The Global Issue Is Too Global: Narrowing an Individual Oral
A student prepares her Individual Oral on The Handmaid's Tale and A Doll's House. Her global issue is 'gender inequality'. Her two extracts are 38 lines from the Ceremony scene in Atwood and the final 40 lines of Ibsen's play, where Nora tells Torvald that she has been a doll. In a timed practice, she spends four minutes defining gender inequality around the world, three minutes summarising both plots, and two minutes reading quotations aloud. She has one minute left and no analysis of language. The teacher must decide whether to approve the global issue or ask for a revision, and how to coach her before the recorded oral. The student fears that a narrower issue will make her sound less 'important'.
1. Why is 'gender inequality' too broad for the Individual Oral, and what narrower global issue would you propose? Give two alternatives and explain the trade-offs.
Read the worked answer
Why it is too broad. 'Gender inequality' is a topic, not an issue that can be explored in ten minutes through two extracts. It invites definitions, global statistics, and plot summary, and it does not tell the student what to look for in the language of the extracts. The oral needs a global issue that is significant but narrow enough to be traced through specific textual moments.
Two narrower options. (1) 'Self-surveillance and complicity: how women internalise patriarchal expectations and then police themselves and others.' This fits Nora's performance of the doll-wife and Offred's moments of complicity in Gilead. (2) 'Domestic space as a site where political power is enforced and resisted.' This fits the Helmer living room and the Commander's house, including the Ceremony room.
Trade-offs. Option 1 is psychologically rich and easy to link across both texts, but it can become abstract; it needs concrete language about performance and gaze. Option 2 is more material and produces strong setting analysis, but it may drift into description. The best choice depends on the extracts: the Ceremony and Nora's final scene both centre on performance, so option 1 is the stronger fit. The issue remains global because it concerns a pattern across societies, not just two characters.
2. Evaluate the two extracts. Which one would you keep, which would you change, and why?
Read the worked answer
Keep the Atwood extract. The 38-line Ceremony passage is strong: it has Offred's first-person voice, the ritual's choreography, the Commander, and the wife's presence. It lets the student analyse power as a performance and shows complicity, not just victimhood.
Trim the Ibsen extract. The final 40 lines are at the maximum and include a lot of exposition. A tighter 25-30 line segment that includes 'I have been your doll-wife' and 'I must try to educate myself' would keep the key language while leaving room for analysis. The student does not need the whole resolution; she needs the moment where Nora names the performance.
Why not change both. Changing both extracts would waste preparation time. The problem in the practice oral was not the extracts; it was the four minutes of definition and three minutes of plot summary. The extracts can support the narrower issue if the student is coached to begin with a textual moment.
One caution. The Ibsen scene is dialogue-heavy, so the student must analyse stage directions and syntax, not just paraphrase Nora's speech. The Atwood passage is prose, so she must analyse deixis and address. The contrast in form is an asset if she names it.
3. Write a 60-second opening (about 120-150 words) that establishes the global issue, names both works, and avoids plot summary. Then explain the choices.
Read the worked answer
Opening (about 125 words). 'My global issue is self-surveillance: how women in patriarchal societies learn to police themselves, and how that complicity sustains the systems that constrain them. I will explore this through two moments of ritualised performance: the Ceremony in Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and Nora's final confrontation with Torvald in Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House. In both, the body is staged for an audience - Offred lying beneath the Commander, Nora dancing the tarantella - and in both the protagonist's language reveals the cost of having internalised the audience's gaze. I will argue that Atwood and Ibsen make self-surveillance visible through domestic ritual, and that their endings differ in how far each woman can imagine a self outside the performance.'
Why this works. It states the global issue in one sentence, names both works, and makes a comparative claim. It does not summarise the plots. It gives the listener a roadmap: ritual, gaze, ending. It also uses the word 'complicity', which keeps the issue analytical rather than sentimental. The student should then move immediately to a specific line in the first extract; the opening is a frame, not a preamble.