Nolle Prosequi and the 175-Day Speedy-Trial Clock
On January 6, 2024, Miami-Dade police arrested Daniel Reyes for felony DUI manslaughter after a collision on I-95. He was released on bond the next day. The State filed an information on February 2. On June 19, 2024-165 days after arrest-the prosecutor announced a nolle prosequi because the traffic-homicide investigator was on military leave. On July 8, 2024-184 days after arrest-the State re-filed the identical charge. Defense counsel filed a notice of expiration and motion for discharge on July 10. The trial court set a hearing for July 15. The State argues that the nolle prosequi reset the speedy-trial clock and that the re-filed case is timely because it is within 175 days of the new filing. The defense argues that the original arrest date controls. The court must decide whether to discharge Reyes, order trial within the recapture period, or deny the motion.
1. Calculate the speedy-trial deadline under Florida law and evaluate the State's argument that the nolle prosequi reset the clock. What must the trial court do at the July 15 hearing?
Read the worked answer
The felony speedy-trial period is 175 days from arrest. Counting from January 6, 2024, the deadline was June 29, 2024. The nolle prosequi on June 19 came before that deadline, but a nolle does not toll or restart the speedy-trial clock. Florida law does not permit the State to avoid the rule by dismissing and re-filing; the original arrest date controls. The re-filed case on July 8 was therefore outside the 175-day period. Because defense counsel filed a notice of expiration, the court must hold a hearing within 5 days and, if the State is not ready, order trial within the 10-day recapture period. If the State fails to bring Reyes to trial within that period, the court must discharge him. The court should reject the State's 'new filing' theory and make findings on the record.
2. Suppose the trial court finds the prosecutor acted in good faith and the investigator's military leave was unavoidable. Does that change the speedy-trial analysis? What practical and ethical steps should defense counsel take?
Read the worked answer
Good faith does not change the speedy-trial analysis. The rule is not a sanction for prosecutorial misconduct; it protects the defendant's right to a timely trial. The State's reasons may affect whether a short continuance is reasonable, but they do not reset the 175-day clock. Defense counsel should preserve the issue by filing the notice of expiration, demanding the hearing, and objecting to any trial setting outside the recapture period. If the court denies relief, counsel should make a proffer and seek review. Ethically, the prosecutor should not use a nolle prosequi to evade the rule; both sides should bring the issue to the court's attention. The defense may also argue prejudice from lost witnesses or fading evidence, but prejudice is not an element of the speedy-trial rule.