpoint
A full mock exam score report with a written remediation plan for the three weakest topics and an integrated one-page investment thesis
Milestones
Week 2: Can compute a carbon intensity metric and explain the main ESG-return evidence without notes
Week 4: Can classify physical and transition risks and map them to portfolio holdings in under 20 minutes
Week 6: Can compare ESRS, ISSB, and SFDR from memory on materiality, scope, and mandatory status
Week 8: Mock exam score of at least 70% overall, with no domain below 60%