Two Narrators, One Storm: Judging Reliability
Ms. Okafor's class compares two first-person accounts of the same moment - a storm reaching Delia's town.
Version A (Delia): "I counted the seconds between lightning and thunder the way my grandfather taught me. Four. Three. The storm was coming for us, and my shoulders dropped, as if I had been holding a door shut all afternoon."
Version B (her brother Marco): "Delia stood at the window counting out loud, which was annoying. She said the storm was 'coming for us,' which is exactly the kind of thing she says. I checked the radar on my phone. Nothing serious."
A student writes: "Marco is the more reliable narrator because he uses evidence - the radar - while Delia just has feelings." The class must decide whether that reasoning holds.
1. Explain one weakness in the student's claim that Marco is the more reliable narrator. Use details from both versions.
Read the worked answer
Reasoning path
- The claim rests on one assumption: that a narrator who cites data is automatically trustworthy. Reliability actually depends on what a narrator knows and how they treat what they do not know.
- Marco's account is shaped by irritation - "which was annoying," "exactly the kind of thing she says." That word choice shows he has already decided his sister is dramatic, so he filters her behavior through that judgment.
- His evidence is also thin. "Nothing serious" describes a screen he never quotes, and a phone radar does not measure what a storm feels like to someone standing at the window.
Conclusion: Marco may be accurate about the weather and still be an unreliable reporter of Delia. A strong answer names one specific detail of bias or vagueness and explains how it shapes what he tells the reader.
2. What does the simile "as if I had been holding a door shut all afternoon" reveal about Delia that Marco's account cannot? Explain how the comparison works.
Read the worked answer
The simile compares Delia's ordinary state to someone braced against a door - arms and shoulders locked, something pushed back. That image implies hours of effort before the storm even arrives: she has been tense, waiting, holding herself together. The next clause, "my shoulders dropped," is the release; the storm's arrival ends the waiting, and she relaxes rather than panics.
Why this matters: Marco reports only her outside - counting aloud, annoying. He cannot report the door. This is exactly the interior information first-person narration supplies, and it is what makes the student's "she just has feelings" dismissal weak: the feeling is rendered as a physical comparison a reader can picture. A full answer explains the comparison's two parts (effort, then release), not just that Delia is scared.
3. Both versions use the phrase "coming for us." Explain how the quotation marks in Version B change the way a reader hears that phrase.
Read the worked answer
In Version A the phrase is Delia's own and lands without irony - for her, the storm really is aimed at them, and the reader receives it as sincere. Marco's quotation marks mark the words as something overheard and reported, a specimen of his sister's speech. The quotes put distance between Marco and the words: this is her, not me.
For a reader who meets Version A first, that shift is a small act of dismissal. It nudges the reader to question Delia's tone rather than Marco's. A complete answer explains the change in the reader's stance toward the two characters, not merely the punctuation rule that quotation marks show someone else's words.