Motor Third-Party Reserve Review After Court Award Inflation
An Indian general insurer is valuing motor third-party (MTPL) liabilities at 31 March 2025. For accident year 2022, incurred claims are ₹420 crore at 12 months, ₹560 crore at 24 months and ₹640 crore at 36 months; paid claims at 36 months are ₹300 crore and case reserves are ₹180 crore. The chain-ladder link ratios are 1.33 and 1.14. The reserving team has raised the assumed claims inflation from 6% to 9% after several High Court awards, and three large claims are notified but not yet settled. The CFO notes the company's solvency ratio is 1.62 times the required margin and asks for a 5% release from the MTPL reserve to create 'headroom' for growth. The Appointed Actuary must sign the reserve opinion in six weeks, and the audit committee wants a clear explanation of uncertainty.
1. Assess whether the chain-ladder estimate is reliable and outline the adjustments you would make before signing the reserve opinion.
Read the worked answer
Diagnostics. The link ratios reproduce the reported incurred amounts almost exactly (420 × 1.33 ≈ 559; 560 × 1.14 ≈ 638), so the triangle is internally consistent but not necessarily adequate. At 36 months only ₹300 crore is paid against ₹640 crore incurred; the paid-to-incurred ratio of about 47% means the estimate depends heavily on case reserves and IBNR. A 9% inflation assumption versus historical 6% breaks the chain-ladder's stable-development assumption: past link ratios embed lower inflation and older court award patterns. Adjustments. Separate the three large claims and reserve them individually; test case-reserve adequacy; apply inflation-adjusted development factors or use a frequency-severity/Bornhuetter-Ferguson method with an expected loss ratio; add a tail for MTPL settlement delays. Present a range, not a single factor, and show sensitivity to inflation (for example ±2%) and to large-claim outcomes. Conclusion. Chain ladder is a useful starting point but not sufficient for sign-off; the indicated ultimate should be adjusted upward or a range adopted.
2. Draft the key points you would make to the CFO about the proposed 5% reserve release and its effect on solvency.
Read the worked answer
Key message. A reserve release is an accounting and actuarial conclusion, not a capital-management tool. The 5% release (about ₹32 crore on ₹640 crore incurred) is only supportable if the revised estimate is within a defensible range and the new inflation and large-claim evidence has been reflected. On the facts, inflation has risen and large claims are unresolved, so a release is difficult to justify. Solvency. At 1.62 times the required margin the insurer has headroom, but using reserve releases to create growth capital weakens the balance sheet and may be challenged by the regulator or auditor. Process. Ask the CFO for the evidence supporting the release; document the range and sensitivities; explain that the Appointed Actuary's opinion must be objective and not influenced by commercial targets. If the board still wants a lower estimate, record the disagreement and consider audit committee escalation. Communication. State the point estimate, range, key uncertainties and the effect on solvency, and avoid presenting a single best number without the range.