写作第二部分：四个指定词写成80字短文
Mei leaves 22 minutes for the two Writing Part 2 items and must write about 80 characters each. Item 1 supplies four words: 暑假、计划、结果、收获. She begins 这个暑假让我明白了一个道理，计划虽然重要，但是结果更重要…… and reaches 120 characters without describing a single event, because she believes abstract sentences carry fewer grammar risks. Her teacher marks it down for 内容 and notes that two of the four words appear only as labels. On Item 2 she has 4 minutes left and writes 45 characters. She needs a structure she can execute in 10 minutes without inventing complex grammar.
1. Give Mei a six-sentence plan plus a sample text of 80–95 characters that uses all four words and contains at least one concrete event.
Read the worked answer
Six-sentence plan: time and intention → obstacle → result → one concrete detail → gain → one short reflection.
Sample (about 86 characters):
今年暑假我本来计划去打工，结果因为家里有事，只好留在城里。虽然没有挣到钱，但我学会了做饭，还每天陪奶奶去买菜。这个暑假的收获，比我想的多。现在我知道，计划变了并不可怕，重要的是别让时间白白过去。
Why it works:
- 暑假 = the time setting, used twice, naturally.
- 计划 = her intention (去打工), in a 本来…结果 frame that makes the word do grammatical work.
- 结果 = the turn of events, not a label.
- 收获 = the change in her, stated in one clause rather than a paragraph of reflection.
- Concrete detail: 学会了做饭 and 陪奶奶去买菜 - these carry the 内容 score and are built from A2-level grammar, so the added content costs no accuracy risk.
- Length: 86 characters sits comfortably inside 80–95, leaving margin if she adds a comma clause while checking.
2. Explain why her abstract opening loses marks even when the grammar is correct, and how the four given words should function in the text.
Read the worked answer
Why abstract openings lose marks:
- 内容 is a scored category. A sentence like 计划虽然重要，但是结果更重要 is a general opinion that could be attached to any prompt - the rater cannot tell whether she understood the four words or merely inserted them. Words used as labels do not demonstrate comprehension.
- Abstract evaluation sentences invite errors, not avoid them. 虽然…但是…更重要 stacks three abstract nouns and a comparison; the grammar is riskier than 我学会了做饭, and if it slips, both 语法 and 连贯 are hit.
- Repetition inflates length without adding information. She reaches 120 characters but the last 40 are restatements, which is visible to a rater and can read as padding.
How each word should function - every given word must be attached to a concrete person, time or action:
- 暑假 → when it happened (今年暑假).
- 计划 → what she intended to do (本来计划去打工).
- 结果 → what actually happened instead (结果因为家里有事).
- 收获 → what changed for her (学会了做饭).
Rule of thumb: if a given word could be deleted and the sentence would still mean the same thing, it is a label, and it is not earning marks.
3. Allocate her 22 minutes across the two items and say what she should do if the first draft reaches only 60 characters.
Read the worked answer
Allocation: 11 minutes per item, with a fixed internal clock.
- 2 min - plan. Write the four given words in a column and beside each one a concrete fact from her own life. If she cannot fill a row, choose a different real event, not a more abstract sentence.
- 6 min - draft the six sentences in order. Do not polish during drafting; the plan already fixes the order.
- 2 min - check four things only: 字数 (80–95), all four words present and doing a job, 了/过 placement, punctuation and paragraph break.
- 1 min - buffer carried to item 2.
If the draft is only 60 characters at the six-minute mark: do not add adjectives or a moral conclusion - that repeats the original error. Add one sentence of concrete detail answering who / what / when, for example:
有一天奶奶忘了带钥匙，我在楼下等了她一个小时。
That is about 24 characters, uses only familiar grammar, and raises 内容 and 字数 at the same time. Then re-check that the 收获 sentence still follows logically from the new detail, since a detail dropped in at the end can break 连贯 if it is not connected to the gain.