Exabeam Admin study materials
Exabeam Admin study resources

Exabeam Admin cheat sheet

Exabeam Admin · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Platform Deployment and Architecture

  • The New-Scale Platform is Exabeam's cloud-native security operations stack: data lake ingestion, correlation, UEBA/ABA analytics, and case management delivered as SaaS or in a customer cloud tenancy.

  • Deployment models: fully SaaS (Exabeam-hosted), self-hosted/on-premises for regulated data residency, and hybrid where ingestion or collection stays on-premises while analytics run in the cloud.

  • LogRhythm SIEM (now part of the Exabeam portfolio) is the self-hosted SIEM path: Data Processors, Data Indexers, and the Platform Manager form the classic three-tier topology.

  • In LogRhythm, the Data Indexer stores indexed log metadata for search; the Data Processor parses, normalizes, and enriches; the Platform Manager hosts the AI Engine, admin console, and API services.

  • Scale rule: add Data Processors for parsing throughput and Data Indexers for search/storage capacity; a single component type does not scale the other dimension.

  • Cloud-native means elastic compute and object storage for raw logs; self-hosted means fixed appliance or VM capacity that must be sized against daily ingestion volume (GB/day) plus peak multipliers.

  • High availability requires redundant Data Indexers/Processors and a load-balanced entry point; the Platform Manager is a critical singleton and must be protected by backup or clustering.

  • Network flows to confirm during deployment: syslog (514/601 UDP/TCP), TLS syslog (6514), HTTPS (443) for API/UI, and agent-to-manager channels for endpoint collection.

Quick reference

Log Ingestion, Data Pipeline Management, and Log Management

  • Ingestion paths: syslog push, log forwarders/agents, API pull (cloud audit and SaaS sources), file collection, and Exabeam/LogRhythm native integrations.

  • Normalization maps vendor fields to a common schema (user, host, source IP, destination IP, outcome, event time); unparsed or unnormalized events weaken correlation and UEBA baselines.

  • Pipeline stages: collect, parse/normalize, enrich (asset, identity, threat intel), index/store, then feed correlation and analytics; each stage can drop or delay events.

  • Time synchronization matters: event time versus ingest time skew breaks session assembly; NTP alignment across sources and collectors is a prerequisite for accurate timelines.

  • Retention is tiered: hot/searchable storage for recent data, warm/cold object storage for long-term compliance retention; retention periods are set per data type and per policy.

  • Parsing failures are diagnosed by inspecting raw versus parsed events, checking custom parser mappings, and validating message format changes after vendor upgrades.

  • Volume control levers: filter noisy low-value events at the collector, tune parser drop rules, and monitor license/ingest quota against GB/day or events-per-second budgets.

  • Log source health is measured by last-event-time monitoring and silence alerts; a source with no events for its expected interval is treated as a collection failure, not quiet.

Quick reference

UEBA and ABA Configuration

  • UEBA baselines per-entity behavior (user, host, IP, service account) over a learning window and scores deviations; ABA applies the same behavioral modeling to machine/agent activity such as service accounts and automation.

  • Session assembly groups related events into a user or entity session using correlation rules and time windows; anomalous sessions are the unit analysts investigate.

  • Risk scoring combines rule-based risk (deterministic detections) and behavioral/anomaly risk; scores aggregate per entity and decay or age over time.

  • Watchlists are curated entity groups (privileged users, executives, critical servers) used to raise or lower risk weighting and to scope detections.

  • Peer groups define the comparison population for anomaly detection; a misconfigured peer group produces false positives because the baseline is wrong.

  • Learning mode: new entities need a baseline period before anomaly scores are meaningful; expect elevated noise during initial learning and suppress or down-weight alerts then.

  • Tuning loop: review top risk contributors, adjust model thresholds, add exclusions for known-good automation, and re-validate with historical replay where available.

  • ABA-specific signals include unusual process execution, anomalous service-account logon times, and machine-to-machine traffic patterns that human-focused models would miss.

Quick reference

Threat Detection, Investigation, and Response (TDIR), Timelines, and AI Agent Workflows

  • TDIR lifecycle: detect (rules, correlation, analytics), triage (prioritize by risk and asset criticality), investigate (timeline and evidence), respond (contain, remediate), and close with documented outcome.

  • The Timeline is the investigation surface: it renders all events for an entity in chronological order, annotated with risk reasons and linked to related entities.

  • Pivoting rule: from a suspicious user, pivot to hosts, IPs, and processes; from a suspicious host, pivot to users and network peers; each pivot expands the session graph.

  • AI agent workflows automate repetitive investigation steps such as evidence gathering, enrichment lookups, and summarization, while keeping analyst approval on destructive actions.

  • Detection content includes correlation rules, anomaly models, and threat-intel matches; each detection should carry a risk reason that explains why it fired.

  • False-positive handling: suppress with narrow, documented exclusions tied to a specific entity or pattern, never broad source-wide mutes that hide real activity.

  • Case management links alerts into an incident, tracks status and ownership, and preserves the evidence trail required for audit and post-incident review.

  • Mean time to detect and mean time to respond are the primary TDIR metrics; measure them from first event time, not from alert creation time.

Quick reference

SOAR Playbooks and Investigation and Response Automation

  • A playbook is a triggered workflow of actions: trigger (alert, case, manual, schedule), enrichment steps, decision branches, and response actions with outputs.

  • Common enrichment actions: WHOIS/IP reputation, hash lookup, identity context from directory, asset criticality lookup, and prior-alert history for the entity.

  • Response actions include disabling an account, isolating a host, blocking an IP/domain, and creating or updating a case; destructive actions should require human approval gates.

  • Idempotency and error handling: playbooks must tolerate repeated triggers and API failures, with retries and fallback branches rather than silent failure.

  • Integration surface is the REST API and prebuilt connectors; credentials for connectors should use scoped service accounts, not personal admin accounts.

  • Testing methodology: run playbooks against sample alerts in a staging or sandbox context, verify each branch, then promote; log every action for audit.

  • Automation scope decision rule: automate high-volume, low-ambiguity, reversible steps; keep ambiguous or irreversible steps analyst-driven with automated evidence attached.

  • Playbook performance is measured by execution success rate, time saved per alert, and percentage of alerts auto-closed with defensible disposition.

Quick reference

Compliance, Outcomes Navigator, and Security Program Measurement

  • Outcomes Navigator maps deployed detection content and data sources to security outcomes and control frameworks, showing coverage gaps rather than raw rule counts.

  • Compliance mapping links controls (for example access control, monitoring, audit logging) to the evidence the platform produces: logs retained, alerts generated, cases closed.

  • Coverage assessment: for each framework control, confirm the required log sources are ingested, the detection exists, and the response process is documented.

  • Measurement metrics: log source coverage percentage, detection coverage per MITRE ATT&CK technique, alert-to-case conversion, and closed-case disposition rates.

  • Audit evidence must be reproducible: retention settings, access logs, and change history for rules and playbooks support examiner questions.

  • Gap remediation prioritization: missing critical log sources first, then missing high-severity detections, then process documentation gaps.

  • Dashboards should report trend over time (detections, cases, MTTD/MTTR) so program improvement is demonstrable, not a one-time snapshot.

Quick reference

Platform Administration, Access Control, and Support and Services

  • Role-based access control: assign the least-privilege role needed (analyst, responder, administrator, read-only auditor); permissions govern data visibility and action rights.

  • Authentication options include local accounts, SSO/SAML federation, and MFA; federated identity centralizes deprovisioning and reduces orphaned accounts.

  • Service accounts for API integrations should be scoped, documented, rotated on schedule, and excluded from interactive login where possible.

  • Administrative hygiene: named accounts for humans, no shared admin credentials, periodic access reviews, and audit of privilege changes.

  • Health monitoring covers ingestion volume, component status, parser failure rates, and license/quota consumption; alert on threshold breaches before they impact detection.

  • Backup and change control: export configurations (rules, watchlists, playbooks) and version them; record changes with owner, date, and reason.

  • Support engagement: gather diagnostics (component logs, timestamps, affected entities, reproduction steps) before opening a case to shorten resolution.

  • Upgrade planning: review release notes for parser and API changes, validate in non-production, and confirm integration compatibility before production rollout.