GCT-2A-324 study materials
GCT-2A-324 study resources

GCT-2A-324 cheat sheet

GCT-2A-324 · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Governance, Risk, and Compliance Fundamentals

  • Risk = likelihood × impact; a risk register records asset, threat, vulnerability, existing controls, inherent risk, residual risk, owner, and treatment decision.

  • Four risk treatments: mitigate (reduce likelihood or impact), transfer (insurance, contract), avoid (stop the activity), accept (documented tolerance by an accountable owner).

  • Inherent risk is measured before controls; residual risk after controls. A control gap exists when residual risk exceeds the stated risk appetite.

  • Qualitative scales (e.g., 1–5 likelihood × 1–5 impact) are common; semi-quantitative scoring maps bands to numeric ranges. Single Loss Expectancy = Asset Value × Exposure Factor; ALE = SLE × Annualized Rate of Occurrence.

  • Policy hierarchy: policy (management intent, mandatory) → standard (specific mandatory requirements) → procedure (step-by-step) → guideline (recommended, non-mandatory).

  • Separation of duties prevents one person from authorizing, executing, and reviewing the same transaction; least privilege and need-to-know limit access to what the role requires.

  • Compliance evidence types: policy documents, control test results, logs, access reviews, training records, and third-party attestations; evidence must be dated and traceable to the control.

  • Due care is acting on known risk (implementing controls); due diligence is the investigation that informs it. Negligence claims hinge on documented reasonable care.

  • Regulatory examples to distinguish: GDPR (EU personal data, 72-hour breach notification to supervisory authority), HIPAA (US protected health information), PCI DSS (cardholder data), SOX (financial reporting controls).

Quick reference

Security Architecture and Design

  • Defense in depth layers controls so a single failure does not compromise the asset; each layer should fail closed where availability permits.

  • Reference models: OSI seven layers vs. TCP/IP four layers; map controls to the layer they act on (e.g., TLS at transport, WAF at application).

  • Trust boundaries exist wherever data crosses between components of different trust levels; every boundary needs authentication, authorization, and logging.

  • Common architectures: DMZ with dual firewalls, zero trust (verify explicitly, least privilege, assume breach), and microsegmentation limiting east-west traffic.

  • Security models: Bell-LaPadula (confidentiality: no read up, no write down), Biba (integrity: no read down, no write up), Clark-Wilson (integrity via well-formed transactions and separation of duties).

  • Fail-safe defaults: systems deny by default; fail-open is acceptable only where safety or availability outweighs confidentiality and is explicitly documented.

  • Attack surface reduction: disable unused services and ports, remove default accounts, minimize installed software, and restrict management interfaces to dedicated networks.

  • Threat modeling (e.g., STRIDE: spoofing, tampering, repudiation, information disclosure, denial of service, elevation of privilege) is performed at design time, before code is written.

  • Virtualization and cloud shared-responsibility: the provider secures the physical and hypervisor layers; the customer secures guest OS, identity, data, and configuration.

Quick reference

Identity and Access Management

  • Authentication factors: something you know, something you have, something you are; MFA requires factors from at least two different categories.

  • Authorization models: RBAC (roles aggregate permissions), ABAC (attributes and policy conditions), MAC (labels/clearances), and rule-based access control.

  • Least privilege and separation of duties are enforced through role design; role explosion is the common failure mode of poorly governed RBAC.

  • Identity lifecycle: joiner (provision), mover (re-evaluate access), leaver (deprovision promptly); orphaned accounts are a top audit finding.

  • Access reviews (recertification) are performed periodically by resource or role owners; privileged accounts should be reviewed more frequently than standard accounts.

  • SSO via SAML or OIDC centralizes authentication; federation relies on a trusted identity provider and signed assertions/tokens that the relying party validates.

  • Privileged access management: vault credentials, just-in-time elevation, session recording, and separate administrative accounts from daily-use accounts.

  • Password storage uses salted, slow hashing (bcrypt, scrypt, Argon2, PBKDF2); plain or fast hashes (MD5, SHA-1) are unsuitable for passwords.

  • Directory protocols: LDAP for directory queries; Kerberos uses tickets (TGT, service tickets) and time-bound trust, so clock skew breaks authentication.

Quick reference

Network and Perimeter Security

  • Firewall rule design: default deny, explicit allow, least-privilege source/destination/port, and periodic rule review to remove stale rules.

  • Stateful firewalls track connection state; stateless ACLs must permit return traffic explicitly. Next-gen firewalls add application identification and IPS.

  • Network segmentation (VLANs, subnets, security groups) limits lateral movement; east-west controls matter as much as perimeter controls.

  • IDS detects and alerts (passive), IPS detects and blocks inline; signature-based detection misses novel behavior, anomaly-based detection produces false positives.

  • VPN: IPsec (AH for integrity, ESP for encryption; IKE for key exchange) vs. TLS VPNs; site-to-site vs. remote access.

  • Wireless: WPA2/WPA3 with AES-CCMP; WPA3 adds SAE to resist offline dictionary attacks. WEP and WPA/TKIP are deprecated.

  • DNS risks: cache poisoning, tunneling for exfiltration, and spoofing; mitigations include DNSSEC, response-rate limiting, and filtering resolvers.

  • DDoS defenses: rate limiting, anycast/scrubbing centers, and upstream provider filtering; volumetric attacks are absorbed, application-layer attacks need behavioral controls.

  • Zero trust network access replaces broad VPN access with per-application, identity-aware, least-privilege connections.

Quick reference

Data Protection and Cryptography

  • Symmetric encryption (AES) is fast and used for bulk data; asymmetric (RSA, ECC) solves key distribution and enables digital signatures.

  • AES key sizes: 128, 192, 256 bits. RSA keys of 2048 bits or more are current minimum; ECC offers comparable strength at much shorter key lengths.

  • Hash functions provide integrity, not confidentiality; SHA-256/SHA-3 are current; MD5 and SHA-1 are broken for collision resistance.

  • Digital signature = hash of message encrypted with sender's private key; verification uses the sender's public key and proves integrity, authenticity, and non-repudiation.

  • Modes of operation: ECB leaks patterns (avoid); CBC needs a random IV and padding; GCM provides authenticated encryption (confidentiality plus integrity).

  • Key management lifecycle: generation, distribution, storage, rotation, revocation, destruction. Keys must never be stored alongside the data they protect.

  • Data states: at rest (encryption, access control), in transit (TLS 1.2+), and in use (confidential computing, memory protections). Data classification drives control selection.

  • PKI trust: a certificate binds a public key to an identity, signed by a CA; validation checks signature chain, validity dates, revocation (CRL/OCSP), and hostname.

  • TLS 1.2/1.3 with strong cipher suites; certificate pinning reduces MITM risk in mobile apps but complicates rotation. Perfect forward secrecy requires ephemeral key exchange (ECDHE).

Quick reference

Threat Detection, Monitoring, and Incident Response

  • Incident response phases: preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned (post-incident review).

  • Containment options: isolate host from network, disable account, block indicator at perimeter, or snapshot for forensics; preserve volatile evidence before shutdown when possible.

  • Evidence handling: order of volatility (CPU/registers → memory → network state → disk → backups), chain of custody, hashing of images, and write blockers.

  • Detection sources: SIEM correlation, EDR telemetry, IDS/IPS alerts, authentication logs, DNS and proxy logs, and cloud audit trails.

  • Key metrics: MTTD (mean time to detect), MTTR (mean time to respond/recover), alert false-positive rate, and percentage of incidents detected internally vs. externally.

  • Log management: centralized collection, synchronized time (NTP), retention per policy/regulation, and integrity protection so logs cannot be altered by an attacker.

  • MITRE ATT&CK maps adversary tactics and techniques to detections; coverage gaps are identified by comparing telemetry to technique coverage.

  • Escalation and communication: defined severity tiers, on-call rotation, executive and legal notification triggers, and regulatory breach-reporting deadlines.

  • Tabletop exercises and purple-team validation test the plan without live production impact; findings feed back into detection engineering.

Quick reference

Vulnerability Management and Secure Development

  • Vulnerability lifecycle: discover (scan), validate (confirm exploitability/false positive), prioritize (CVSS + exploitability + asset criticality), remediate, verify, and report.

  • CVSS base score (0–10) reflects intrinsic severity; temporal and environmental scores adjust for exploit maturity and local context. CVSS alone does not equal business risk.

  • Severity bands: 0.1–3.9 low, 4.0–6.9 medium, 7.0–8.9 high, 9.0–10.0 critical.

  • Remediation SLAs are tiered by severity and asset exposure (e.g., internet-facing critical faster than internal low); compensating controls apply when patching is delayed.

  • SAST analyzes source code (white box) early; DAST tests running applications (black box); SCA identifies vulnerable open-source dependencies; IAST combines runtime instrumentation.

  • Secure SDLC gates: threat modeling at design, code review and SAST at build, DAST/pen testing before release, and dependency scanning continuously.

  • OWASP Top 10 categories include injection, broken access control, cryptographic failures, and security misconfiguration; input validation and parameterized queries prevent injection.

  • Penetration testing requires written authorization and defined scope; testing without authorization is a legal, not a technical, failure.

  • Patch management: inventory assets, test patches, deploy in risk order, verify installation, and track exceptions with expiry dates.

Quick reference

Third-Party and Supply Chain Risk

  • Due diligence before onboarding: security questionnaire, independent attestations (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001), financial stability, and breach history.

  • SOC 2 Type II covers an audit period and tests control operation; Type I covers a point in time. ISO 27001 certification covers the ISMS, not a specific service's controls.

  • Contract terms to require: right to audit, breach notification timelines, data ownership and return/deletion, subcontractor approval, and security obligations with remedies.

  • Tier vendors by data sensitivity and access level; critical vendors receive deeper assessment and more frequent review.

  • Fourth-party risk: subcontractors and cloud dependencies can undermine a vendor's controls; require disclosure of critical subprocessors.

  • Concentration risk: over-reliance on a single vendor or shared provider creates correlated failure; identify and plan alternatives for critical services.

  • Software supply chain: SBOM (e.g., SPDX, CycloneDX) inventories components; verify provenance and signatures, monitor dependencies for known vulnerabilities, and pin versions.

  • Continuous monitoring after onboarding: periodic reassessment, review of new attestations, tracking of vendor security incidents, and offboarding with access revocation and data destruction confirmation.

  • Vendor risk acceptance must be documented with an accountable owner and review date; unmanaged exceptions are audit findings.