Discharge home to a fifth-floor walk-up after hip surgery
Mrs Wong, 78, is admitted after a fall at home resulting in a fractured neck of femur. She has had surgery and is medically stable for discharge on day 10. She lives alone on the fifth floor of a walk-up building in Sham Shui Po with no lift. She uses a walking frame and has mild knee osteoarthritis. Her son visits twice a week and wants her to move to a residential care home; Mrs Wong insists on going home to care for her 20-year-old cat and 'not be locked up'. The occupational therapist notes she cannot manage stairs or bathing safely; the medical social worker has one week to arrange discharge. She has savings but no private insurance; her son says he cannot afford to reduce work hours. Community services include an Enhanced Home and Community Care Service, home modification grants, a district elderly community centre, and a meals-on-wheels service with a waiting list.
1. Apply the social model of disability and a strengths-based assessment to Mrs Wong's situation. Identify the main barriers and strengths, and explain why a purely medical risk assessment is insufficient.
Read the worked answer
Social model of disability The social model locates disability in the interaction between impairment and environment, not in the person alone. Mrs Wong has a healing hip fracture and knee osteoarthritis, but her main disabling barriers are environmental and service-related:
- Five flights of stairs with no lift.
- A bathroom that she cannot use safely.
- A meals service with a waiting list.
- A son whose work limits his availability.
- A discharge timetable of one week that may not match housing adaptations.
A purely medical assessment would record 'falls risk, needs supervision' and conclude that residential care is the only safe option. That would miss the possibility of changing the environment, increasing home support, or using a short-term rehabilitation bed.
Strengths-based assessment
- Motivation: She wants to go home and has a meaningful reason - caring for her cat.
- Financial resources: She has savings, which may pay for private home care or modifications while a grant is processed.
- Family: Her son visits twice a week; the relationship is strained but present.
- Community: A district elderly centre and EHCCS exist nearby.
- Personal strengths: She can express her wishes clearly and has survived surgery.
Implication The assessment should ask what Mrs Wong wants, what she can do, and what would need to change for her to go home safely. That does not ignore risk; it makes the risk assessment more complete and identifies modifiable factors.
2. Propose a discharge plan that respects Mrs Wong's autonomy while managing risk. Name specific services, a contingency plan, and what you would say to the son.
Read the worked answer
Discharge plan
- Home trial with support: Arrange EHCCS for personal care, bathing assistance and medication prompting, initially twice daily. Confirm the start date before discharge; if unavailable, consider a short interim rehabilitation bed rather than an unsafe discharge.
- Home assessment and modifications: OT home visit before discharge; priority grab rails, a shower chair, a raised toilet seat and safe lighting. Apply for a home modification grant and use savings if the wait is long.
- Mobility and falls prevention: Physiotherapy for stair practice and a walking frame; a personal emergency alarm; a clear plan for what to do after a fall.
- Nutrition and social contact: Meals-on-wheels waiting list plus interim frozen meals; day care at the district elderly centre; a volunteer befriender if available.
- Cat care: Explore a neighbour or volunteer scheme so the cat is not a barrier to safe discharge.
- Medical follow-up: GP review, wound check and medication review; a named contact number.
Contingency plan If Mrs Wong has a second fall, cannot manage stairs, or EHCCS withdraws, the team will reconvene within 48 hours. Options include increased home care, respite care, or a time-limited trial in residential care. Residential care is a backup, not a punishment.
What I would say to the son 'I understand you are worried and cannot reduce your work hours. Your mother is clear that she wants to try home first. We will put in support and a written plan, and we will review it after two weeks. If it does not work, we will not leave her unsafe. Can you help with the reviews and emergency contact?'
This respects autonomy while making the risk explicit and shared.
3. If Mrs Wong falls again in the first week home, how should the team respond, and what does this show about the limits of discharge planning?
Read the worked answer
Immediate response
- Ensure medical assessment: check for fracture, head injury, pain and dehydration; do not assume the fall is a failure of the plan.
- Ask Mrs Wong what happened and what she wants. A fall does not automatically mean she lacks capacity to decide about her care.
- Convene the multidisciplinary team, including EHCCS, OT, medical social worker and the son, within 48 hours.
- Review the plan: Was the home care actually delivered? Were modifications in place? Was she rushing to the bathroom? Was the cat a tripping hazard? Was medication contributing?
- Increase support or arrange respite care if risk remains high. If repeated serious falls occur and she cannot remain safe, consider a best-interests meeting about residential care, but involve her and document her views.
What this shows about limits Discharge planning is a prediction, not a guarantee. It cannot control unpredictable events, service waiting lists, family availability or the physical environment. A one-week timetable is especially tight for housing modifications. The fall shows why contingency planning and review are part of good discharge planning, not evidence that home care was wrong.
Ethical point The team should avoid two errors: reflexive institutionalisation after one fall, and denial of risk to preserve a successful discharge statistic. The right response is a reassessment with Mrs Wong, not blame. If the fall was caused by a missed service, the team should fix the service gap; if it was caused by an unmodifiable environmental hazard, the team should discuss alternatives honestly.