HACCP study materials
HACCP study resources

HACCP flashcards

HACCP · Build recall with a focused review session.

32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.

HACCP seven principles
1) hazard analysis; 2) determine CCPs; 3) establish critical limits; 4) establish monitoring; 5) establish corrective actions; 6) establish verification procedures; 7) establish documentation and recordkeeping.
Prerequisite program (PRP)
Basic environmental and operational conditions, control measures and activities needed to maintain a hygienic food production environment; the foundation on which a HACCP plan is built.
SSOP
Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures: written, step-by-step procedures for daily cleaning and sanitation tasks, specifying frequency, chemicals and concentrations, responsible person, and verification of cleaning effectiveness.
GMP
Good Manufacturing Practices: regulations and practices covering buildings, equipment, personnel, training and operations that prevent contamination, functioning as a prerequisite program supporting HACCP.
Codex 12 HACCP steps
Five preliminary tasks (assemble the team, describe the product, identify intended use, construct the flow diagram, verify the diagram on site) followed by the seven HACCP principles.
Product description
Documented details of the food: composition, processing method, packaging, storage and distribution conditions, shelf life, and intended use, used to structure the hazard analysis.
Process flow diagram
A block diagram of every step from receiving through distribution; it must be verified on site against actual operations and is used to conduct the hazard analysis.
Hazard analysis
Systematic identification of biological, chemical and physical hazards and evaluation of their significance at each process step, producing a documented rationale for each control measure.
Risk vs hazard
A hazard is a potential source of harm; risk is the probability of that harm occurring together with its severity. Risk ranking is used to prioritize hazards during analysis.
Significant hazard
A hazard reasonably likely to occur at an unacceptable level and to cause illness or injury, established through documented justification rather than hypothetical possibility.
Chemical hazard examples
Unapproved pesticides, cleaning chemicals, undeclared allergens, mycotoxins, veterinary drug residues, heavy metals, packaging migrants, and process-induced chemicals such as acrylamide or histamine.
Biological hazard sources
Raw materials, water, ice, air, equipment surfaces, personnel, pests and cross-contamination pathways; pathogens may be introduced, survive or multiply at any step of the process.
Susceptible population
Groups with heightened risk or severity of foodborne illness, such as infants, young children, elderly people, pregnant women and immunocompromised individuals, considered when judging hazard significance.
Critical control point
A step or point at which control can be applied and is essential to prevent, eliminate, or reduce a significant hazard to an acceptable level.
CCP decision tree
A structured series of questions applied at each process step during the hazard analysis to determine whether that step should be designated a critical control point.
Critical limit
A measurable value such as temperature, time, pH, water activity or moisture that separates acceptability from unacceptability at a CCP; it must be objective and validated.
Operating limit
A more stringent target than the critical limit, used to provide a safety margin and trigger process adjustment before a deviation from the critical limit occurs.
Pasteurization critical limit
A validated time-temperature combination, such as 72 degrees Celsius for at least 15 seconds or a demonstrated equivalent lethality, that reduces target pathogens to acceptable levels in the product.
Water activity limit
A threshold such as water activity of 0.85 or below that restricts microbial growth and may serve as a critical limit for dry or shelf-stable foods when scientifically supported.
CCP monitoring interval
Continuous instruments record every unit, but operators must still verify sensor readouts at defined intervals against a calibrated reference device to confirm the instrument is accurate.
Monitoring
A preplanned sequence of measurements or observations at a CCP, performed by a named person at a stated frequency and recorded, to determine whether critical limits are met.
Deviation
Failure to meet a critical limit at a CCP; the affected product must be held and evaluated for safety, and a documented corrective action must be completed.
Corrective action
Documented action that regains control, identifies and eliminates the cause of a deviation, determines the disposition of affected product, and confirms the action was effective.
Product disposition
The decision made about product affected by a deviation: release with justification, rework, reprocess, divert to non-food use, or destroy, recorded with the supporting rationale.
Monitoring record content
Identifies the CCP, date and time, the measured value or observation, the equipment used, the person performing the check and a reviewer signature so results remain traceable.
Calibration
Comparison of an instrument's reading against a known reference standard; an out-of-calibration device invalidates monitoring data and requires product hold and safety evaluation.
Validation
Obtaining scientific and technical evidence before or during implementation that the control measures and critical limits, when properly applied, will effectively control the identified hazard.
Verification
Ongoing activities such as record review, calibration, audits and targeted testing that confirm the HACCP system operates as intended and reveal deviations requiring correction.
Reassessment
A scheduled or triggered re-evaluation of the HACCP plan following changes in product, process, equipment, packaging, raw materials or regulations, or new hazard information.
Record retention HACCP
Regulations set minimum retention periods, commonly two years or longer than the product shelf life; records must be dated, signed and kept in a retrievable location.
Independent record review
Verification of monitoring and corrective action records by a trained person other than the one who created them, at a defined frequency, confirming completeness and compliance.
Verification frequency
Set by product risk, process complexity and regulatory requirements; commonly record review each shift or batch, with full plan reassessment at least annually.