PEGP Exam study materials
PEGP Exam study resources

PEGP Exam study plan

PEGP Exam · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Pharmaceutical Engineering Fundamentals

  • Define and contrast the core pharmaceutical engineering quantities - mass, energy, and momentum balances - and explain how each balance is applied to a stirred-tank reactor and a drying operation.

  • Derive dimensionless groups (Reynolds, Nusselt, Prandtl, Schmidt) and state the transport regime each group characterizes in mixing, heat transfer, and mass transfer.

  • Compute mixing time, power number, and impeller power draw for a given tank geometry using standard correlations, and identify which variables dominate the result.

  • Explain particle-size reduction and size-classification principles, including the equipment families used for milling, sieving, and air classification, and the material properties that govern their selection.

Your checkpoint

A one-page formula sheet with 15 dimensionless groups and unit-consistent worked calculations for power draw and mixing time in a 2,000 L tank.

Week 2

Pharmaceutical Engineering Fundamentals & Unit Operations and Equipment Design

  • Solve fluid-flow and pressure-drop problems through packed beds, filter media, and piping networks using Darcy, Ergun, and friction-factor relationships.

  • Distinguish the heat-transfer mechanisms in jacketed vessels, shell-and-tube exchangers, and freeze-dryer shelves, and calculate overall heat-transfer coefficients from film and wall resistances.

  • Analyze drying and evaporation operations by constructing a moisture-content versus drying-time curve and identifying the constant-rate and falling-rate periods.

  • Explain the working principles of the major unit operations (granulation, drying, milling, blending, compression, filtration, chromatography, lyophilization) and match each to its governing rate-limiting mechanism.

Your checkpoint

A written comparison of three candidate dryer types for a heat-sensitive product, with calculated drying times and a justified recommendation.

Week 3

Process Development and Scale-Up

  • Apply the scale-up criteria - constant tip speed, constant power per unit volume, constant Reynolds number, and constant mixing time - and predict which quality attribute shifts when each criterion is held constant.

  • Construct a scale-up protocol from a 5 L bench reactor to a 2,000 L production reactor, specifying the geometric similarity assumptions and the parameters that must be verified at each step.

  • Interpret design-of-experiments output (main effects, interactions, response surfaces) and select operating ranges that define a design space for a critical process parameter.

  • Identify process risk using failure mode and effects analysis and rank parameters by severity, occurrence, and detectability to prioritize development effort.

Your checkpoint

A scale-up report with a parameter table comparing bench, pilot, and production scales, plus a DoE-based design space for one critical process parameter.

Week 4

Unit Operations and Equipment Design & Process Development and Scale-Up

  • Specify equipment design requirements for a given process, including materials of construction, surface finish, cleanability, and drainability, and justify each choice against product contact risk.

  • Evaluate equipment capacity and throughput by calculating batch cycle time, utilization, and bottleneck location for a multi-step process train.

  • Explain the design and operating principles of clean-in-place and steam-in-place systems, including coverage verification, flow velocity, and temperature requirements.

  • Select and size a filtration or chromatography step to meet a specified impurity clearance target, showing the calculation basis.

Your checkpoint

An equipment specification sheet for one unit operation covering materials, surface finish, utilities, capacity, cleaning method, and acceptance criteria.

Week 5

Quality Assurance and Regulatory Compliance

  • Map the regulatory framework - ICH quality guidelines, regional submission pathways, and pharmacopoeial requirements - to the lifecycle stages of a pharmaceutical product.

  • Write a specification and acceptance criteria for a drug substance and drug product, distinguishing critical quality attributes from non-critical attributes and justifying each limit.

  • Apply ICH stability guidance to design a stability study, including batch selection, storage conditions, testing intervals, and shelf-life extrapolation rules.

  • Explain change control and post-approval variation categories, and determine the reporting category for three representative changes.

  • Interpret an out-of-specification investigation flow and distinguish laboratory error, assignable cause, and true product failure.

Your checkpoint

A mock regulatory dossier section containing a specification table, stability protocol, and a change-control assessment for two proposed changes.

Week 6

Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) & Validation and Qualification

  • Explain GMP requirements for personnel, premises, documentation, and material control, and identify the specific failure each requirement is designed to prevent.

  • Distinguish validation, qualification, and verification; write a validation master plan outline and a user requirement specification for a new piece of equipment.

  • Design an installation, operational, and performance qualification protocol, selecting the worst case and defining acceptance criteria for each stage.

  • Explain process validation in the lifecycle model, including continued process verification and the statistical tools used to detect drift.

  • Apply data-integrity principles (ALCOA+) to a documentation scenario and identify each violation present.

Your checkpoint

A complete IQ/OQ/PQ protocol outline for a piece of process equipment, including test cases, acceptance criteria, and a deviation-handling section.

Week 7

Safety, Health, and Environmental Management & Quality Assurance and Regulatory Compliance

  • Conduct a hazard identification and risk assessment for a process involving a flammable solvent, applying the hierarchy of controls to each identified hazard.

  • Explain the principles of dust and vapor explosion protection, including zoning, ignition-source control, and inerting, and select appropriate equipment for a classified area.

  • Interpret environmental requirements for pharmaceutical operations - effluent limits, solvent recovery, and waste classification - and describe how each is monitored.

  • Describe occupational exposure control strategies, including containment levels, airborne concentration monitoring, and the use of occupational exposure limits.

  • Explain the elements of an emergency response plan for a chemical release and the reporting obligations that follow.

Your checkpoint

A risk assessment register for a solvent-handling process with 10 identified hazards, assigned risk ratings, and specified controls.

Week 8

Pharmaceutical Engineering Fundamentals & Process Development and Scale-Up & Unit Operations and Equipment Design & Quality Assurance and Regulatory Compliance & Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) & Validation and Qualification & Safety, Health, and Environmental Management

  • Synthesize the seven domains into an integrated process description that traces one product from raw material to release, naming the governing requirement at each step.

  • Diagnose weak areas using a timed 60-question mixed-domain practice set and categorize every missed question by domain and by error type.

  • Re-derive the 20 highest-yield calculations from memory, including scale-up ratios, drying time, pressure drop, and overall heat-transfer coefficient.

  • Explain the ten most commonly confused concept pairs (validation versus qualification, critical process parameter versus critical quality attribute, deviation versus nonconformance) in your own words.

Your checkpoint

A timed mixed-domain practice exam scored by domain, with a written remediation list of the five weakest topics and a study action for each.

Milestones

Week 2: Score at least 75% on a 25-question self-test drawn only from Domains 1 and 3, and correctly complete all calculation items on the formula sheet without notes.

Week 4: Produce a scale-up report and equipment specification that a peer can follow without clarification, and correctly predict the direction of quality-attribute change under two different scale-up criteria.

Week 6: Score at least 80% on a 40-question mixed set covering Domains 4, 5, and 6, and pass a self-graded documentation review exercise with no missed data-integrity violations.

Week 8: Score at least 80% overall on the timed 60-question mixed-domain practice exam with no single domain below 70%, and have a written remediation plan for every domain below 80%.