GISI Foundation study plan
GISI Foundation · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Data Fundamentals
Define vector, raster, and attribute data models in your own words and give two realistic use cases for each
Classify ten sample datasets by geometry type, dimension, and scale (nominal through ratio) with written justification
Explain how topology, spatial relationships, and spatial indexing affect query performance in at least five worked examples
Distinguish GIS from CAD, remote sensing, and web mapping by listing the core capabilities unique to each
Your checkpoint
A one-page concept map plus a 10-row dataset classification table covering all four domains of spatial data fundamentals
Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Data Fundamentals & Spatial Data Models, Structures, and Database Concepts
Compare shapefile, GeoJSON, GeoPackage, and file geodatabase on geometry support, attribute limits, indexing, and portability in a written matrix
Design a normalized schema with at least three tables for a realistic asset-inventory dataset, including primary and foreign keys
Write five SQL queries that join attribute tables and filter by spatial predicate, and explain the expected result of each
Describe how spatial indexes such as R-trees and quadtrees reduce candidate features before exact geometry tests
Your checkpoint
A schema diagram with DDL-style table definitions and five annotated SQL queries that run against a small sample dataset
Spatial Reference Systems, Projections, and Coordinate Geometry
Explain geographic versus projected coordinate systems and identify when each is appropriate
Convert coordinates between decimal degrees and degrees-minutes-seconds for at least six sample points without error
Compare conformal, equal-area, equidistant, and compromise projections by distortion property and give one suitable use per class
Select and justify a projected CRS for three scenarios: a national land-cover map, a city utility network, and a polar research study
Diagnose datum-shift error by computing the approximate offset between two datums at a given latitude and longitude
Your checkpoint
A projection selection worksheet with three justified CRS choices, six coordinate conversions, and one worked datum-shift calculation
Spatial Analysis and Geoprocessing Methods
Execute overlay operations (intersect, union, clip, erase) on sample layers and document how each changes geometry and attributes
Perform buffer, dissolve, and spatial join workflows and verify outputs against hand-checked counts
Apply selection by location and by attribute to answer three spatial questions and record the query logic used
Explain how spatial autocorrelation and the modifiable areal unit problem can bias an analysis conclusion
Your checkpoint
A geoprocessing lab report with before/after feature counts, screenshots described in text, and one paragraph on methodological limitations
Spatial Analysis and Geoprocessing Methods
Compute slope, aspect, and hillshade from a sample elevation raster and interpret what each output represents
Run a suitability analysis combining at least three weighted criteria and justify the weights chosen
Compare interpolation methods such as IDW and kriging by assumption, input needs, and output behavior
Interpret z-scores and p-values from a hot-spot analysis and state what the result does and does not prove
Your checkpoint
A weighted suitability model write-up with criteria table, weight rationale, and an interpretation of the resulting hot-spot output
Cartographic Design, Visualization, and Map Production
Design a map layout that applies visual hierarchy, figure-ground contrast, and appropriate label placement
Choose classification schemes (equal interval, quantile, natural breaks) for the same dataset and explain how each changes the message
Select color ramps that remain readable for color-vision-deficient viewers and document the choice
Write a complete map including title, legend, scale bar, north arrow, source note, and projection statement
Your checkpoint
Two finished map layouts of the same data using different classification schemes, each with a short design rationale note
Data Quality, Metadata, Standards, and Governance
Identify and correct at least eight data quality defects (slivers, gaps, duplicates, invalid geometry, outliers) in a sample dataset
Write metadata for a dataset that covers lineage, positional and attribute accuracy, currency, and access constraints
Apply topology rules to enforce at least three integrity constraints and verify violations are caught
Explain how FGDC, ISO 19115, and OGC standards differ in scope and where each is typically required
Your checkpoint
A data quality report listing defects found, fixes applied, and a complete metadata record for one dataset
GIS Professional Practice, Ethics, and Project Workflow & Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Data Fundamentals
Draft a project workflow from requirements gathering through data acquisition, analysis, QA, delivery, and archival
Analyze three ethics scenarios involving privacy, sensitive locations, or data misrepresentation and state the defensible action for each
Review the full syllabus, list weak areas from earlier weeks, and build a targeted review checklist
Complete a timed mixed-domain practice set and log every missed question by domain
Your checkpoint
A project workflow document plus a prioritized review checklist mapping each weak domain to a specific remediation action
Milestones
Week 2: Can explain vector versus raster trade-offs and sketch a normalized three-table schema from memory without notes
Week 4: Scores at least 75 percent on a self-made 20-question set covering domains 1 through 4, with overlay and CRS errors below three
Week 6: Produces a complete, legible map with correct classification rationale and no missing layout elements in under 45 minutes
Week 8: Scores at least 80 percent on a timed mixed-domain practice set and has a written remediation action for every missed domain