GTLE Economics study plan
GTLE Economics · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Economics content knowledge (subject specialization)
Map the Domain 1 blueprint into microeconomic and macroeconomic subtopics, then rank each subtopic by weight and by your current confidence
Derive and explain the core microeconomic models from first principles: scarcity and opportunity cost, comparative advantage, supply and demand equilibrium, and elasticity
Compute price, income, and cross-price elasticities from given data and interpret each coefficient in a short written paragraph
Build a one-page formula and graph reference sheet that you will reuse every week
Your checkpoint
A ranked Domain 1 subtopic tracker plus a one-page formula and graph sheet, self-scored against a 20-question diagnostic
Economics content knowledge (subject specialization)
Analyze consumer choice using indifference curves, budget constraints, and marginal utility, and predict substitution and income effects
Distinguish market structures (perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, oligopoly) and predict price and output outcomes in each
Explain how firms set output where marginal revenue equals marginal cost and derive short-run versus long-run supply behavior
Apply welfare analysis to consumer and producer surplus, including the deadweight loss of taxes, price floors, and price ceilings
Your checkpoint
A written market-structure comparison table with worked numerical examples for at least three structures
Economics content knowledge (subject specialization)
Interpret national income accounts and compute GDP using expenditure and income approaches, distinguishing nominal from real and GDP from GNP
Model aggregate demand and aggregate supply and diagnose short-run versus long-run adjustment to demand and supply shocks
Differentiate the major schools of macroeconomic thought and explain what each predicts for policy effectiveness
Explain the money supply process, central bank tools, and the transmission channels from policy rate to output and prices
Your checkpoint
A five-question macro problem set solved under exam timing with a written error log
Economics content knowledge (subject specialization)
Explain fiscal policy multipliers, automatic stabilizers, and the crowding-out debate with reference to specific conditions
Analyze inflation types, the Phillips curve trade-off, and the expectations channel in wage and price setting
Apply international trade theory to tariffs, quotas, and exchange-rate regimes, predicting winners and losers in each case
Synthesize market failure, externalities, public goods, and asymmetric information into policy prescriptions
Your checkpoint
A timed 40-question Domain 1 mock scored by subtopic, with every missed item rewritten as a corrected concept note
Professional knowledge and practice (pedagogy, curriculum, assessment)
Deconstruct the Domain 2 standards into assessable learning objectives written at the analysis and evaluation levels
Design a unit sequence that builds economic reasoning through data interpretation and model application rather than recall
Construct a summative assessment blueprint that samples content and cognitive levels proportionally
Write and apply a scoring rubric for an extended economic-reasoning response
Your checkpoint
A complete unit plan with an assessment blueprint and one analytic rubric, reviewed against the standards checklist
Professional knowledge and practice (pedagogy, curriculum, assessment) & Professional values, ethics and legal/regulatory framework
Select and justify instructional strategies for common economic misconceptions, including zero-sum thinking and confusion of correlation with causation
Analyze assessment data to identify item bias, miskeying, and distractor patterns, then revise two flawed items
Interpret the legal and regulatory framework governing teacher conduct, student records, and mandated reporting in your jurisdiction
Apply an ethical decision-making model to two realistic scenarios involving confidentiality, fairness in grading, and conflict of interest
Your checkpoint
A two-item revision portfolio with a written rationale plus a scenario response memo citing the applicable rules
Professional values, ethics and legal/regulatory framework & Economics content knowledge (subject specialization)
Explain professional standards for integrity, impartiality, and appropriate teacher-student boundaries with concrete behavioral examples
Distinguish legal obligations from ethical aspirations when the two diverge, and justify a defensible course of action
Revisit the three weakest Domain 1 subtopics from your week 4 mock and resolve each with fresh worked problems
Explain how to handle assessment security, accommodations, and accessibility obligations without compromising validity
Your checkpoint
An ethics and legal quick-reference card covering at least ten rules, each with a scenario trigger and required action
Economics content knowledge (subject specialization) & Professional knowledge and practice (pedagogy, curriculum, assessment) & Professional values, ethics and legal/regulatory framework
Complete two full-length timed simulations under exam conditions and score them by domain
Diagnose remaining error patterns and close the top three gaps with targeted practice
Rehearse written and constructed-response answers against the rubric under time pressure
Finalize a test-day plan covering timing allocation, item-flagging strategy, and anxiety management
Your checkpoint
A final readiness report showing domain-level scores on both simulations, a closed-gap list, and a one-page test-day plan
Milestones
Week 2: Score at least 70 percent on an untimed 30-question Domain 1 set covering microeconomics, and explain every missed item aloud without notes
Week 4: Complete the timed 40-question Domain 1 mock at 75 percent or better, with no single subtopic below 60 percent
Week 6: Produce a unit plan, blueprint, and rubric that pass a self-review checklist, and correctly resolve both ethics scenarios using cited rules
Week 8: Average 80 percent or better across two full-length simulations with every domain at or above 70 percent, and complete the test-day plan