GISI Foundation study materials
GISI Foundation study resources

GISI Foundation study plan

GISI Foundation · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Data Fundamentals

  • Define vector, raster, and attribute data models in your own words and give two realistic use cases for each

  • Classify ten sample datasets by geometry type, dimension, and scale (nominal through ratio) with written justification

  • Explain how topology, spatial relationships, and spatial indexing affect query performance in at least five worked examples

  • Distinguish GIS from CAD, remote sensing, and web mapping by listing the core capabilities unique to each

Your checkpoint

A one-page concept map plus a 10-row dataset classification table covering all four domains of spatial data fundamentals

Week 2

Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Data Fundamentals & Spatial Data Models, Structures, and Database Concepts

  • Compare shapefile, GeoJSON, GeoPackage, and file geodatabase on geometry support, attribute limits, indexing, and portability in a written matrix

  • Design a normalized schema with at least three tables for a realistic asset-inventory dataset, including primary and foreign keys

  • Write five SQL queries that join attribute tables and filter by spatial predicate, and explain the expected result of each

  • Describe how spatial indexes such as R-trees and quadtrees reduce candidate features before exact geometry tests

Your checkpoint

A schema diagram with DDL-style table definitions and five annotated SQL queries that run against a small sample dataset

Week 3

Spatial Reference Systems, Projections, and Coordinate Geometry

  • Explain geographic versus projected coordinate systems and identify when each is appropriate

  • Convert coordinates between decimal degrees and degrees-minutes-seconds for at least six sample points without error

  • Compare conformal, equal-area, equidistant, and compromise projections by distortion property and give one suitable use per class

  • Select and justify a projected CRS for three scenarios: a national land-cover map, a city utility network, and a polar research study

  • Diagnose datum-shift error by computing the approximate offset between two datums at a given latitude and longitude

Your checkpoint

A projection selection worksheet with three justified CRS choices, six coordinate conversions, and one worked datum-shift calculation

Week 4

Spatial Analysis and Geoprocessing Methods

  • Execute overlay operations (intersect, union, clip, erase) on sample layers and document how each changes geometry and attributes

  • Perform buffer, dissolve, and spatial join workflows and verify outputs against hand-checked counts

  • Apply selection by location and by attribute to answer three spatial questions and record the query logic used

  • Explain how spatial autocorrelation and the modifiable areal unit problem can bias an analysis conclusion

Your checkpoint

A geoprocessing lab report with before/after feature counts, screenshots described in text, and one paragraph on methodological limitations

Week 5

Spatial Analysis and Geoprocessing Methods

  • Compute slope, aspect, and hillshade from a sample elevation raster and interpret what each output represents

  • Run a suitability analysis combining at least three weighted criteria and justify the weights chosen

  • Compare interpolation methods such as IDW and kriging by assumption, input needs, and output behavior

  • Interpret z-scores and p-values from a hot-spot analysis and state what the result does and does not prove

Your checkpoint

A weighted suitability model write-up with criteria table, weight rationale, and an interpretation of the resulting hot-spot output

Week 6

Cartographic Design, Visualization, and Map Production

  • Design a map layout that applies visual hierarchy, figure-ground contrast, and appropriate label placement

  • Choose classification schemes (equal interval, quantile, natural breaks) for the same dataset and explain how each changes the message

  • Select color ramps that remain readable for color-vision-deficient viewers and document the choice

  • Write a complete map including title, legend, scale bar, north arrow, source note, and projection statement

Your checkpoint

Two finished map layouts of the same data using different classification schemes, each with a short design rationale note

Week 7

Data Quality, Metadata, Standards, and Governance

  • Identify and correct at least eight data quality defects (slivers, gaps, duplicates, invalid geometry, outliers) in a sample dataset

  • Write metadata for a dataset that covers lineage, positional and attribute accuracy, currency, and access constraints

  • Apply topology rules to enforce at least three integrity constraints and verify violations are caught

  • Explain how FGDC, ISO 19115, and OGC standards differ in scope and where each is typically required

Your checkpoint

A data quality report listing defects found, fixes applied, and a complete metadata record for one dataset

Week 8

GIS Professional Practice, Ethics, and Project Workflow & Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Data Fundamentals

  • Draft a project workflow from requirements gathering through data acquisition, analysis, QA, delivery, and archival

  • Analyze three ethics scenarios involving privacy, sensitive locations, or data misrepresentation and state the defensible action for each

  • Review the full syllabus, list weak areas from earlier weeks, and build a targeted review checklist

  • Complete a timed mixed-domain practice set and log every missed question by domain

Your checkpoint

A project workflow document plus a prioritized review checklist mapping each weak domain to a specific remediation action

Milestones

Week 2: Can explain vector versus raster trade-offs and sketch a normalized three-table schema from memory without notes

Week 4: Scores at least 75 percent on a self-made 20-question set covering domains 1 through 4, with overlay and CRS errors below three

Week 6: Produces a complete, legible map with correct classification rationale and no missing layout elements in under 45 minutes

Week 8: Scores at least 80 percent on a timed mixed-domain practice set and has a written remediation action for every missed domain