TPFP TI study materials
TPFP TI study resources

TPFP TI study plan

TPFP TI · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Threat Intelligence Fundamentals

  • Define the intelligence cycle's six stages and write a one-paragraph description of each stage from memory.

  • Distinguish tactical, operational, and strategic intelligence and classify ten example products you invent into the correct tier.

  • Differentiate data, information, intelligence, and knowledge, then map each term onto a stage of the intelligence cycle.

  • List the five intelligence requirements categories (strategic, priority, etc.) and draft one requirement statement for a fictional organization.

  • Explain how the 'intelligence gap' concept drives collection planning and produce a short gap list for a sample scenario.

Your checkpoint

A one-page intelligence cycle diagram plus a glossary of 15 domain terms with your own definitions and one example each.

Week 2

Threat Intelligence Fundamentals & Threat Intelligence Analysis and Production

  • Compare the main analytic frameworks (kill chain, MITRE ATT&CK, diamond model, F3EAD) and state when each is most useful.

  • Apply the diamond model to a publicly described intrusion and label all four vertices with evidence.

  • Explain the difference between indicators of compromise and indicators of attack and give three examples of each.

  • Identify at least five cognitive biases (confirmation, anchoring, availability, etc.) and describe a mitigation for each.

  • Draft a structured analytic technique (ACH or key assumptions check) applied to a simple hypothesis.

Your checkpoint

A two- to three-page analytic note that applies the diamond model and one structured technique to a fictional intrusion, including an explicit confidence statement.

Week 3

Threat Data Collection and Sources

  • Enumerate at least eight collection source categories (OSINT, commercial feeds, ISACs, honeypots, malware sandboxes, DNS/WHOIS, dark web, government advisories) and note strengths and limits of each.

  • Evaluate three open-source feeds against criteria such as timeliness, fidelity, and false-positive rate.

  • Explain the Traffic Light Protocol (TLP) 2.0 color scheme and tag five example artifacts correctly.

  • Describe the collection management process, including PIRs and source prioritization, and draft a small collection plan.

  • Identify legal and ethical constraints on collection (scraping, ToS, privacy) and document three rules you would follow.

Your checkpoint

A source evaluation matrix covering at least eight sources with scored criteria and a short written recommendation of which three you would prioritize.

Week 4

Threat Intelligence Analysis and Production

  • Produce finished intelligence in at least two formats (a short tactical report and a strategic brief) using a standard structure.

  • Write intelligence requirements and a PIR set for a fictional organization, then trace how each is satisfied.

  • Apply the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses method to a scenario with at least three hypotheses and score the evidence.

  • Calibrate confidence language (possible, likely, almost certain) and use it consistently across two products.

  • Build an indicator enrichment workflow that adds context such as infrastructure, malware family, and campaign attribution.

Your checkpoint

A finished intelligence product of 800-1,200 words with an executive summary, key judgments, confidence levels, and an indicator appendix.

Week 5

Threat Intelligence Dissemination and Sharing & Operational Security and Legal/Ethical Considerations

  • Explain the purpose and structure of sharing communities (ISACs, ISAOs, CERTs) and the role of standards such as STIX/TAXII and MISP.

  • Map the dissemination process: who needs what, in what format, and on what timeline, and draft a dissemination matrix.

  • Describe TLP handling rules and apply them to three sharing scenarios, including onward-sharing restrictions.

  • Summarize legal considerations (data protection, GDPR-style rules, handling of PII, contractual limits) and ethical duties of analysts.

  • Explain operational security practices for analysts: attribution risks, infrastructure separation, and safe handling of malware.

Your checkpoint

A dissemination and sharing policy one-pager covering audiences, formats, TLP rules, and legal/ethical guardrails, plus a completed TLP tagging exercise.

Week 6

Threat Intelligence Tools and Platforms

  • Compare at least five platform categories (TIPs, SIEM, SOAR, malware sandboxes, OSINT tooling) and state the core function of each.

  • Describe how STIX/TAXII and MISP support automated indicator exchange and outline a basic sharing workflow.

  • Set up or simulate a small indicator store and demonstrate enrichment and deduplication of at least 20 indicators.

  • Evaluate a threat intelligence platform against criteria such as integration, scoring, and workflow, and write a short comparison.

  • Explain how automation and scoring (e.g., confidence and aging) reduce alert fatigue.

Your checkpoint

A tool comparison table for five platforms plus a documented workflow showing 20 indicators collected, enriched, deduplicated, and scored.

Week 7

Threat Intelligence in Incident Response and Hunting

  • Map the intelligence cycle onto the incident response lifecycle and identify where threat intel adds value at each phase.

  • Write at least five hypothesis-driven hunting queries or logic statements based on ATT&CK techniques.

  • Explain how indicators and TTPs support detection engineering, and translate one intel report into a detection rule concept.

  • Describe the role of threat intel in triage, scoping, and containment during an incident.

  • Document a feedback loop from hunting and IR findings back into collection requirements.

Your checkpoint

A threat hunting playbook for one ATT&CK technique: hypothesis, data sources, query logic, expected evidence, and feedback steps.

Week 8

Threat Intelligence Fundamentals & Threat Intelligence Analysis and Production & Threat Intelligence Dissemination and Sharing & Operational Security and Legal/Ethical Considerations & Threat Intelligence Tools and Platforms & Threat Intelligence in Incident Response and Hunting

  • Consolidate weak areas by re-testing each domain with practice questions and logging missed concepts.

  • Produce a full mock intelligence cycle end-to-end: requirements, collection, analysis, product, and dissemination, in one scenario.

  • Review all deliverables and update the glossary and key frameworks.

  • Practice explaining five core concepts aloud in under two minutes each.

  • Build a one-page exam-day reference sheet of frameworks, TLP rules, and confidence terms.

Your checkpoint

A complete end-to-end mock intelligence package (requirements, collection plan, analytic product, dissemination note) plus a scored self-assessment across all seven domains.

Milestones

Week 2: Can define the intelligence cycle stages and correctly apply the diamond model without notes.

Week 4: Score at least 70% on a self-made 25-question quiz covering domains 1-3, and have produced one finished intelligence product.

Week 6: Can explain TLP rules, sharing standards, and platform categories, and have a working indicator workflow documented.

Week 8: Complete the end-to-end mock package and score at least 80% on a full-length practice set across all domains.