FTCE Deaf or Hard of Hearing K–12: specialist foundations study materials
FTCE Deaf or Hard of Hearing K–12: specialist foundations study resources

FTCE Deaf or Hard of Hearing K–12: specialist foundations cheat sheet

FTCE Deaf or Hard of Hearing K–12: specialist foundations · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Accessible instruction

  • Separate content goals from language and participation demands.

  • Sequence visual attention and make peer contributions accessible.

  • Interpreting facilitates communication; teachers retain instructional responsibility.

  • Check comprehension in an accessible language rather than equating quiet attention with understanding.

Quick reference

IEP and legal planning

  • Use present-level evidence, measurable goals, services and progress monitoring.

  • Consider direct communication and direct instruction as well as interpreted access.

  • Verify Florida-specific procedures rather than importing another state timeline.

  • Keep family and student participation accessible throughout planning and review.

Quick reference

Audiological foundations and technology

  • An audiogram does not measure intelligence or percentage of language understood.

  • Technology and acoustics jointly affect functional access.

  • Only trained, authorized equipment routines belong in classroom troubleshooting.

  • A hearing screening is not a complete diagnostic assessment.

Quick reference

Valid educational assessment

  • Identify the construct before selecting assessment accommodations.

  • Use multiple valid measures and competent language assessment.

  • Interpret content knowledge separately from barriers in English expression.

  • Report the access conditions under which each score or observation was obtained.

Quick reference

Historical and professional foundations

  • Distinguish educational eligibility, audiological description and cultural identity.

  • Study historical choices without imposing one approach on every learner.

  • Clarify professional roles and respect confidential records.

  • Maintain high expectations while recognizing varied language and educational histories.

Quick reference

Communication approaches and individualized access

  • ASL, manually coded English and cued speech are different systems.

  • Evaluate actual access rather than the visible presence of a method.

  • Written practice cannot certify direct communication or interpreting competence.

  • Speechreading and captions require individualized evaluation rather than assumed universal effectiveness.

Quick reference

ASL and Deaf culture

  • ASL is a natural language rather than English in signs.

  • Respect individual identity, language variation and actual family access.

  • Include meaningful community contact and direct peer communication.

  • English gloss labels do not fully encode a signed language.

Quick reference

Language and literacy development

  • Do not infer a fixed literacy ceiling from hearing status.

  • Link meaningful language, vocabulary and print through explicit instruction.

  • Teach English writing while recognizing ASL as an independent language.

  • Separate content understanding from the English forms needed to express it.