Shrinkage at a 12-Store Regional Retailer
A 12-store regional retailer has $18.6 million in annual sales and a 1.6% shrink rate, compared with 0.9% for its peer group. One store accounts for 2.4% shrink and 22% of sales. Known loss mix from investigations: 55% external theft, 20% internal, 25% process or administrative error. High-theft categories are small electronics, power tools, and cosmetics. The chain has EAS in four stores, analog CCTV in six, and no exception-based reporting. The loss-prevention budget is $120,000 for the year. The CFO wants a program that pays back in 12 months and asks whether to put EAS in every store or focus on the worst store. The security manager must build a defensible plan.
1. Calculate the shrink dollars, the gap to peer performance, and the budget constraint; explain what the numbers do and do not justify.
Read the worked answer
Total shrink: $18.6M x 1.6% = $297,600. Peer at 0.9% = $167,400. Gap = $130,200. The budget is $120,000, so the chain cannot buy every control at once and still cover operating costs. The gap is an annual opportunity, but not all of it is recoverable in 12 months; external theft and process error need different controls. One store at 2.4% shrink with 22% of sales: sales = $4.092M; shrink = $98,208. That store is a disproportionate loss source. The numbers justify prioritizing that store and high-theft categories, but they do not prove EAS alone will fix it. Use the loss mix to allocate: external 55%, internal 20%, process 25%.
2. Design a 12-month program with a $120k budget and show a simple payback estimate.
Read the worked answer
Allocate roughly: $45k EAS and source tags at the worst store and two high-risk stores; $25k CCTV or analytics upgrade at the worst store; $10k exception-based reporting and POS analytics; $15k training, audits, and process controls; $15k ORC intelligence and guard overtime; $10k contingency. Do not put EAS in all 12 stores. Estimate payback: if the worst store's shrink falls from 2.4% to 1.6%, savings = 0.8% x $4.092M = $32,736 per year. EAS plus CCTV and tags at that store is about $45k-$50k, so payback is roughly 1.4-1.5 years, not 12 months. To pay back in 12 months, combine with process fixes and internal controls that have faster returns, or phase the spend. State assumptions and measure results. A 12-month payback may require lower-cost controls first.
3. Define metrics and safeguards to prevent displacement and unethical monitoring.
Read the worked answer
Metrics: shrink rate by store and category, EAS alarm rate and conversion to apprehension, false-alarm rate, POS exception counts, cycle-count accuracy, and ORC cases. Use before/after comparison with a control store if possible. Safeguards: post employee-monitoring notice, limit CCTV in break and restroom areas, restrict access to video, retain only as needed, train staff on apprehension limits, and prohibit profiling. Do not use EAS alarms as the sole basis for detention. Audit the program quarterly and adjust. Displacement check: compare neighboring stores and categories; if alarms move to another entrance, fix the gap rather than adding guards indefinitely.