Crib sheet found during Paper 2 and pressure to keep it quiet
During Mathematics Paper 2 at a centre with 212 candidates, invigilator Ms. Boateng sees a folded strip of paper under the answer booklet of candidate index 0047. It contains three quadratic formulas. The candidate says he used it for revision before the paper and forgot it in his pencil case; he says he did not look at it during the examination. The supervisor collects the paper but does not write an incident report, because the school's head teacher says the school already has a warning from a previous year and a formal report could lead to the whole centre being de-recognised. The head teacher proposes to 'deal with it internally' and let the candidate finish. Ms. Boateng is due to hand over her scripts in two hours and asks the district officer for advice by phone.
1. What must Ms. Boateng and the supervisor do before the scripts leave the centre?
Read the worked answer
The priority is to create a contemporaneous record while memories and evidence are fresh. The supervisor should:
- take possession of the strip and the candidate's answer booklet and keep them separate from other scripts;
- write an incident report stating the time, the candidate's index number, where the paper was found, what it contained, and what the candidate said;
- ask the candidate to sign the report, or record that he declined;
- have Ms. Boateng write her own statement as the finder;
- inform the district officer immediately, before the scripts are dispatched;
- seal the strip and the booklet in an envelope with the report, and record the chain of custody.
Whether the candidate is allowed to finish is a decision for the supervisor under the board's rules; the safe course is to follow the rule and document it, not to make an ad hoc exception. The district officer's advice should be recorded with the time of the call. The reasoning is that the board can only act on evidence; an unwritten incident becomes a disputed memory, and the centre loses the chance to show that it handled the matter properly.
2. Distinguish candidate malpractice from centre irregularity, and explain why the distinction matters here.
Read the worked answer
Candidate malpractice is an act by the candidate: bringing a crib sheet into the examination room, whether or not it was used, is normally treated as possession of unauthorised material. Centre irregularity is a failure by the centre: here, the proposed suppression of the incident and the failure to report it.
The distinction matters because the two are investigated differently and can attract different sanctions. The candidate's paper may be cancelled or the subject result withheld pending investigation. The centre may be warned, de-recognised, or have its results scrutinised. If the incident is suppressed, a single candidate's problem becomes a centre-wide problem: the board may later discover the strip or a leak, and the centre's silence will look like complicity.
The evidence also differs. For the candidate, the strip, the booklet and the statements are enough to begin. For the centre, the board needs the report, the timestamps and the supervisor's account. Suppression destroys the second set of evidence while leaving the first intact.
3. The head teacher argues that a report will punish 212 candidates for one boy's mistake. How should the district officer respond?
Read the worked answer
The district officer should separate reporting from punishment. A report is not a finding of guilt; it is the evidence the board needs to decide proportionately. Suppressing it does not protect the 212 candidates; it exposes them to a greater risk, because an unreported incident that later surfaces can lead to a wider investigation and to sanctions that fall on the whole centre.
The officer should also address the fear directly. The board can consider the centre's previous warning as a separate matter; a prompt, honest report is mitigating, while concealment is aggravating. The head teacher should be told the correct channel: a written incident report from the supervisor, with the candidate's statement and the evidence, plus a covering letter from the school explaining its supervision arrangements. The officer should offer to attend or to take the report by phone and confirm it in writing.
Finally, the officer should put the instruction in writing so that Ms. Boateng is protected for having reported. The message is that the centre's duty is to preserve the record, not to decide the outcome.