GitLab Git Associate study materials
GitLab Git Associate study resources

GitLab Git Associate case studies

GitLab Git Associate · Put your knowledge to work in context.

The GitLab Git Associate credential is listed in this study profile as a certification focused on practical Git usage inside GitLab-based teams. It is aimed at developers, DevOps engineers, and release or platform staff who already work with repositories daily and want their branching, history, and review habits validated against a structured standard. The profile divides coverage evenly across four areas: Git fundamentals such as repositories, commits, branching, and merging; remote collaboration including remotes, fetching, pulling, pushing, and merge requests; history and inspection work with log, diff, blame, tags, revert, and reset; and GitLab workflow and branching strategies covering forks, protected branches, and code review. Because the profile lists no confirmed exam format, question count, duration, passing score, fee, retake policy, or validity period, candidates should treat all of those as unverified and confirm them directly with GitLab before booking. The GitLab Git Associate case studies are 5 cases and about 3,899 words.

1

Conflicted merge after a directory rename on a shared feature branch

A team of five is two days from a release. feature/payments was cut from main six weeks ago and now has 11 commits.

770 words, about 4 min
2

Push rejected and a polluted fork main under a fork-and-MR policy

Alice maintains a fork, alice/api , of group/api . She fetched upstream but then made two feature commits directly on her local main .

739 words, about 4 min
3

Finding a deleted cache key between two release tags

An e-commerce Rails app's p95 latency doubled after the v2.4.0 release. The setting cache.ttl existed in config/cache.yml at tag v2.3.0 but is absent at v2.4.0.

792 words, about 4 min
4

Fork merge request missing the parent project's integration pipeline

group/api has main protected with allowed-to-merge Maintainers, allowed-to-push No one, two required approvals, and 'Pipelines must succeed'. Developers have the Developer role.

807 words, about 4 min
5

Force-push during active review on a 40-file merge request

A 40-file MR in group/web has 18 review threads and two required approvals. The author rebases onto main to clear conflicts and force-pushes while three reviewers are mid-review.

791 words, about 4 min