Strong reasoning and weak English results
A learner who uses ASL has recently transferred into a new school. A classroom science demonstration suggests strong reasoning: the learner predicts an outcome, explains a comparison and revises an explanation after observing new evidence. On an English-heavy written test covering the same concepts, the score is low. The available records do not describe early language access or the supports used in previous assessments. A staff member proposes diagnosing an intellectual disability from the written score alone. The family reports that the learner discusses complex practical topics in ASL at home. The teacher has saved work samples but has not yet analyzed writing separately from science knowledge. An evaluation meeting is planned with personnel who have different levels of ASL competence.
1. Distinguish the competing interpretations of the score.
Read the worked answer
The written result may reflect English demands, instructional opportunity and access as well as science knowledge. Strong observed reasoning challenges a single-score inference, but does not independently settle every possible additional learning need.
2. Specify a fair evidence-gathering plan.
Read the worked answer
Use competent language assessment, family history, accessible content tasks, writing samples and appropriate multiple measures. Separate science reasoning from English expression, document supports and interpret any adapted standardized result within its limits.