FL Criminal Trial Specialist flashcards
FL Criminal Trial Specialist · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Speedy trial recapture period
- Under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191, after a demand for speedy trial, the state has 15 days to bring the defendant to trial or the defendant is discharged.
- Double jeopardy
- The Fifth Amendment and Florida Constitution bar retrial after acquittal or conviction, except after a mistrial for manifest necessity or in separate sovereign prosecutions.
- Brady material
- Evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment; the prosecution must disclose it regardless of a discovery request, per Brady v. Maryland.
- Felony degree classification
- Florida classifies felonies as capital, life, first, second, or third degree under Fla. Stat. § 775.082, each carrying a statutory maximum sentence from death to five years.
- Territorial jurisdiction
- Florida may prosecute crimes committed within its borders; venue lies in the county where the offense occurred, with statutory exceptions for multi-county offenses.
- Affirmative defense burden
- In Florida, the defendant bears the burden of proving affirmative defenses such as insanity by clear and convincing evidence, while the state must prove all elements beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Arraignment timing
- Under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.130, a defendant in custody must be brought before the court for arraignment within 24 hours of arrest, unless waived.
- Motion to suppress
- A pretrial motion under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.190(h) asking the court to exclude evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search or seizure; the defendant must allege a violation.
- Notice of alibi
- A filing under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.200 required at least 10 days before trial, disclosing the defendant's alibi and witnesses; the state must then disclose rebuttal witnesses.
- Pretrial detention hearing
- A hearing under Fla. Stat. § 907.041 where the state seeks to detain a defendant without bail; it must occur within 5 days of filing and meet clear and convincing evidence.
- Motion for statement of particulars
- A pretrial motion under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.190(c) used when the charging document is vague, requiring the state to provide specific details of the alleged offense.
- Discovery sanctions
- Under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.220(n), a court may impose remedies for discovery violations ranging from a continuance to exclusion of evidence or dismissal, considering prejudice and willfulness.
- Bail bond forfeiture
- Governed by Fla. Stat. § 903.26–.28, the surety may be exonerated if the defendant is surrendered or failure to appear is excused; otherwise the bond is forfeited.
- Peremptory challenges
- Under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.350, each side gets 6 peremptory challenges in capital and life felonies and 3 in other felonies; challenges must be race-neutral under Batson.
- Batson challenge
- A three-step procedure: the opponent shows a prima facie case of discriminatory strike, the proponent offers a race-neutral reason, and the court decides whether purposeful discrimination occurred.
- Jury size in Florida
- Florida uses six jurors for noncapital felonies and misdemeanors and twelve for capital cases; verdicts must be unanimous in criminal cases.
- Opening statement
- A non-evidentiary address in which counsel outlines what the evidence will show; the defense may reserve its opening until after the state's case.
- Leading questions
- Questions suggesting the answer are generally improper on direct examination but permitted on cross-examination, for hostile witnesses, or for preliminary matters.
- Closing argument limits
- Counsel may not comment on the defendant's failure to testify, misstate evidence, or appeal to passion and prejudice; improper comments require a contemporaneous objection and motion for mistrial.
- Lesser-included offenses
- Offenses necessarily included in the charged crime that the court must instruct the jury on if supported by the evidence, allowing conviction on a lesser charge.
- Hung jury
- A jury unable to reach a unanimous verdict results in a mistrial; the state may retry the defendant unless double jeopardy bars retrial.
- Relevance definition
- Under Fla. Stat. § 90.401, evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact; relevant evidence may be excluded under § 90.403 if probative value is substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice.
- Hearsay definition
- Under Fla. Stat. § 90.801, an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted; admissible only if an exception or exclusion applies.
- Confrontation Clause
- The Sixth Amendment bars testimonial hearsay unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine, per Crawford v. Washington.
- Character evidence
- Generally inadmissible to prove conduct, but the defendant may open the door to reputation or opinion testimony about a pertinent trait, after which the state may rebut under § 90.404.
- Similar fact evidence
- Under Fla. Stat. § 90.404(2), evidence of other crimes or bad acts is admissible if relevant to motive, intent, absence of mistake, identity, or a common scheme.
- Best evidence rule
- Under Fla. Stat. § 90.952, the original writing, recording, or photograph is required to prove its content unless an exception applies, such as loss or destruction without bad faith.
- Expert testimony standard
- Under Fla. Stat. § 90.702, as interpreted by Daubert, expert testimony is admissible if the expert is qualified, the testimony is based on sufficient facts, reliable principles, and reliably applied.
- Attorney-client privilege
- A confidential communication between lawyer and client for legal advice is protected from disclosure; the privilege survives the client's death and may be waived only by the client.
- Prosecutor disclosure duty
- Under Florida Bar Rule 4-3.8, a prosecutor must disclose evidence tending to negate guilt or mitigate the offense and refrain from prosecuting charges not supported by probable cause.
- Candor toward tribunal
- Rule 4-3.3 prohibits knowingly making false statements of fact or law to a court and requires disclosure of adverse legal authority; candor overrides client confidentiality in limited circumstances.
- Conflict of interest
- Under Rule 4-1.7, a concurrent conflict requires informed consent confirmed in writing; conflicts involving directly adverse representation or material limitation are generally nonconsentable.