'Ama Cannot Read the Board'
Ama is 12 and in JHS 1 at a rural day school. She has low vision: she can read print held about 10 cm from her face, but cannot read the chalkboard from beyond roughly 1.5 m, and she copies notes very slowly. She has never had an eye examination; spectacles were recommended two years ago but her family could not pay the GHS 350. Her class has 55 learners, no electricity and one chalkboard; the district Special Needs Education Officer visits once a term. Ama walks 30 minutes to school, cares for two younger siblings after school, and is in the top five in Oral English but near the bottom in Written English. Her father earns about GHS 40 on a good day. The headteacher has told staff that the school 'cannot handle her' and has suggested transferring her to a special school 40 km away, where she would have to board. Ama has said she does not want to leave, and her parents cannot afford the boarding fee.
1. Should Ama be transferred to the special school? Advise the headteacher, weighing the principles and the practical constraints.
Read the worked answer
Recommendation: no transfer on these facts. Build a support plan in the current school, and start a referral pathway in parallel.
The principle. Ghana's Inclusive Education Policy commits the system to educating learners with disabilities in ordinary schools, with special schools reserved for learners whose needs genuinely cannot be met in a mainstream setting. The Education Act, 2008 (Act 778) makes basic education a right and a compulsory entitlement, not a placement the school offers when it is convenient. Ama's need - access to print at a readable distance - is one of the most tractable needs in the whole field of special education. It does not require a residential placement.
The evidence against transfer. Ama is in the top five for Oral English, which means her hearing, comprehension and oral participation are strong; her weakness is confined to written English, which is exactly what you would expect from a learner who cannot see the board. Her difficulty is an access problem, not a learning-capacity problem. Transferring her to a boarding school 40 km away would separate her from her family, remove her from the siblings she cares for, cost money her parents do not have, and would probably take her out of school altogether rather than into another one. Where transfer quietly becomes dropping out, the school has solved its staffing problem by removing the child.
Taking the headteacher's concern seriously rather than dismissing it. He is right that the school currently has no capacity - 55 learners, no electricity, a visiting officer once a term. But the correct response to a capacity gap is a support plan, not exclusion. The first step is referral: a functional vision assessment through the district Special Needs Education Officer, and a referral for a proper eye examination through the district health service, which may resolve the spectacle question or identify a condition that needs treatment. Ama has never been examined - that is the failure to fix first.
What to say to the parents. Be honest that the school will make changes, be honest about what it cannot do, and be clear that the decision is theirs and Ama's, not the school's.
2. Identify and justify eight adjustments that Ama's teachers can make at little or no cost, and explain how each one works.
Read the worked answer
- Seat her within 1.5 m of the board, on the side of the room where the light falls on the board rather than behind her. This is free and it is the single highest-impact change; her stated limit defines the seating requirement.
- Write bigger, and use high-contrast chalk. White or yellow chalk on a clean, damp-wiped board; avoid red, green and pale blue, which disappear at distance and for many low-vision learners. Also read aloud what you have written.
- Narrate while writing. 'I am writing the three causes - the first is…' This lets her take in content through hearing while her eyes are struggling, and benefits every learner in a class of 55.
- Provide a print copy of board notes. A photocopy enlarged to about 150% costs a few pesewas; if photocopying is not possible, a handwritten copy made once and reused across the week, or a typed sheet from a phone. This removes the copying bottleneck, which is where she is losing most marks.
- Pair her with a note-taking buddy, and rotate the buddy. Do not let one learner carry the burden indefinitely; rotate fortnightly and keep it low-key so it does not mark Ama out.
- Give instructions orally and check them orally. 'Ama, tell me what you are supposed to do first.' Written instructions on the board alone will not reach her.
- Allow her to move to the board when she needs to read something specific, without asking permission each time - a standing agreement. It costs nothing and it protects her dignity compared with constant public requests.
- Give extra time for written work and reduce copying-heavy tasks. Copying a long passage is not the skill being assessed in most subjects; if it is, assess it separately and with time allowance.
Justification as a group: every one of these removes a barrier between Ama and the same curriculum the others are following; none lowers the standard. Note also what is not on the list: seating her at the back 'so she is not disturbed', excusing her from written work, or writing her off as slow - each of which would convert an access problem into an attainment problem.
3. How should Ama be assessed so that her results are valid, comparable with her classmates, and useful for planning?
Read the worked answer
Start from the construct. Ask what each assessment is meant to measure. In Written English, if the target is 'can write a paragraph with a topic sentence and supporting detail', then her inability to copy quickly from the board is irrelevant and must not depress the score. If the target is reading fluency, then a timed reading test with standard print will measure her eyes, not her reading - that score would be invalid.
Accommodations that preserve the construct:
- Enlarged print (roughly 150%, high contrast, uncluttered layout) for all test papers and class tests.
- Extra time, typically 25–50% depending on the reading load, applied consistently rather than case by case.
- Oral administration of instructions, and of questions where the test is not testing reading.
- A separate or front-row room only if genuinely needed - separation should be the last resort, because it is stigmatising and unnecessary for most tasks.
- Record the accommodation. A short note on the mark sheet and in the SBA record saying 'enlarged print; +25% time' means the next teacher can interpret the score correctly.
What must not happen: reducing the pass mark, excusing her from assessment, or assessing her only orally in every subject. Each of those makes her results non-comparable and means nobody knows what she can actually do; in the long run it also means she arrives at the BECE with no practice at the format.
Use the results diagnostically. Her profile - strong oral, weak written - should be checked against the accommodation hypothesis: if written scores rise once copying is removed, the barrier was access. If they do not rise, there is a genuine writing or spelling difficulty that needs teaching, and the school should not attribute everything to her vision.
Close the loop. Feed the findings into her individual support plan, share them with the parents in plain language, and pass them to the next year's teachers. Assessment that does not change what happens next has only produced a number.