CNCDP study materials
CNCDP study resources

CNCDP cheat sheet

CNCDP · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Network Security Architecture and Design

  • Defense in depth layers controls so no single failure grants full compromise: perimeter, segmentation, endpoint, identity, data, monitoring.

  • DMZ (screened subnet) hosts internet-facing services; internal hosts must not initiate inbound connections into it except via defined management paths.

  • Network segmentation reduces blast radius: VLANs, subnets, and microsegmentation enforce east-west policy separate from north-south perimeter policy.

  • Zero Trust principles: verify explicitly, use least privilege, assume breach; identity and device posture drive access, not network location.

  • Purdue model levels 0-5 separate OT process control from enterprise IT; conduits between levels pass through firewalls with protocol-aware inspection.

  • Stateful firewalls track connection state; stateless ACLs must permit return traffic explicitly and are order-dependent (first match wins).

  • High availability: active-passive failover preserves state via session sync; active-active requires asymmetric routing controls and consistent policy.

  • Fail-closed vs fail-open: security gateways should fail closed for confidentiality-critical paths and fail open only where safety-of-life demands availability.

Quick reference

Threat Landscape and Threat Intelligence

  • Intelligence levels: strategic (leadership, risk), operational (campaigns, actors), tactical (TTPs), technical (IOCs such as hashes, IPs, domains).

  • Pyramid of Pain: hash/IP/domain IOCs are easy for adversaries to change; TTPs are hardest to change and most valuable to detect.

  • Diamond Model nodes: adversary, capability, infrastructure, victim; every event links these, and pivoting on any node expands analysis.

  • MITRE ATT&CK organizes adversary behavior into tactics (why) and techniques (how); used for detection coverage mapping, not for IOC storage.

  • Cyber Kill Chain phases: reconnaissance, weaponization, delivery, exploitation, installation, C2, actions on objectives - each offers break points.

  • IOC confidence decays; TTL and aging must be applied or detection generates false positives after infrastructure rotation.

  • Threat actors: nation-state (persistent, resourced), organized crime (financial), hacktivist (ideological), insider (authorized access).

  • STIX/TAXII: STIX is the structured language for indicators and relationships; TAXII is the transport protocol for sharing collections.

Quick reference

Vulnerability Assessment and Management

  • CVSS base score reflects intrinsic severity; temporal and environmental metrics adjust for exploit maturity and local exposure.

  • CVSS v3.1 qualitative bands: 0.0 none, 0.1-3.9 low, 4.0-6.9 medium, 7.0-8.9 high, 9.0-10.0 critical.

  • Risk-based prioritization combines severity, exploitability (KEV, EPSS), asset criticality, and compensating controls - not CVSS alone.

  • CISA KEV lists vulnerabilities with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; membership justifies accelerated remediation timelines.

  • EPSS estimates probability of exploitation in the next 30 days; high EPSS plus high CVSS is the strongest patch-first signal.

  • Authenticated (credentialed) scans find far more local issues than unauthenticated scans; unauthenticated results approximate attacker view.

  • False positive triage requires evidence: version banner alone is weak; confirm via authenticated check, backported patch status, or manual validation.

  • Remediation SLA tiers typically: critical internet-facing in days, high in weeks, medium/low in a quarter; exceptions require documented risk acceptance.

Quick reference

Security Monitoring, Detection, and Analysis

  • Detection triad: log sources (endpoint, network, identity, cloud), correlation rules, and analyst triage; missing a source creates blind spots.

  • Sigma is a vendor-neutral detection rule format; rules are converted to SIEM query languages, enabling portable logic.

  • False positive = alert fired on benign activity; false negative = malicious activity not alerted. Tuning trades one against the other.

  • Alert fidelity metrics: true positive rate, false positive rate, mean time to detect (MTTD), and detection coverage by ATT&CK technique.

  • Log retention and time synchronization (NTP) are prerequisites; unsynced clocks break correlation and forensic timelines.

  • Behavioral analytics baseline normal and flag deviation; they complement signature rules but require tuning windows to avoid noise.

  • Triage order: validate alert, scope affected assets, determine active vs historical, escalate or close with documented rationale.

  • Detection-in-depth maps each ATT&CK technique to at least one telemetry source and rule; gaps are documented as coverage debt.

Quick reference

Incident Response and Handling

  • NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle: preparation; detection and analysis; containment, eradication, and recovery; post-incident activity.

  • Containment options: isolate host, disable account, block indicator, segment network - choose based on spread risk vs business impact.

  • Order of volatility: memory and network state first, then disk, then backups and logs; collection precedes remediation when evidence matters.

  • Evidence handling: maintain chain of custody, hash at collection, store in tamper-evident location, document every transfer.

  • Communication: defined escalation matrix, single incident commander, and legal/privacy notification triggers based on data type and jurisdiction.

  • Eradication must remove root cause (persistence, credentials, implants), not just symptoms; recovery requires validation before reconnecting.

  • Post-incident review produces lessons learned, detection improvements, and control changes; track actions to closure.

  • Tabletop exercises and playbooks reduce response time; playbooks should specify decision authority and evidence retention steps.

Quick reference

Digital Forensics and Evidence Handling

  • Forensic soundness: preserve original, work on a verified copy, hash before and after (SHA-256) to prove integrity.

  • Order of volatility (RFC 3227): CPU/cache, memory, network state, running processes, disk, remote logs, archival media.

  • Write blockers prevent modification of source media during acquisition; imaging validates with a hash comparison.

  • Chain of custody records who handled evidence, when, where, and why; any gap weakens admissibility.

  • Windows artifacts: event logs, registry hives, MFT, USN journal, prefetch, shimcache, AmCache, LNK files, Volume Shadow Copies.

  • Linux artifacts: auth.log, syslog, bash history, cron, /proc, journald, and file timestamps (atime, mtime, ctime).

  • Timeline analysis correlates file system, log, and memory timestamps; normalize to UTC and note timezone sources.

  • Memory forensics reveals running processes, network connections, injected code, and credentials not present on disk.

Quick reference

Cyber Defense Operations and Threat Hunting

  • Hypothesis-driven hunting starts from an ATT&CK technique or intelligence lead, not from an alert queue.

  • Hunt loop: form hypothesis, identify required data, query, analyze, document findings, convert successful hunts into detections.

  • Pivot points: process parent-child relationships, rare command lines, unusual authentication patterns, and beaconing periodicity.

  • Living-off-the-land binaries (LOLBins) such as PowerShell, certutil, and rundll32 evade signature detection; hunt behavior, not file names.

  • Beaconing detection: regular interval connections, jitter analysis, consistent payload size, and rare destination reputation.

  • Purple teaming validates detection by executing controlled adversary techniques and measuring whether alerts fire.

  • Hunt documentation must record data sources queried, time range, queries used, and negative results to avoid duplicate effort.

  • Threat hunting differs from monitoring: hunting is proactive and hypothesis-driven; monitoring is reactive to defined alerts.

Quick reference

Governance, Risk, and Compliance

  • Risk = likelihood × impact; treatment options are mitigate, transfer, avoid, or accept, and acceptance must be documented by an accountable owner.

  • Frameworks: NIST CSF (identify, protect, detect, respond, recover, govern), ISO 27001 (ISMS), CIS Controls (prioritized safeguards).

  • Control types: preventive, detective, corrective; categories: technical, administrative, physical. Map controls to framework requirements.

  • Compliance is not security: meeting a standard is a baseline; residual risk must still be assessed against the threat landscape.

  • Policy hierarchy: policy (intent) → standard (mandatory requirement) → procedure (steps) → guideline (recommendation).

  • Third-party risk: vendor assessments, contractual security requirements, and continuous monitoring of supplier exposure.

  • Audit evidence must be current, attributable, and reproducible; control owners are accountable for evidence accuracy.

  • Metrics for governance: control coverage, open risk register items, remediation SLA adherence, and incident trend reporting.