IAI SP7 study materials
IAI SP7 study resources

IAI SP7 study plan

IAI SP7 · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Reserving for general insurance liabilities (technical provisions, claims development, reserving methods and uncertainty)

  • Build cumulative paid and incurred claim triangles from a raw claims transaction table, and reconcile the two triangles to the general ledger totals.

  • Compute age-to-age development factors, select development patterns, and derive cumulative development factors and ultimate loss estimates using the basic chain ladder.

  • Diagnose the triangle for anomalies (negative increments, diagonal effects, large claims, changes in case reserving) and document the adjustment you would make and why.

  • Explain the assumptions underlying the chain ladder, including stable development, no calendar-year distortions, and proportionality of ultimates to reported claims, and state how you would test each one.

Your checkpoint

A chain ladder workbook (triangle, factors, ultimates) plus a 600-word diagnostic memo listing three data issues and the adjustments made, with numbers reconciled to a stated total.

Week 2

Reserving for general insurance liabilities (technical provisions, claims development, reserving methods and uncertainty)

  • Apply Bornhuetter-Ferguson and Cape Cod methods to the same triangle, using an independent expected loss ratio, and reconcile the differences against the chain ladder result.

  • Derive an expected loss ratio from exposure and pricing data, and test its sensitivity to a plus or minus 10% change in the prior.

  • Build a frequency-severity estimate from claim counts and average costs, and compare its implied ultimate with the development-based estimate.

  • Quantify the effect of discounting and unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE) on the carried reserve, and show the calculation explicitly.

Your checkpoint

A method comparison sheet showing chain ladder, Bornhuetter-Ferguson, Cape Cod, and frequency-severity ultimates, with a 500-word note selecting a best estimate and justifying the weights.

Week 3

Reserving for general insurance liabilities (technical provisions, claims development, reserving methods and uncertainty) & Capital assessment and solvency for general insurers (risk-based capital, internal models, risk appetite)

  • Compute the Mack chain ladder standard error and the coefficient of variation by accident year, and interpret the process versus parameter uncertainty components.

  • Run a bootstrap over-dispersed Poisson (ODP) simulation to produce a predictive distribution of reserves, and extract the 75th, 90th, and 99th percentiles.

  • Explain how reserve uncertainty and reserve run-off feed into capital requirements, including the treatment of one-year versus ultimate risk.

  • Draft a plain-language explanation of reserve risk for a non-actuarial board member, including why the mean and the 90th percentile differ.

Your checkpoint

An uncertainty note containing the Mack standard errors, bootstrap percentiles, and a 400-word board-ready explanation of reserve risk.

Week 4

Capital assessment and solvency for general insurers (risk-based capital, internal models, risk appetite)

  • Derive the solvency capital requirement for reserve and premium risk using a factor-based approach and a scenario-based approach, and compare the results.

  • Explain the aggregation of risk modules using correlations and copulas, and calculate the diversification benefit for a simple two-risk example.

  • Calibrate a stress scenario for a 1-in-200 adverse claims event and show its impact on the solvency ratio.

  • Outline the requirements for an internal model, including use test, statistical quality, calibration, and model governance.

Your checkpoint

A capital calculation pack showing factor-based and scenario-based SCRs, diversification benefit, and a stressed solvency ratio, with a one-page method summary.

Week 5

Capital assessment and solvency for general insurers (risk-based capital, internal models, risk appetite) & Reinsurance and its effect on reserves, capital and risk transfer

  • Define a risk appetite statement with quantitative tolerances for reserve adequacy, solvency ratio, and reinsurance recoverable concentration.

  • Model the effect of a quota share treaty and a surplus treaty on reserves, capital, and the solvency ratio, and identify the break-even cession level.

  • Model an excess-of-loss program with reinstatements, and calculate the net cost and capital relief for a chosen attachment and limit.

  • Assess whether a reinsurance arrangement achieves meaningful risk transfer, applying the tests for significant risk transfer and deposit accounting.

Your checkpoint

A reinsurance and risk appetite model comparing no reinsurance, quota share, and excess-of-loss, with a 500-word recommendation on the program and its capital impact.

Week 6

Reinsurance and its effect on reserves, capital and risk transfer

  • Calculate reinsurance recoverables on paid and incurred claims, and adjust the reserve for expected recoverable bad debt and credit risk.

  • Analyze the effect of reinsurance on reserve uncertainty, including the dependency between ceded and retained losses and the treatment of reinstatement costs.

  • Explain the accounting and reserving treatment of deposit or financing arrangements that do not transfer significant insurance risk.

  • Evaluate commutation and collateral arrangements, and quantify their effect on balance sheet and capital.

Your checkpoint

A reinsurance recoverable analysis with bad debt adjustment, a risk transfer conclusion for two sample treaties, and a 400-word note on balance sheet impact.

Week 7

Regulatory, reporting and professional context (supervisory requirements, actuarial standards, communication of results)

  • Map the applicable supervisory requirements for general insurance reserving and solvency, including valuation of technical provisions, admissible assets, and solvency margin reporting.

  • Draft the reserving and capital sections of a board report, including data limitations, method choices, key judgments, and sensitivities.

  • Apply relevant actuarial professional standards, including peer review, documentation, and communication of uncertainty, to a worked reserving case.

  • Prepare responses to three supervisory-style questions on reserve adequacy and capital, using evidence from your earlier work.

Your checkpoint

A mock board paper of 1,200 words covering reserves, capital, and reinsurance, with a documented peer-review checklist.

Week 8

Reserving for general insurance liabilities (technical provisions, claims development, reserving methods and uncertainty) & Capital assessment and solvency for general insurers (risk-based capital, internal models, risk appetite) & Reinsurance and its effect on reserves, capital and risk transfer & Regulatory, reporting and professional context (supervisory requirements, actuarial standards, communication of results)

  • Synthesize reserving, capital, reinsurance, and regulatory content into a single case study, and identify the interactions between them.

  • Complete a timed 3-hour mock examination under exam conditions using original practice questions.

  • Mark the mock against a structured mark scheme and list your three weakest syllabus areas with a remediation action for each.

  • Create a one-page formula and concept sheet covering development factors, Bornhuetter-Ferguson, Mack standard error, SCR aggregation, and risk transfer tests.

Your checkpoint

A completed timed mock with self-marked score, a remediation list, and a one-page formula sheet.

Milestones

Week 4: Complete a 45-minute closed-book test on reserving methods and capital calculation; score at least 60%, and explain Mack standard error and SCR aggregation without notes.

Week 6: Produce a 30-minute oral-style explanation (recorded or written) of how reinsurance affects reserves, capital, and risk transfer, using your week 5 and 6 models.

Week 8: Achieve at least 55% on the timed mock, with no domain scoring below 40%, and submit the remediation plan with dated actions.