Organic Traffic Is Up but Contacts Are Down
Greenfield Supply sells commercial HVAC parts. In Q2, organic search sessions rose 38% quarter over quarter, average session duration rose from 1:12 to 1:48, and bounce rate fell from 62% to 47%. At the same time, new contacts created from organic search fell 22%, and demo requests from organic landing pages fell 15%. Traffic analytics shows one blog post about refrigerant regulations generated 41,000 sessions, mostly from mobile users in states where Greenfield does not sell. The paid search team uses inconsistent UTM parameters: some campaigns use “utm_source=google” and others “utm_source=Google Ads.” The website has 14 landing pages, four with exit rates above 80%. Marketing wants to know whether SEO is working and what to fix first.
1. Is SEO working? Analyze the metric pattern and identify the most likely explanations before recommending action.
Read the worked answer
SEO is producing traffic, but the pattern does not show that it is producing qualified demand. The headline metrics are moving in opposite directions: sessions up 38%, duration up, bounce down, but contacts down 22% and demo requests down 15%. That combination suggests a change in traffic mix rather than a sudden improvement in conversion.
The 41,000-session blog post is the first suspect. It is informational, mobile-heavy, and concentrated in states where Greenfield does not sell. Informational readers often stay longer and bounce less because they are reading a long regulation explainer, not because they are shopping. A single viral post can lift average duration and lower bounce rate while diluting the session-to-contact rate. That is a quality problem, not necessarily an SEO failure.
Before changing SEO strategy, I would segment the organic traffic by landing page, device, state, and query theme. Compare sessions, form submissions, and new contacts for the blog post versus commercial pages. Check whether the contact source property is being set correctly and whether demo form tracking broke during the quarter. Also compare “new contacts from organic” against “contacts with an organic first touch,” because last-touch source reporting can shift when paid campaigns change. The immediate conclusion is that traffic growth is real but not yet business growth; the next step is a conversion-quality analysis by page and geography.
2. Design a tracking and reporting plan to fix the UTM inconsistency and measure organic and paid performance.
Read the worked answer
I would separate tracking hygiene from performance reporting.
Tracking hygiene: publish a UTM standard: lowercase source, medium, and campaign; no spaces; a fixed list of source values, for example google, linkedin, bing; and medium values such as cpc, organic, email. Replace Google Ads with google so paid search does not split into two sources. Require UTMs on every paid ad, email, and partner link, and use HubSpot’s tracking URL builder so the team does not invent variants. Run a monthly audit of the top 20 sources and merge or fix inconsistent values. Also verify that the HubSpot ads integration is connected so Google and LinkedIn spend and clicks are not manually entered.
Reporting: build three views. First, a traffic analytics view by source and medium, with sessions, contacts created, and session-to-contact rate; do not rank channels by sessions alone. Second, a landing-page report showing sessions, form submissions, conversion rate, and CTA clicks for the 14 pages. Third, an attribution view for first touch and last touch so the team can see the difference between demand creation and conversion. Add a dashboard card for “organic contacts by commercial landing page” to separate the viral blog post from product pages. Define organic as a source, not a campaign, and document the date property used for contacts.
3. Which four landing pages would you fix first, and what reports would prove improvement?
Read the worked answer
I would not fix the four highest-exit pages automatically. Exit rate alone can be high on a page that is supposed to be the last step, such as a demo confirmation or a support page. I would rank pages by material traffic × below-benchmark conversion × commercial intent.
Priority logic:
- Pages with meaningful organic sessions and a low session-to-form-submission rate.
- Pages with high exit rate and high sessions, especially commercial product or demo pages.
- Pages where mobile conversion is much worse than desktop, since the viral post is mobile-heavy.
- Pages with inconsistent UTM traffic that may be masking the real source.
The four pages should therefore be selected from the commercial landing pages, not the regulation blog post, unless the blog post has a clear next step and a measurable CTA. Fixes might include a shorter form, a mobile sticky CTA, clearer product availability by state, and a “request a quote” path instead of a generic demo.
To prove improvement, build a landing-page report with sessions, CTA clicks, form submissions, new contacts, and conversion rate by page and device. Compare a four-week pre-period with a four-week post-period, and use a control page that was not changed. Also report contacts from organic by landing page, not just sessions. If the page is informational, measure assisted conversions or demo requests that include the page in the journey, because a blog post will rarely be the last touch.