Foundations of Reading Test (FoRT) study plan
Foundations of Reading Test (FoRT) · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Foundations of Reading Development
Map the five components of reading (phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension) and label which sub-skills of Domain 1 each one draws on
Define and contrast phonological awareness, phonemic awareness, and phonics with a self-written example of each
Transcribe the full English phoneme inventory and classify each consonant by place and manner of articulation
Explain the alphabetic principle and the difference between phonemic awareness tasks that require manipulation versus identification
Your checkpoint
A one-page phoneme chart with all 44 phonemes, each paired with two example words and its articulation description, self-quizzed to 90% accuracy
Foundations of Reading Development
Sequence the stages of spelling development (pre-alphabetic through derivational) and name one diagnostic behavior for each stage
Classify a self-generated list of 40 words by syllable type (closed, open, vowel-consonant-e, vowel team, r-controlled, consonant-le) and by syllable division pattern
Distinguish synthetic, analytic, and analogy-based phonics approaches and state when each is appropriate
Apply common orthographic rules (doubling, drop-e, y-to-i, pluralization) to unfamiliar words and justify each application
Your checkpoint
A 40-word sort table organized by syllable type and orthographic rule, with a written rationale for every placement
Foundations of Reading Development & Development of Reading Comprehension
List the stages of oral language and literacy development and match each to typical grade bands
Identify the components of fluency (accuracy, rate, prosody) and describe how each is assessed and supported
Explain how vocabulary breadth and depth develop and how morphological awareness supports word learning
Contrast word-recognition models (simple view, automaticity, orthographic mapping) and state the instructional implication of each
Your checkpoint
A comparison table of three word-recognition models with a one-sentence instructional implication for each, plus a fluency component checklist
Development of Reading Comprehension
Differentiate narrative and expository text structures and identify the signal words and graphic organizers that support each
Explain the construction-integration model of comprehension and where it breaks down for struggling readers
Describe the role of background knowledge, inference generation, and metacognition in comprehension
Outline the components of explicit comprehension strategy instruction (modeling, guided practice, gradual release)
Your checkpoint
A text-structure reference sheet covering at least six structures with signal words and a matching organizer for each
Development of Reading Comprehension
Distinguish literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension questions and write two of each for a short passage you compose
Explain how academic language and disciplinary literacy demands shift across content areas
Describe evidence-based approaches for building comprehension in diverse learners, including English learners
Identify the features of effective vocabulary instruction (contextual, morphemic, repeated exposure, active processing)
Your checkpoint
A self-written 250-word passage with six labeled comprehension questions (two literal, two inferential, two evaluative) and an answer rationale for each
Reading Assessment and Instruction
Classify screening, diagnostic, progress-monitoring, and summative assessments by purpose and timing
Interpret a running record, a spelling inventory, and a phonics screener and state the instructional decision each supports
Explain reliability, validity, and bias as they apply to reading assessment and describe how to select appropriate measures
Describe how to use assessment data to form flexible groups and adjust Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruction
Your checkpoint
A data-interpretation worksheet: three fictional student profiles with assessment results, each paired with a written instructional recommendation grounded in the data
Reading Assessment and Instruction & Integration of Knowledge and Understanding (constructed response)
Practice the constructed-response format by writing a timed 30-minute response to a self-created prompt on assessment-driven instruction
Build a reusable response template (claim, evidence from scenario, instructional principle, justification) and test it against two different prompts
Identify the scoring criteria likely applied to Domain 4 responses (accuracy, use of evidence, depth of reasoning, organization) and self-score your drafts against them
Revise one draft to strengthen evidence citation and eliminate unsupported claims
Your checkpoint
Two complete timed constructed-response drafts plus a scored rubric self-evaluation identifying two specific revisions
Foundations of Reading Development & Development of Reading Comprehension & Reading Assessment and Instruction & Integration of Knowledge and Understanding (constructed response)
Take a full-length timed practice test and log every missed item by domain and sub-skill
Re-teach the three weakest sub-skills identified in the error log using your own notes and a written summary of each
Write one final timed constructed response under exam conditions and self-score it
Consolidate a one-page master review sheet of high-frequency concepts, terms, and contrasts across all four domains
Your checkpoint
An error-analysis log with every missed item categorized and a written re-teach summary for the three weakest sub-skills, plus the final constructed response
Milestones
Week 2: Score at least 85% on a self-made 30-question quiz covering phonemes, syllable types, and spelling stages; any sub-skill below 85% gets a scheduled re-review in week 3
Week 4: Explain the simple view of reading and the construction-integration model aloud in under three minutes each without notes, and correctly classify 10 sample comprehension questions as literal, inferential, or evaluative
Week 6: Given three fictional student profiles, produce written instructional recommendations that cite specific assessment evidence; score at least 4 of 5 on a self-applied evidence-and-accuracy rubric
Week 8: Achieve at least 80% overall on the full-length practice test with no single domain below 70%, and complete one constructed response within the time limit that meets all four self-scored rubric criteria