CFCE study plan
CFCE · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Storage Media, File Systems and Data Structures
Diagram the NTFS on-disk layout from boot sector through MFT, MFT mirror, cluster runs, and attribute headers, labeling every structure you can name from memory
Parse a raw $MFT record by hand (hex editor) and identify the signature, fixup array, sequence number, flags, and resident versus non-resident attribute headers
Compare FAT12/16/32, exFAT, and NTFS directory entry structures and explain how each stores file names, timestamps, and cluster allocation
Explain how file slack, unallocated space, and volume slack arise from cluster allocation and where each is likely to hold residual data
Your checkpoint
A one-page annotated NTFS layout diagram plus a hex-annotated screenshot of one manually parsed MFT record with each field labeled
Windows Artifact Analysis
Enumerate the Windows registry hives relevant to user activity (NTUSER.DAT, UsrClass.dat, SYSTEM, SOFTWARE, SAM, SECURITY) and state what each proves
Trace execution evidence across ShimCache, Amcache, Prefetch, UserAssist, and BAM/DAM, and explain the limits and reliability caveats of each
Interpret $StandardInformation versus $FileName timestamps and describe the timestamp-manipulation scenarios (timestomping) that create mismatches
Locate and interpret event log sources for logon, service installation, and USB connection activity, including relevant event IDs
Map LNK files, Jump Lists, Shellbags, and RecentDocs to specific user actions such as opening a file or browsing a folder
Your checkpoint
An artifact-to-question matrix spreadsheet listing at least 20 Windows artifacts with location, what it proves, known limitations, and the tool or method used to parse it
Windows Artifact Analysis & Deleted File Recovery and File Carving
Recover deleted NTFS files using both MFT-record analysis and $LogFile/$UsnJrnl review, and document why each recovery succeeded or failed
Carve files from unallocated space using signature-based and structure-based methods, and explain when each approach produces false positives
Distinguish deleted-file recovery from file carving and identify the file-system conditions that make each viable
Document a recovery attempt end to end with hashes, offsets, and a defensible statement of what the recovered data does and does not prove
Your checkpoint
A recovery lab report covering at least five deleted files (mixed NTFS and FAT) with method used, source offset, hash, and confidence rating for each
Forensic Imaging and Verification & Evidence Handling, Chain of Custody and Documentation
Compare logical, physical, and sparse imaging and select the correct method for a given scenario with justification
Compute and verify MD5 and SHA-256 hashes at acquisition and re-verification, and explain hash collisions and the limits of hash equality as proof of identity
Draft a chain-of-custody form that captures seizure, transfer, storage, and access events with the fields needed for admissibility
Write acquisition notes that record write-blocker model, tool and version, source geometry, errors encountered, and any deviation from procedure
Explain how to handle a drive that fails during imaging, including documentation of the failure and options for a second attempt
Your checkpoint
A complete mock acquisition packet: chain-of-custody form, acquisition log, hash verification output, and a short written justification for the imaging method chosen
Deleted File Recovery and File Carving & Network, Internet and Email Evidence
Extract and interpret browser history, cache, cookies, downloads, and bookmarks from at least two browser families and state what each record proves
Parse email headers to trace delivery path and identify spoofing indicators, and locate mail stores for at least one desktop and one webmail scenario
Analyze network evidence such as firewall logs, DHCP leases, and packet captures to place a device on a network at a given time
Explain how NAT, VPNs, and cloud sync complicate attribution of internet activity to a specific person
Carve deleted browser and email artifacts from unallocated space and validate the results against known-good records
Your checkpoint
A timeline of one simulated user's internet and email activity over 48 hours, built from at least three independent artifact sources with source citations for each entry
Forensic Readiness, Legal and Ethical Considerations & Mobile Device and Other Non-Traditional Media Forensics
Draft a forensic readiness assessment for an organization covering logging, retention, time synchronization, and evidence preservation gaps
Explain the legal and ethical boundaries on consent, scope of authorization, privacy, and handling of incidental findings, and apply them to two written scenarios
Describe acquisition and analysis approaches for mobile devices, including logical versus physical extraction, backups, and cloud-synced data
Identify challenges in non-traditional media such as SSDs (TRIM, wear leveling), cloud storage, IoT devices, and game consoles, and state what evidence may be unrecoverable
Apply order-of-volatility principles to a live-response scenario and justify what to collect first
Your checkpoint
A two-part written piece: a forensic readiness gap assessment for a fictional company and a 500-word analysis of two ethical/legal scenarios with cited reasoning
Reporting, Testimony and Peer Review & Forensic Tool Use, Validation and Quality Assurance
Structure a forensic report with scope, methodology, findings, limitations, and conclusions that withstand cross-examination
Write findings that separate observation from inference and state confidence levels explicitly
Prepare and rehearse direct-examination answers and anticipate cross-examination challenges to your methodology
Validate a forensic tool by documenting version, test data, known-answer results, and limitations, and explain why tool output alone is not proof
Describe peer review and quality-assurance practices, including what a reviewer checks and how discrepancies are resolved
Your checkpoint
A full mock forensic report on a prior lab exercise plus a one-page tool validation record for one tool you used
Evidence Handling, Chain of Custody and Documentation & Forensic Imaging and Verification & Storage Media, File Systems and Data Structures
Re-run a full end-to-end scenario from acquisition through reporting under time pressure and document every decision point
Audit your own prior deliverables against a checklist for chain-of-custody gaps, unhashed evidence, and unsupported conclusions, then correct them
Re-drill weak areas identified in earlier milestones using timed practice sets weighted to the heaviest domains
Summarize the ten domains' key facts into a single condensed reference sheet you can review in under 30 minutes
Your checkpoint
A completed end-to-end case file (acquisition packet, analysis notes, timeline, report) plus a corrected audit checklist showing every issue found and fixed
Milestones
Week 2: Without notes, name the location and evidentiary value of at least 15 Windows artifacts and correctly explain one timestomping detection method
Week 4: Produce a chain-of-custody form and acquisition log that a reviewer marks as complete with no missing fields, and verify hashes match on a re-check
Week 6: Score at least 75% on a self-made 40-question quiz drawn from domains 3, 5, and 6, and correctly justify three ethical/legal decisions in writing
Week 8: Complete the end-to-end case file within the time budget and pass your own audit checklist with zero unresolved evidence-handling defects