EPSO Numerical Reasoning case studies
EPSO Numerical Reasoning · Put your knowledge to work in context.
The EPSO numerical reasoning test is the numerical component of the computer-based reasoning battery used in European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) competitions to build reserve lists for the EU institutions. It is aimed at graduates applying for administrator (AD) or assistant (AST) profiles, and at specialists whose competition includes a reasoning battery. Questions present numerical data inside the question itself - a short text, a table or a simple chart - and ask for a single best answer from fixed options. The emphasis is on practical arithmetic under time pressure: percentages and percentage change, ratios and scaling, weighted averages, rates and time, estimation, table interpretation, work and production rates, budget arithmetic, and a small share of probability and data-sufficiency items. Topics on this exam: Percentage calculations and percentage change, Ratios, proportions and scaling, Averages, weighted averages and combined groups, Rates, speed, distance and time, Fractions, decimals and order-of-magnitude estimation, Table and chart interpretation (absolute vs relative values), Work rates, production and resource allocation, Financial and budget arithmetic (costs, revenue, indexation), Probability, combinatorics and simple counting, and Data sufficiency and logical validation of numerical statements. The EPSO Numerical Reasoning case studies are 5 cases and about 2,516 words.
1Translation contract: indexation, volume and discount
The communications unit manages a translation framework contract. In 2023 the total cost was €600,000.
389 words, about 2 min2Fleet fuel costs and electric van payback
The agency operates 240 vehicles. There are 150 diesel vans averaging 22,000 km a year, 60 petrol cars averaging 18,000 km, and 30 hybrids averaging 15,000 km.
514 words, about 3 min3Contact-centre staffing with productivity and absence
The customer service centre handles 18,000 calls in a typical week. Average handling time is 6.5 minutes.
548 words, about 3 min4Citizen satisfaction: crude versus age-standardised rates
Two regions ran the same citizen satisfaction survey. Region A received 1,200 responses; Region B received 800.
526 words, about 3 min5Grant-file audit: sampling without replacement
An audit team must review 20 grant files. Unknown to the team, 6 of the 20 contain a material error.
539 words, about 3 min