Tenant Spaces in a Multi-Tenant Office Certification
An owner-occupier holds a 1988 12-story, 240,000 sq ft office building with 420 employees and three tenants occupying 30% of the rentable area. The owner wants Fitwel v2.1 Commercial Building certification at 2 Star. The project team's pre-assessment totals 103 points, two points below the 2 Star threshold. The building has 18 secure bike racks in a basement garage, no showers, and a shared lobby with stairs but no visible stair prompts. The owner proposes counting tenant-only strategies: a tenant wellness room, stair prompts inside two tenant suites, and a tenant-run healthy snack program. The property manager says leases do not require tenant participation, and one tenant refuses access for documentation. The site has no room for new surface bike parking, but two car spaces could be converted to 40 secure bike racks at moderate cost; adding showers and lockers would require relocating a storage room at higher cost and would serve only one locker room. The owner wants the fastest path to 2 Star without overpromising.
1. What scope and evidence problems exist in counting the tenant-only strategies toward the Commercial Building scorecard, and how should the team resolve them?
Read the worked answer
The core problem is scope control. The Commercial Building scorecard is aimed at building-wide and shared/base-building conditions, while tenant-suite-only features are generally addressed under the Commercial Interior scorecard unless the scorecard explicitly permits whole-building aggregation and the landlord can document tenant participation. A tenant wellness room, in-suite stair prompts, and a tenant snack program are not automatically building strategies, especially when one tenant refuses access and no lease requires participation. The team should map each proposed strategy to the entity that controls it: landlord-controlled lobby, garage, and shared stairs can be documented by the owner; tenant-suite features require a signed lease amendment, tenant letter, access agreement, and evidence. If a tenant refuses, exclude that area and recalculate. If the owner wants tenant features counted, either negotiate binding commitments or pursue separate Commercial Interior projects. Do not claim points for spaces the certifying team cannot inspect or verify; unsupported claims create audit and reputational risk.
2. Between converting two car spaces to 40 bike racks and adding showers and lockers, which should the team pursue to close a two-point gap, and what should they check before committing?
Read the worked answer
Start by checking the exact strategy wording and pathway conditions. A bike-parking strategy may distinguish short-term visitor parking from long-term secure parking, and some pathways require showers or lockers for long-term users. If 40 secure racks alone satisfy the full requirement and earn at least two points, the conversion is likely lower cost, serves more people, and is easier to document than relocating a storage room for one locker room. But if the bike strategy requires showers to earn the point, bike-only conversion may not close the gap. Conversely, showers may unlock active-commuting points but cost more and serve fewer occupants. Because the gap is only two points, the team should also screen low-cost landlord-controlled strategies such as shared-lobby stair prompts, a tobacco-free campus policy, healthy vending, or a lactation room before committing capital. Compare cost per verified point, lost parking revenue, maintenance burden, and documentation feasibility. The decision should be based on full strategy compliance, not on the headline feature.
3. The owner wants to submit in six weeks. What documentation and tenant-coordination steps should be in the plan?
Read the worked answer
Build a strategy-by-strategy evidence matrix that names the responsible party, the controlling entity, the evidence type, and the due date. For landlord-controlled strategies, collect floor plans, photographs, policies, purchase orders, maintenance records, and signed management statements. For tenant-dependent strategies, request access, tenant letters, lease amendments, or survey results; if a tenant refuses, record the exclusion and adjust the score rather than substituting assumptions. Set up a shared evidence folder with version control and dates so reviewers can trace each claim. Run an internal mock review against the scorecard requirements and identify any strategy that depends on verbal commitments. In six weeks, lease amendments are the likely bottleneck, so prioritize owner-controlled and shared-area strategies first. If the project cannot reach the threshold with verified evidence, move the submission date or pursue a smaller, truthful scope. Do not submit tenant features that cannot be inspected or substantiated.