The Team That Stopped Talking
This fictional teaching scenario supplies observations for competing explanations, not a clinical assessment. A school netball team has lost four close games in a row, each by 2-4 goals. In the final quarter of the most recent game, players stopped calling for the ball, two players argued after a turnover, and the goal shooter took 11 shots but converted only 4. The coach has been using a rewards system in which players receive points for goals scored, and the top scorer gets a starting position. The captain says the team is 'playing scared' and that players are avoiding risky passes. Attendance at training is still high, but the coach notices players practising only their own shooting and not combination play.
1. Analyse the motivational climate and explain how it may be affecting performance.
Read the worked answer
The scoring reward may encourage individual comparison and self-focused practice. The observed communication problems are compatible with that explanation, but the case alone cannot prove motivation caused the losses. Ask players about their experience and compare decisions, roles and training behavior over time. A 4-from-11 shooting result does not independently diagnose anxiety or identify why shots were missed. Consider tactical supply, opposition and ordinary variation as alternative explanations.
2. Recommend changes to the reward system and to training that would build a task-involving climate, and justify each.
Read the worked answer
Recognize useful team processes, such as supporting a teammate and selecting an appropriate pass, and clarify how selection decisions are made. Trial a small-sided task with an explicitly supplied passing constraint, then compare communication and decision quality before and after. Process goals can make improvement more controllable, but they do not guarantee wins. Collect player feedback and repeated observations rather than infer success from one close game.