GMAT Exam (Focus Edition) flashcards
GMAT Exam (Focus Edition) · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Harmonic mean speed
- For a trip covering equal distances at speeds a and b, average speed is 2ab/(a+b), not the arithmetic mean (a+b)/2. This is the harmonic mean of the two speeds.
- Weighted average formula
- Combined mean = (w1·x1 + w2·x2)/(w1 + w2). The result lies between the two group means and closer to the mean of the group with the larger weight.
- Combined work rate
- If worker A finishes a job in a hours and worker B in b hours, their combined rate is 1/a + 1/b and the time together is ab/(a+b) hours.
- Compound interest formula
- A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where P is principal, r the annual rate as a decimal, n the compounding periods per year, and t the number of years.
- Quadratic discriminant
- For ax² + bx + c = 0, the discriminant b² − 4ac determines the roots: positive gives two real roots, zero gives one repeated root, negative gives no real roots.
- Two-set union formula
- The number of elements in A or B equals |A| + |B| − |A ∩ B|. Subtracting the intersection avoids counting elements in both sets twice.
- Independent events probability
- For independent events A and B, P(A and B) = P(A)·P(B). For any two events, P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) − P(A and B).
- Inequality sign reversal
- Multiplying or dividing both sides of an inequality by a negative number reverses the direction of the inequality sign; adding or subtracting does not.
- Conclusion versus premise
- In a Critical Reasoning argument, the conclusion is the claim the author wants accepted; premises are the evidence offered to support it. Identify the conclusion first.
- Necessary assumption
- A statement that must be true for the argument's conclusion to follow. Negating it destroys the argument, which is the standard test for a necessary assumption.
- Sufficient assumption
- A statement that, if added to the premises, guarantees the conclusion. It need not be required by the argument; it only needs to make the conclusion follow.
- Weaken the argument
- The correct answer typically attacks the unstated assumption linking evidence to conclusion, for example by offering an alternative explanation or showing the evidence is unrepresentative.
- Strengthen the argument
- The correct answer confirms the assumption connecting evidence to conclusion, for example by ruling out an alternative cause or showing the sample is representative.
- Main idea question
- Asks for the passage's central claim. The correct answer must cover the whole passage, not one paragraph or a supporting detail, and must match the author's scope.
- Inference question
- Asks what must be true based on the passage. The answer is supported by the text but not explicitly stated; choices with extreme language are usually incorrect.
- EXCEPT question
- Four answer choices are supported by the passage and one is not. The task is to find the exception, so eliminate the four supported choices to isolate the answer.
- Scope shift
- A common wrong-answer pattern in which the choice discusses a topic, group, or time period the passage does not address, making the choice irrelevant to the argument.
- Author's attitude
- The author's stance toward the subject, such as supportive, critical, or neutral. Distinguish the author's view from views the author reports or criticizes in the passage.
- Data Sufficiency task
- Decide whether the two statements provide enough information to answer the question, not what the numerical answer is. The five answer choices are fixed and ordered.
- Data Sufficiency choice order
- Statement 1 alone; statement 2 alone; both together but neither alone; either alone; together still insufficient. Memorize this order because the choices never change.
- Testing insufficiency
- To show a statement is insufficient, find two different values that satisfy all given constraints but produce different answers to the question. One such pair proves insufficiency.
- Multi-Source Reasoning
- Questions draw on information spread across multiple tabs. For each answer choice, identify which tab supplies the relevant fact before judging whether the choice is supported.
- Table Analysis sorting
- Tables can be sorted and filtered by column. Check whether a percentage refers to the whole table or to a subgroup, since sorting changes which rows are visible.
- Graphics Interpretation axes
- Read axis labels, units, and scales before interpreting a trend. A line can reverse direction within the plotted range, so check the full range, not just the endpoints.
- Two-Part Analysis
- Two columns must each be answered, and the two correct answers must jointly satisfy the stated relationship. Evaluate each column independently against the constraints.
- Percentage change
- Percentage change = (new − old)/old × 100. A 20% decrease followed by a 20% increase yields a net 4% decrease, not zero change.
- Data Sufficiency with variables
- When a question asks for a value, a statement that yields a unique value is sufficient; one that yields multiple possible values is insufficient, even if the values are related.
- Yes/no Data Sufficiency
- For yes/no questions, a statement is sufficient if it always yields the same answer, whether yes or no. A definite no is sufficient; a sometimes-yes-sometimes-no is not.
- Table Analysis percentages
- Distinguish row percentages from column percentages. A percentage of a subgroup is not comparable to a percentage of the total unless the subgroup sizes are known.
- Graphics Interpretation units
- Check whether axis values are in thousands, millions, or percentages, and whether the vertical axis starts at zero. Truncated axes exaggerate apparent differences.
- Two-Part relationship constraint
- The two selected answers must satisfy any equation or condition stated in the prompt, such as one value being twice the other or their sum equaling a given total.
- Multi-Source conflicting data
- When tabs present data from different periods or sources, check whether they are directly comparable. A choice that mixes incompatible sources is usually incorrect.