Bail, Remand and the Missing Witness Statements
Ama Serwaa, 34, a trader, is arraigned in the District Court, Accra, on a charge of robbery, contrary to section 148 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29). The prosecution alleges that she and two others took GH¢12,000 from a mobile-money vendor at cutlass point. Ama denies participation; she says she was at her stall and has receipts. She is five months pregnant, has a fixed address, and has two sureties willing to deposit GH¢20,000 each. The prosecution opposes bail on the ground that investigations are ongoing and that the cutlass has not been recovered. The District Court has already remanded her twice, for two weeks each time, on the prosecution’s application. No witness statements have been served. Her lawyer wants to apply for bail immediately and, if refused, to take the matter to the High Court.
1. Can the District Court grant bail on this charge? Explain the jurisdictional and substantive considerations.
Read the worked answer
The District Court is not automatically barred from considering bail merely because robbery is serious. Under Article 14(4) and (5) the court before which the accused is first brought may admit her to bail, and the Bail Act, 1997 (Act 558) governs the discretion. But the court must keep its jurisdiction in mind: robbery is an indictable offence and the District Court’s trial and sentencing powers are limited. If the court considers the charge grave, it may decline bail and leave it to the High Court.
Substantively, bail is not punishment and the prosecution cannot rely on the mere phrase ‘investigations ongoing.’ The court should weigh the seriousness of the allegation, the strength of the case, the risk of flight, the risk of interference, the accused’s antecedents, health, fixed address, sureties and the likely delay. Pregnancy and stable community ties are relevant but not decisive. The absence of witness statements after four weeks undermines the claim that investigation is moving quickly. The District Court can grant bail with conditions or refuse with reasons; it should not simply rubber-stamp repeated remand requests.
2. Set out the structure and evidence you would present in support of the bail application, and address the prosecution’s objections.
Read the worked answer
Structure: (1) file a formal bail application supported by affidavit, attaching receipts, medical evidence of pregnancy and two surety declarations; (2) show fixed abode, family ties, no previous convictions and willingness to surrender a passport or report to police; (3) propose strict conditions, including two sureties in a stated sum, reporting weekly, no contact with prosecution witnesses and a prohibition on leaving Greater Accra; (4) call evidence or produce documents showing the trial will not be ready soon.
Answer the prosecution’s objections: ‘ongoing investigations’ is not a concrete risk; ask what specific step remains and why four weeks have produced no statements; offer not to contact the mobile-money vendor; point out that the cutlass has not been linked to Ama; emphasise presumption of innocence and the health risks of custodial remand. If the court is minded to refuse, ask for a short adjournment rather than another two-week remand and ask the court to record reasons.
3. If the District Court refuses bail and continues to remand, what lawful steps are open to Ama? Discuss the limits of those steps.
Read the worked answer
Steps: (a) renew the bail application if there is a change of circumstances, such as delay, ill-health or the completion of investigations; (b) apply to the High Court for bail, supporting the application with the District Court record and the delay; (c) in an appropriate case, seek the High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction or an order under Article 33 for breach of the reasonable-time guarantee in Article 19(2)(g); (d) consider habeas corpus only if the detention has no lawful remand order or the order has expired.
Limits: a High Court is not hearing an appeal against every refusal; it exercises an independent discretion. Repeated applications without new material can be dismissed as abuse of process. A remand order is lawful until set aside, so habeas corpus is not a cure for slow prosecution. The strongest remedy is a documented bail application plus a demand for case-management directions and service of statements.