Sperrmüll or Recyclinghof: reading two notices against a deadline
Hypothetical written-language classroom exercise. The supplied times, local notices and marking priorities are scenario assumptions, not official Finnish rules, legal advice or medical instructions. No audio is supplied. You have rented a flat in a Berlin Altbau for six months. In the hallway, beside the letterboxes, hang two notices. The first came through your door on Monday, 28 April, from the Hausverwaltung:
„Sperrmüll: Bitte melden Sie Ihren Sperrmüll bis zum 5. Mai beim Hausmeister an. Bereitstellung am 12. Mai ab 18 Uhr im Hinterhof. Maximal 3 m³ pro Partei. Elektrogroßgeräte und Reifen sind nicht zugelassen. Stellen Sie nichts vor 18 Uhr auf die Straße – das Ordnungsamt kontrolliert.“
The second is handwritten: „Recyclinghof: Sa 9–14 Uhr. Kühlschränke nur mit Termin, Tel. im Büro.“
You want to get rid of a two-seat sofa, four wooden chairs and a broken fridge before your parents visit on 20 May. The Hausmeister's office is open Mondays and Thursdays, 8–10. For this fictional task, Büro refers to the same Hausmeister office whose hours are stated; actual furniture volume must be checked rather than assumed.
1. Sort the three items: what goes where, and by when? Show how the calendar affects the answer.
Read the worked answer
Sofa and chairs are ordinary bulky furniture, provided their measured combined volume is no more than the stated 3 m³ limit, so they are Sperrmüll. They must be registered with the Hausmeister by 5 May and are then placed in the Hinterhof on 12 May from 18:00. Calendar check: the letter is dated Monday 28 April, so 5 May is also a Monday and the office is open 8–10 that morning - the deadline day is usable, but only in that two-hour window. Miss it and there is no stated second date, so you would have to ask, not assume.
Fridge: explicitly excluded („Elektrogroßgeräte … nicht zugelassen“). It needs an appointment at the Recyclinghof, Saturday 9–14, booked by phone - and the Büro is only reachable Mondays and Thursdays 8–10, which is the real bottleneck.
2. A neighbour suggests putting everything out at 8 a.m. on 12 May. Which words in the notice make that a mistake, and what is the risk?
Read the worked answer
Two separate faults.
- „ab 18 Uhr“. The preposition „ab“ means from … onwards, never around. 8 a.m. is „vor 18 Uhr“, which the notice explicitly forbids. So no early-morning trip: the earliest legal moment is 18:00 on the 12th.
- „im Hinterhof“. The permitted place is the courtyard, not the pavement. The sentence about the street is a warning, not an alternative location.
The risk is stated in the text itself: „das Ordnungsamt kontrolliert“. The fictional notice warns of inspection; it does not specify an actual fine, enforcement outcome or legal procedure. The judgment being tested is that a single preposition („ab“) and a single noun („Hinterhof“) carry the whole instruction, while the dramatic word „Ordnungsamt“ is only the consequence.
3. You read only the first line, register everything, and carry the fridge into the Hinterhof on 12 May. What goes wrong, and what should you have done instead?
Read the worked answer
The registration covers Sperrmüll, not everything you own. The exclusion sentence - „Elektrogroßgeräte und Reifen sind nicht zugelassen“ - is in the middle of the notice and is easy to skim past, but it is the operative rule. A fridge left in the Hinterhof is therefore an unauthorised deposit even though you registered and even though you used the right place and time.
Correct sequence for the fridge: phone the Büro on a Monday or Thursday between 8 and 10 to book a Kühlschrank-Termin, then take it to the Recyclinghof on a Saturday between 9 and 14. Since your parents arrive on the 20th, the phone call is the urgent step - the Saturday trip can follow once a slot exists.