IAAI-CFI study plan
IAAI-CFI · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Fire Investigation Job Performance Requirements (NFPA 1033)
Map the full NFPA 1033 scope against the IAAI-CFI task domains and list every job performance requirement you must be able to demonstrate
Define the CFI role boundaries, the origin-and-cause investigator's ethical duties, and the difference between the public and private investigator's authority
Assemble the core reference set (NFPA 921 current edition, NFPA 1033, applicable codes) and note which chapters feed each job performance requirement
Build a personal glossary of at least 40 fire-investigation terms with definitions you can state from memory
Your checkpoint
A one-page competency map listing each NFPA 1033 job performance requirement against your current confidence level (weak/moderate/strong)
Fire Investigation Job Performance Requirements (NFPA 1033)
Explain the scientific method as applied to fire investigation and identify where each step appears in a report
Distinguish hypothesis formation from hypothesis testing and describe how to falsify a fire-cause hypothesis
Identify the systematic approach stages: data collection, analysis, hypothesis development, testing, and conclusion
Compare the burden of proof and evidentiary standards that apply to fire-cause determinations
Your checkpoint
A written worked example (600+ words) taking a hypothetical room fire from data collection to a tested origin-and-cause conclusion, explicitly labeling each scientific-method step
Fire Investigation Job Performance Requirements (NFPA 1033)
Describe the fire dynamics fundamentals needed to interpret burn patterns: ignition, flame spread, heat release, ventilation, and compartment fire stages
Explain how ventilation, fuel load, and compartment geometry alter burn patterns and confuse origin interpretation
Differentiate char patterns, heat lines, and smoke deposition from indicators of ignitable liquid involvement
Identify the limits of pattern interpretation and when physical evidence testing is required
Your checkpoint
A comparative table of at least 10 burn-pattern types with the fire condition that produces each and one misinterpretation risk per pattern
Fire Investigation Job Performance Requirements (NFPA 1033)
Execute the origin-determination workflow: exterior survey, interior survey, and systematic elimination of all possible origins
Apply the concept of the area of origin versus the point of origin and document how each is narrowed
Identify the role of fire patterns, witness data, and fire modeling in validating an origin hypothesis
Recognize when an origin cannot be determined and how to document that conclusion defensibly
Your checkpoint
A mock scene narrative that walks through exterior and interior survey, eliminates at least three candidate origins, and lands on a documented point of origin
Fire Investigation Job Performance Requirements (NFPA 1033)
Explain cause classification categories and the criteria separating accidental, natural, incendiary, and undetermined causes
Describe how each cause classification must be supported by evidence rather than by absence of an accidental explanation
Identify the elements investigators must evaluate for incendiary cause, including the presence of an ignition source and a competent ignition sequence
List the documentation required when a cause is classified as undetermined
Your checkpoint
A decision checklist that maps evidence to each cause classification and flags the minimum evidence threshold for an incendiary finding
Fire Investigation Job Performance Requirements (NFPA 1033)
Describe scene safety responsibilities, including structural, electrical, chemical, and environmental hazards, and the authority to stop work
Explain evidence identification, documentation, packaging, chain of custody, and spoliation-avoidance practices
Identify the legal considerations for scene entry, consent, warrants, and the private investigator's limits
Outline the components of a complete fire investigation report and the criteria for a defensible conclusion
Your checkpoint
A sample evidence log and chain-of-custody form plus a report outline covering all required sections, each with a one-line content standard
Fire Investigation Job Performance Requirements (NFPA 1033)
Explain the role of laboratory analysis, fire testing, and expert consultation in supporting or refuting a cause hypothesis
Describe how to evaluate and rely on fire modeling, reconstruction, and simulation outputs without overstating certainty
Identify common cognitive biases and how to counter them during cause determination
Prepare to defend a cause conclusion under cross-examination, distinguishing fact, inference, and opinion
Your checkpoint
A cross-examination question set of 20 questions with your prepared answers, including three questions that challenge the reliability of your methodology
Fire Investigation Job Performance Requirements (NFPA 1033)
Integrate all job performance requirements into a single end-to-end case file from scene to conclusion
Identify and close remaining weak areas from the week 1 competency map
Rehearse explaining the scientific method, origin determination, and cause classification aloud within time limits
Verify currency of referenced standards and codes used in your notes
Your checkpoint
A complete mock case file (scene documentation, evidence log, origin analysis, cause determination, and final report) plus an updated competency map showing all requirements at moderate or strong
Milestones
Week 2: You can explain the scientific method and hypothesis testing in fire investigation without notes and apply it to a hypothetical fire
Week 4: You can perform a full origin-determination walkthrough, eliminating alternative origins with stated evidence for each elimination
Week 6: You can classify a cause into the correct category and justify it with evidence, and you can produce a complete report outline from memory
Week 8: All NFPA 1033 job performance requirements on your competency map are rated moderate or strong, and your mock case file passes a self-review for internal consistency