Six Problem Cards from a Weekend Booking Cycle
A county jail submits 38 tenprint cards from a weekend booking cycle. Six are flagged by the quality reviewer:
- Card 12: the right ring finger block contains a print labelled 'AMP' with no amputation code and no date; the other nine prints are clear.
- Card 19: the left thumb and left index prints are rolled in the right thumb and right index blocks; the card is otherwise legible.
- Card 23: all four fingers of the right hand were taken as one simultaneous slap in the right four-finger block, and the individual finger blocks are blank.
- Card 27: the right middle finger print is heavily inked, with furrows filled and the delta obliterated.
- Card 31: the left little finger block is blank with 'unable to print' written, but no reason is given.
- Card 35: the card is clean, but the subject's name is spelled two different ways in the header and the signature block. The contributor wants all six accepted so the booking records can be closed before the weekend.
1. For each of the six cards, state whether you would accept with annotation, return for reprint, or treat as an administrative correction, and give the reason.
Read the worked answer
- Card 12: return for correction. 'AMP' alone does not identify the digit, the level of amputation, or whether it was acquired. Once the contributor supplies a proper code and date, the card can be accepted with annotation.
- Card 19: return for reprint. Finger misidentification cannot be fixed by relabelling, because the rolled prints may not be the digits claimed. Classification and AFIS depend on digit identity.
- Card 23: return for reprint. A four-finger slap is not a substitute for individual rolled impressions; the individual blocks are required.
- Card 27: return for reprint if the pattern cannot be classified because the delta is obliterated. If the delta and minutiæ are still clear enough to classify reliably, accept with annotation; here the stated condition points to reprint.
- Card 31: return for a reason and a second attempt. 'Unable to print' is acceptable only with the cause, such as injury, bandage, or physical condition.
- Card 35: administrative correction, not a print defect. Return it to the contributor to reconcile the name; if identity is uncertain, flag the record before acceptance.
2. Card 19 was produced by rolling the left thumb and left index into the right thumb and right index blocks. What identification risk does acceptance create, and what is the minimum correction?
Read the worked answer
The risk is digit misattribution. A latent from the left thumb would be searched or compared against the right thumb block, producing a false exclusion or a missed association. Because Henry classification uses digit-specific values, a transposed print also corrupts the classification and the filing sequence. In an AFIS tenprint search, the error can propagate into the candidate record and into any subsequent identification.
The minimum correction is to reprint both fingers into the correct blocks, verify digit identity against the slap impressions, annotate the correction, and have a second person check the digit assignment. Cutting and pasting images between blocks is not acceptable, because it preserves the possibility that the original rolled impressions were the wrong fingers.
3. What must a proper amputation annotation and an 'unable to print' annotation contain, and why is 'AMP' alone inadequate?
Read the worked answer
An amputation annotation should identify the digit, whether the amputation is complete or partial, the level if known, the cause and date if known, and whether any ridge detail or scar remains. A partial amputation may still be printable and comparable.
An 'unable to print' annotation should give the reason, the number of attempts, and any temporary condition that might change, such as a bandage or swelling. 'AMP' alone is inadequate because it does not distinguish a missing finger from a missing print, does not identify the digit, and does not tell the next examiner whether the record is complete. That ambiguity affects classification, search strategy, and whether a later reprint is needed.