Priya's Ten Minutes: Which Revision Actually Raises the Score
Priya is revising an opinion paragraph for a timed writing task (35 minutes; at least four sentences of support). Her claim: fourth graders should have twenty extra minutes of recess each day. Her draft reads: "Our class should get twenty more minutes of recess. Recess helps students focus in class it also gives them exercise. When we come back inside we are ready to learn. Some kids don't like recess but they can read instead. Our class talked too much during math last week, so we need more recess. Also it is good for you." Her teacher's notes say: one run-on, one pronoun with no clear referent, one reason that does not support the claim, and a vague ending. Priya thinks the paragraph is fine because every sentence is about recess and there are no spelling errors. She has ten minutes left and wants to know which fix matters most for her score.
1. Identify the run-on sentence. Write two different ways to fix it, and explain which fix makes Priya's reasoning clearer.
Read the worked answer
The run-on: "Recess helps students focus in class it also gives them exercise." Two independent clauses are jammed together with no punctuation or conjunction.
Fix A (split): "Recess helps students focus in class. It also gives them exercise." Fix B (join): "Recess helps students focus in class, and it also gives them exercise."
Which is better here: Fix A. Focus and exercise are two separate reasons, and splitting them lets Priya develop each one with its own supporting sentence. Fix B is grammatically correct, but it packages two reasons as one item, which invites exactly the vague follow-up she already has.
The general principle: punctuation choices are also thinking choices. When two ideas could each carry a reason, split them. When the second idea depends on the first, join them. Priya should split, then add a concrete detail under each half.
2. Find the pronoun with no clear referent, name it, and rewrite that sentence so the meaning is unmistakable. Explain why the revision is worth her remaining time.
Read the worked answer
The problem pronoun is "it" in "Also it is good for you." The reader cannot tell whether "it" means recess, exercise, or the extra twenty minutes. The sentence also floats free of the claim, so it functions as a vague endorsement rather than support.
Rewrite options: "Twenty extra minutes of running and playing also gives students the exercise they need each day." Or: "That extra time outdoors is good for students' health, not just their focus."
Why this is worth the time: on a scored response, an unclear pronoun costs clarity points, and a vague closer is the last thing a reader sees. With ten minutes left, Priya should spend them on the two fixes with the highest payoff - splitting the run-on and replacing this sentence with a specific benefit tied to the claim. Naming the referent takes one minute; leaving it costs the reader's confidence in every other sentence.
3. Priya thinks all her support is good because it is about recess. Which sentence should be cut or replaced, and what should replace it? Explain the test you used.
Read the worked answer
Cut or replace: "Our class talked too much during math last week, so we need more recess." It is on-topic, but it does not support the claim that extra recess helps. It reports one incident and then asserts a solution; the word "so" hides a missing step. It also frames recess as a consequence for misbehavior, which invites the reply, "Then fix the talking, not the schedule."
The test: for each sentence ask, "If this sentence were false, would my claim be weaker?" If yes, it is support. If the claim survives deletion, the sentence is filler. Here the claim survives, so the sentence goes.
A replacement that passes: "When we come back from recess, our class reads for twenty minutes without anyone getting out of their seat." That is a specific, observable result tied to focus. It is not proof, but it is the kind of classroom example a fourth-grade opinion piece can actually defend.